Abstract is missing.
- Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue GameHenry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor. 1-9 [doi]
- The Zeno Argumentation FrameworkThomas F. Gordon, Nikos I. Karacapilidis. 10-18 [doi]
- Achieving Fluency in Modernized and Formalized Hohfeld: Puzzles and Games for the LEGAL RELATIONS LanguageLayman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon. 19-28 [doi]
- The Use of Lexicons in Information Retrieval in Legal DatabasesJ. C. Smith. 29-38 [doi]
- Finding Legally Relevant Passages in Case OpinionsJody J. Daniels, Edwina L. Rissland. 39-46 [doi]
- Automatic Generation of Amendment LegislationTimothy Arnold-Moore. 56-62 [doi]
- Formalization of Legislative Documents Based on a Functional ModelDaniela Tiscornia, Fabrizio Turchi. 63-71 [doi]
- Automated Drafting of Self-Explaining DocumentsKarl Branting, James C. Lester, Charles B. Callaway. 72-81 [doi]
- The Other Formalization of Law: SGML Modelling and TaggingDaniel Poulin, Guy Huard, Alain Lavoie. 82-88 [doi]
- Knowledge Discovery in the Split Up ProjectJohn Zeleznikow, Andrew Stranieri. 89-97 [doi]
- The Exploration of Legal Text Corpora with Hierarchical Neural Networks: A Guided Tour in Public International LawDieter Merkl, Erich Schweighofer. 98-105 [doi]
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Time to Case DispositionDawn Wilkins, Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt. 106-113 [doi]
- Abstracting of Legal Cases: The SALOMON ExperienceMarie-Francine Moens, Caroline Uyttendaele, Jos Dumortier. 114-122 [doi]
- Finding Factors: Learning to Classify Case Opinions Under Abstract Fact CategoriesStefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley. 123-131 [doi]
- Ontologies in Legal Information Systems: The Need for Explicit Specifications of Domain ConceptualisationsTrevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Pepijn R. S. Visser. 132-141 [doi]
- Knowledge for Automated Legal Problem Solving: Theory Versus PracticeAnja Oskamp, Maaike Tragter. 142-150 [doi]
- A Method for the Development of Legal Knowledge SystemsPepijn R. S. Visser, Robert W. van Kralingen, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 151-160 [doi]
- Evaluating a Learning Environment for Case-Based Argumentation SkillsVincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley. 170-179 [doi]
- On Modeling Creativity in Legal ReasoningBipin Indurkhya. 180-189 [doi]
- Attacking Legal Argument by Examining Stability of Case Citation with Goal-Dependent AbstractionYoshiaki Okubo, Makoto Haraguchi. 190-197 [doi]
- Progress on Room 5: A Testbed for Public Interactive Semi-Formal Legal ArgumentationRonald Prescott Loui, Jeff Norman, Joe Altepeter, Dan Pinkard, Dan Craven, Jessica Linsday, Mark A. Foltz. 207-214 [doi]
- Some Arguments About Legal ArgumentsL. Thorne McCarty. 215-224 [doi]
- Distinguishing Different Roles in Normative ReasoningLeendert W. N. van der Torre, Yao-Hua Tan. 225-232 [doi]
- Towards a Logical Formalization of ResponsibilityLaurence Cholvy, Frédéric Cuppens, Claire Saurel. 233-242 [doi]
- Logical Tools for Legal Argument: A Practical Assessment in the Domain of TortBart Verheij, Jaap Hage, Arno R. Lodder. 243-249 [doi]
- Family_Negotiator: An Intelligent Tool for Supporting Legal Negotiation in Australian Family Law (Abstract)Emilia Bellucci, John Zeleznikow. 251 [doi]
- Tools for Automated Legislative Drafting (Abstract)Nienke den Haan. 252 [doi]
- MicroMax at Seven (Abstract)Marc Lauritsen. 253-254 [doi]
- Question/Answer Dialogues for Interfacing a Database with Supreme Court Decisions (Abstract)José Gabriel Lopes, Paulo Quaresma, Irene Pimenta Rodrigues. 255 [doi]
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Law Enforcement (Abstract)José Neves, José Machado, António Abelha. 256 [doi]
- The Logic of Enactment (abstract)Lambèr M. M. Royakkers, Frank Dignum. 257 [doi]
- Bringing IT Support for Legislative Drafting one Step Further: From Drafting Dupport to Design Assistance (Abstract)Wim Voermans, Robert W. van Kralingen. 259 [doi]
- Improving Human-Computer Interaction for Legal KBS (Abstract)Radboud Winkels, David Bosschaert. 260 [doi]