Table of Contents

• Initial delay vs. interruptions: Between the devil and the deep blue seaTobias Hoßfeld, Sebastian Egger, Raimund Schatz, Markus Fiedler, Kathrin Masuch, Charlott Lorentzen. 1-6 [doi]
• Welcome message from the QoMEX 2013 chairsChristian Timmerer, Patrick Le Callet, Martín Varela, Stefan Winkler, Tiago H. Falk, Raimund Schatz. 1 [doi]
• Specific chromatic errors: A quality assessmentMarco V. Bernardo, António M. G. Pinheiro, Manuela Pereira, Paulo Torrão Fiadeiro. 1-5 [doi]
• A reduced-reference parametric model for audiovisual quality of IPTV servicesToni Mäki, Dragan Kukolj, Dragana Dordevic, Martín Varela. 6-11 [doi]
• No-reference bitstream-based impairment detection for high efficiency video codingGlenn Van Wallendael, Nicolas Staelens, Lucjan Janowski, Jan De Cock, Piet Demeester, Rik Van de Walle. 7-12 [doi]
• Image complexity and spatial informationHonghai Yu, Stefan Winkler. 12-17 [doi]
• Challenges in crowd-based video quality assessmentChristian Keimel, Julian Habigt, Klaus Diepold. 13-18 [doi]
• Detailed comparative analysis of PESQ and VISQOL behaviour in the context of playout delay adjustments introduced by VOIP jitter buffer algorithmsAndrew Hines, Peter Pocta, Hugh Melvin. 18-23 [doi]
• Integrating the everyday-life context in subjective video quality experimentsWendy Van den Broeck, An Jacobs, Nicolas Staelens. 19-24 [doi]
• A web based subjective evaluation platformBenjamin Rainer, Markus Waltl, Christian Timmerer. 24-25 [doi]
• Optimizing image quality in MRI: On the evaluation of k-space trajectories for under-sampled MR acquisitionHiêp Quang Luong, Bart Goossens, Jan Aelterman, Ljiljana Platisa, Wilfried Philips. 25-26 [doi]
• The development of a free stereopsis test for active shutter displaysKlaas Bombeke, Jan Van Looy. 26-27 [doi]
• Defining aesthetic principles for automatic media gallery layout for visual and audial event summarization based on social networksThomas Steiner, Ruben Verborgh, Joaquim Gabarró, Rik Van de Walle. 27-28 [doi]
• Performance VS quality of experience in a remote control application based on real-time 3D video feedbackEnrico Masala, Antonio Servetti. 28-29 [doi]
• A proposal project for a blind image quality assessment by learning distortions from the full reference image quality assessmentsStefane Paris. 29-30 [doi]
• Subjective and objective evaluation of an audiovisual subjective dataset for research and developmentMargaret H. Pinson, Christian Schmidmer, Lucjan Janowski, Romuald Pépion, Quan Huynh-Thu, Phillip Corriveau, Audrey Younkin, Patrick Le Callet, Marcus Barkowsky, William Ingram. 30-31 [doi]
• A system for subjective evaluation of audio, video and audiovisual quality using MUSHRA and SAMVIQ methodsHerbert Thoma. 31-32 [doi]
• Reduced-reference quality estimation for rate control in 3D video multicastingAlessandro Floris, Luigi Atzori, Giaime Ginesu, Daniele D. Giusto. 32-33 [doi]
• VITEQ: A generic framework for no-reference quality evaluation of video testimonialsSteven Verstockt, Pieterjan De Potter, Wesley De Neve, Peter Lambert, Rik Van de Walle. 33-34 [doi]
• The SJTU 4K video sequence datasetLi Song, Xun Tang, Wei Zhang, Xiaokang Yang, Pingjian Xia. 34-35 [doi]
• Microworkers vs. facebook: The impact of crowdsourcing platform choice on experimental resultsBruno Gardlo, Michal Ries, Tobias Hoßfeld, Raimund Schatz. 35-36 [doi]
• Use- and QoE-related aspects of personal cloud applications: An exploratory surveyKarel Vandenbroucke, Katrien De Moor, Lieven De Marez. 36-37 [doi]
• Peak signal-to-noise ratio revisited: Is simple beautiful?Jari Korhonen, Junyong You. 37-38 [doi]
• The importance of task completion times for modeling web-QoE of consecutive web page requestsDominik Strohmeier, Maija Mikkola, Alexander Raake. 38-39 [doi]
• Impact of mobile devices and usage location on perceived multimedia qualityAndrew Catellier, Margaret H. Pinson, William Ingram, Arthur A. Webster. 39-44 [doi]
• QoE Alchemy 2.0: An improved test setup for the pecuniary bias of QoEAndreas Sackl, Patrick Zwickl, Peter Reichl. 40-41 [doi]
• Performance evaluation of image quality metrics with respect to their use for super-resolution enhancementTomas Lukes, Karel Fliegel, Milos Klima. 42-43 [doi]
• Adaptive Media Playout for Inter-Destination Media SynchronizationBenjamin Rainer, Christian Timmerer. 44-45 [doi]
• Evaluating the performance of multimedia presentations in communicating radiological findingsSebastian Möller, Franziska Franz, Karlheinz Glaser-Seidnitzer. 45-50 [doi]
• Cross-lab study on preference of experience in 3DTV: Influence from display technology and test environmentJing Li, Ondrej Kaller, Francesca De Simone, Jussi Hakala, Dawid Juszka, Patrick Le Callet. 46-47 [doi]
• Quality assessment of images displayed on LCD screen with local backlight dimmingClaire Mantel, Nino Burini, Jari Korhonen, Ehsan Nadernejad, Søren Forchhammer. 48-49 [doi]
• Reducing the duration of paired-comparison experiments for visual quality assessmentClaire Mantel, Søren Forchhammer, Jari Korhonen. 50-51 [doi]
• Examining subjective evaluation methods used in multimedia Quality of Experience researchKristina Kunze, Dominik Strohmeier. 51-56 [doi]
• "To pool or not to pool": A comparison of temporal pooling methods for HTTP adaptive video streamingMichael Seufert, Martin Slanina, Sebastian Egger, Meik Kottkamp. 52-57 [doi]
• How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliablyJari Korhonen, Nino Burini, Junyong You, Ehsan Nadernejad. 57-62 [doi]
• Automated QoE evaluation of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTPClaudio Alberti, Daniele Renzi, Christian Timmerer, Christopher Müller, Stefan Lederer, Stefano Battista, Marco Mattavelli. 58-63 [doi]
• Too tired for calling? A physiological measure of fatigue caused by bandwidth limitationsJan-Niklas Antons, Robert Schleicher, Sebastian Arndt, Sebastian Möller, Gabriel Curio. 63-67 [doi]
• Where's the music? comparing the QoE impact of temporal impairments between music and video streamingAndreas Sackl, Sebastian Egger, Raimund Schatz. 64-69 [doi]
• Packet loss protection for interactive audio object rendering: A multiple description approachXiguang Zheng, Christian Ritz. 68-73 [doi]
• Towards an understanding of visual appeal in website designMartín Varela, Toni Mäki, Lea Skorin-Kapov, Tobias Hoßfeld. 70-75 [doi]
• A perceptual quality based rate distortion modelChao Wang, Xuanqin Mou, Lei Zhang 0006. 74-79 [doi]
• Comprehensive modeling of the formation process of sound-qualityAlexander Raake, Jens Blauert. 76-81 [doi]
• Comparison of 3D portable display restitution techniques based on stereo and motion parallaxMartin Rerabek, Touradj Ebrahimi. 80-85 [doi]
• On the perception of apparent source width and listener envelopment in wave field synthesisJohannes Nowak, Judith Liebetrau, Thomas Sporer. 82-87 [doi]
• Waiting times in quality of experience for web based servicesSebastian Egger, Tobias Hoßfeld, Raimund Schatz, Markus Fiedler. 86-96 [doi]
• Effects of shaping of binaural room impulse responses on localizationStephan Werner, Judith Liebetrau. 88-93 [doi]
• Horizontal localization of auditory and visual events with directional audio coding and 2D videoOlli Rummukainen, Javier Gomez Bolanos, Ville Pulkki. 94-99 [doi]
• The TUM high definition video datasetsChristian Keimel, Arne Redl, Klaus Diepold. 97-102 [doi]
• A quality assessment protocol for free-viewpoint video sequences synthesized from decompressed depth dataEmilie Bosc, Philippe Hanhart, Patrick Le Callet, Touradj Ebrahimi. 100-105 [doi]
• Using overlapping subjective datasets to assess the performance of objective quality metrics on Scalable Video Coding and error concealmentYohann Pitrey, Romuald Pépion, Patrick Le Callet, Marcus Barkowsky. 103-108 [doi]
• 3D video quality assessment with multi-scale subjective methodValentin Kulyk, Samira Tavakoli, Mats Folkesson, Kjell Brunnström, Kun Wang, Narciso Garcia. 106-111 [doi]
• NAMA3DS1-COSPAD1: Subjective video quality assessment database on coding conditions introducing freely available high quality 3D stereoscopic sequencesMatthieu Urvoy, Marcus Barkowsky, Romain Cousseau, Yao Koudota, Vincent Ricordel, Patrick Le Callet, Jesús Gutiérrez, Narciso N. García. 109-114 [doi]
• How much longer to go? The influence of waiting time and progress indicators on quality of experience for mobile visual search applied to print mediaYi Cao, Christian Ritz, Raad Raad. 112-117 [doi]
• Sensory effect dataset and test setupsMarkus Waltl, Christian Timmerer, Benjamin Rainer, Hermann Hellwagner. 115-120 [doi]
• Searching for the preferred backlight intensity in liquid crystal displays with local backlight dimmingJari Korhonen, Claire Mantel, Nino Burini, Søren Forchhammer. 118-123 [doi]
• Feature set augmentation for enhancing the performance of a non-intrusive quality predictorPetko N. Petkov, Hannes Helgason, W. Bastiaan Kleijn. 121-126 [doi]
• Development of a binocular eye tracking system for quality assessment of S3D representationsSara Kepplinger, Frank Hofmeyer, Martin Gründl. 124-125 [doi]
• A 4D multimedia player enabling sensory experienceMarkus Waltl, Benjamin Rainer, Stefan Lederer, Christian Timmerer, Katharina Gassner, Ralf Terlutter. 126-127 [doi]
• Audiovisual reproduction in surrounding display: Effect of spatial width of audio and videoOlli Rummukainen, Ville Pulkki. 127-132 [doi]
• Tally: A web-based subjective testing toolAnkit K. Jain, Can Bal, Truong Q. Nguyen. 128-129 [doi]
• High definition H.264/AVC subjective video database for evaluating the influence of slice losses on quality perceptionNicolas Staelens, Glenn Van Wallendael, Rik Van de Walle, Filip De Turck, Piet Demeester. 130-135 [doi]
• Audio-visual discrepancy and the influence on vertical sound source localizationStephan Werner, Judith Liebetrau, Thomas Sporer. 133-139 [doi]
• Stereoscopic quality datasets under various test conditionsLiyuan Xing, Junyong You, Touradj Ebrahimi, Andrew Perkis. 136-141 [doi]
• Predicting video call quality in future mobile networksBlazej Lewcio, Sebastian Möller. 140-145 [doi]
• California-ND: An annotated dataset for near-duplicate detection in personal photo collectionsAmornched Jinda-Apiraksa, Vassilios Vonikakis, Stefan Winkler. 142-147 [doi]
• Preliminary findings on image preference characterization based on neurophysiological signal analysis: Towards objective QoE modelingTiago H. Falk, Yael Pomerantz, Khalil ur Rehman Laghari, Sebastian Möller, Tom Chau. 146-147 [doi]
• Wireless vs. wireline shootout: Howuser expectations influence quality of experienceAndreas Sackl, Kathrin Masuch, Sebastian Egger, Raimund Schatz. 148-149 [doi]
• Changes of vigilance caused by varying bit rate conditionsJan-Niklas Antons, Friedemann Koster, Sebastian Arndt, Sebastian Möller, Robert Schleicher. 148-151 [doi]
• Evaluation of visual privacy filters impact on video surveillance intelligibilityPavel Korshunov, Claudia Araimo, Francesca De Simone, Carmelo Velardo, Jean-Luc Dugelay, Touradj Ebrahimi. 150-151 [doi]
• Subjective quality ratings and physiological correlates of synthesized speechSebastian Arndt, Jan-Niklas Antons, Rishabh Gupta, Khalil ur Rehman Laghari, Robert Schleicher, Sebastian Möller, Tiago H. Falk. 152-157 [doi]
• Investigating the effects of test clip quality distribution in HD video Quality-of-Experience studiesPeter Fröhlich, Michal Ries, Kathrin Masuch, Raimund Schatz. 152-153 [doi]
• Asymmetric coding scheme for 3D frame-compatible formatsJin Li, Jan De Cock, Peter Lambert, Rik Van de Walle. 154-155 [doi]
• Mapping of Received Signal Strength Indicator to QoE in VoIP applications over wlanIs-Haka Mkwawa, Emmanuel Jammeh, Lingfen Sun. 156-157 [doi]
• How does audio-haptic enhancement influence emotional response to mobile media?Amaya Becvar Weddle, Hua Yu. 158-163 [doi]
• Ensuring Quality of Experience for markerless image recognition applied to print media contentStephen J. Davis, Eva Cheng, Christian Ritz, Ian S. Burnett. 158-163 [doi]
• Studying the challenges in assessing the perceived quality of mobile-phone based videoSelim Ickin, Lucjan Janowski, Katarzyna Wac, Markus Fiedler. 164-169 [doi]
• On the visibility of flicker distortions in naturalistic videosLark Kwon Choi, Lawrence K. Cormack, Alan C. Bovik. 164-169 [doi]
• Viewing experience of 3D movie with subtitles Where to put subtitles in a 3D movie?Shuai Wan, Bo Chang, Fuzheng Yang. 170-175 [doi]
• The QoE alchemy: Turning quality into money. Experiences with a refined methodology for the evaluation of willingness-to-pay for service qualityAndreas Sackl, Sebastian Egger, Patrick Zwickl, Peter Reichl. 170-175 [doi]
• A no-reference machine learning based video quality predictorMuhammad Shahid, Andreas Rossholm, Benny Lövström. 176-181 [doi]
• No reference image quality assessment based on statistical distribution of local Sub-Image-SimilarityBeilian Li, Xuanqin Mou. 176-181 [doi]
• A new mobile audio quality assessment using Jitter Distortion Measure approachYuhong Yang, Hongjiang Yu, Ruimin Hu, Song Wang, Songbo Xie. 182-187 [doi]
• Task-based subject validation: Reliability metricsLucjan Janowski. 182-187 [doi]
• Saliency based video quality prediction using multi-way data analysisArne Redl, Christian Keimel, Klaus Diepold. 188-193 [doi]
• Towards an efficient methodology for evaluation of quality of experience in Augmented RealityJordi Puig, Andrew Perkis, Frank Lindseth, Touradj Ebrahimi. 188-193 [doi]
• Parametric audio quality model for IPTV services - ITU-T P.1201.2 audioMarie-Neige Garcia, Alexander Raake, Bernhard Feiten. 194-199 [doi]
• Is taking into account the subjects degree of knowledge and expertise enough when rating quality?Miguel Rios Quintero, Alexander Raake. 194-199 [doi]
• Long duration audiovisual content: Impact of content type and impairment appearance on user quality expectations over timeAdam Borowiak, Ulrich Reiter. 200-205 [doi]
• Improved foveation- and saliency-based visual attention prediction under a quality assessment taskMilind S. Gide, Lina J. Karam. 200-205 [doi]
• A visibility model for quality assessment of dimmed imagesTai-Hsiang Huang, Chen-Tai Kao, Yi-Chia Chen, Su-Ling Yeh, Homer H. Chen. 206-211 [doi]
• A saliency weighted no-reference perceptual blur metric for the automotive environmentAnthony Winterlich, Vladimir Zlokolica, Patrick Denny, Liam Kilmartin, Martin Glavin, Edward Jones. 206-211 [doi]
• Overview of Eye tracking DatasetsStefan Winkler, Ramanathan Subramanian. 212-217 [doi]
• RMIT3DV: Pre-announcement of a creative commons uncompressed HD 3D video databaseEva Cheng, P. Burton, Jonathan Burton, Alex Joseski, Ian S. Burnett. 212-217 [doi]
• Perceptual experience of time-varying video qualityAbdul Rehman, Zhou Wang. 218-223 [doi]
• Performance comparison of subjective assessment methods for 3D video qualityTaichi Kawano, Kazuhisa Yamagishi, Takanori Hayashi. 218-223 [doi]
• A utility model for sensory experienceChristian Timmerer, Benjamin Rainer, Markus Waltl. 224-229 [doi]
• Comparing objective visual quality impairment detection in 2D and 3D video sequencesNicolas Staelens, Arnaud Boussaer, Nick Vercammen, Geert Van hoogenbemt, Brecht Vermeulen, Piet Demeester. 224-229 [doi]
• A smartphone agent for qoe evaluation and user classification over mobile networksAlessandro Verdolini, Stefano Petrangeli. 230-235 [doi]
• Validation of a novel approach to subjective quality evaluation of conventional and 3D broadcasted video servicesJesús Gutiérrez, Pablo Perez, Fernando Jaureguizar, Julián Cabrera, Narciso N. García. 230-235 [doi]
• Gaming taxonomy: An overview of concepts and evaluation methods for computer gaming QoESebastian Möler, Steven Schmidt, Justus Beyer. 236-241 [doi]
• Quality assessment of asymmetric stereo pair formed from decoded and synthesized viewsPhilippe Hanhart, Francesca De Simone, Touradj Ebrahimi. 236-241 [doi]
• QoE in 10 seconds: Are short video clip lengths sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment?Peter Fröhlich, Sebastian Egger, Raimund Schatz, Michael Mühlegger, Kathrin Masuch, Bruno Gardlo. 242-247 [doi]
• A study on perception of mobile video with surrounding contextual influencesJingteng Xue, Chang Wen Chen. 248-253 [doi]
• A new perceptual-based no-reference contrast metric for natural images based on human attention and image dynamicMohan Liu, Patrick Ndjiki-Nya. 254-259 [doi]
• Optimizing image quality using test signals: Trading off blur, noise and contrastBart Goossens, Hiêp Quang Luong, Ljiljana Platisa, Wilfried Philips. 260-265 [doi]
• Content categorization based on implicit and explicit user feedback: Combining self-reports with EEG emotional state analysisUlrich Reiter, Katrien De Moor. 266-271 [doi]
• Electroencephalogram alterations during perception of pleasant and unpleasant odorsAshkan Yazdani, Eleni Kroupi, Jean-Marc Vesin, Touradj Ebrahimi. 272-277 [doi]
• Investigating the impact of sensory effects on the Quality of Experience and emotional response in web videosBenjamin Rainer, Markus Waltl, Eva Cheng, Muawiyath Shujau, Christian Timmerer, Stephen J. Davis, Ian S. Burnett, Christian Ritz, Hermann Hellwagner. 278-283 [doi]
• Perception of low-quality videos analyzed by means of electroencephalographySebastian Arndt, Jan-Niklas Antons, Robert Schleicher, Sebastian Möller, Gabriel Curio. 284-289 [doi]