Abstract is missing.
- Factors, issues and values: revisiting reasoning with casesLatifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 3-12 [doi]
- An integrated theory of causal stories and evidential argumentsFloris Bex. 13-22 [doi]
- A study of query reformulation for patent prior art search with partial patent applicationsMohamed Reda Bouadjenek, Scott Sanner, Gabriela Ferraro. 23-32 [doi]
- Causal analysis for attributing responsibility in legal casesHana Chockler, Norman E. Fenton, Jeroen Keppens, David A. Lagnado. 33-42 [doi]
- Reliability of electronic evidence: an application for model-based auditingRob Christiaanse, Paul Griffioen, Joris Hulstijn. 43-52 [doi]
- Machine learning for readability of legislative sentencesMichael Curtotti, Eric McCreath, Tom Bruce, Sara Frug, Wayne Weibel, Nicolas Ceynowa. 53-62 [doi]
- Thou shalt is not you willGuido Governatori. 63-68 [doi]
- Introducing LUIMA: an experiment in legal conceptual retrieval of vaccine injury decisions using a UIMA type system and toolsMatthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley, Ran Chen, Preethi Sureshkumar, Chen Wang, Eric Nyberg, Vern R. Walker. 69-78 [doi]
- Tax non-compliance detection using co-evolution of tax evasion risk and audit likelihoodErik Hemberg, Jacob B. Rosen, Geoff Warner, Sanith Wijesinghe, Una-May O'Reilly. 79-88 [doi]
- How to ground a language for legal discourse in a prototypical perceptual semanticsL. Thorne McCarty. 89-98 [doi]
- Deontic defeasible reasoning in legal interpretation: two options for modelling interpretive argumentsAntonino Rotolo, Guido Governatori, Giovanni Sartor. 99-108 [doi]
- A structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentationSjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij. 109-118 [doi]
- Evaluating expertise and sample bias effects for privilege classification in e-discoveryJyothi K. Vinjumur. 119-127 [doi]
- Constructing and understanding Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenario schemesCharlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij. 128-137 [doi]
- Modelling dialogues in court using a gradual argumentation model: a case studyBin Wei, Jinhua Huang. 138-147 [doi]
- The case law of the Italian constitutional court, its power laws, and the web of scholarly opinionsTommaso Agnoloni, Ugo Pagallo. 151-155 [doi]
- Evaluating the use of abstract dialectical frameworks to represent case lawLatifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 156-160 [doi]
- adequate causal linkMichal Araszkiewicz. 161-165 [doi]
- Representation of an actual divorce dispute in the parenting plan support systemMichal Araszkiewicz, Agata Lopatkiewicz, Adam Zienkiewicz, Tomasz Zurek. 166-170 [doi]
- Linking legal open data: breaking the accessibility and language barrier in european legislation and case lawGuido Boella, Luigi Di Caro, Michele Graziadei, Loredana Cupi, Carlo Emilio Salaroglio, Llio Humphreys, Hristo Konstantinov, Kornel Marko, Livio Robaldo, Claudio Ruffini, Kiril Simov, Andrea Violato, Veli Stroetmann. 171-175 [doi]
- Visualizing Brazilian justice: the supreme court 2.0 projectDaniel M. Chada, Felipe A. Silva, Patrícia Borges. 176-180 [doi]
- The role of evaluation in AI and law: an examination of its different forms in the AI and law journalJack G. Conrad, John Zeleznikow. 181-186 [doi]
- RuleOMS: a rule-based online management systemMohammad Badiul Islam, Guido Governatori. 187-191 [doi]
- Elliptical lists in legislative textsRéka Markovich, Syi, Gábor Hamp. 192-195 [doi]
- Using 'big' metadata for criminal intelligence: understanding limitations and appropriate safeguardsAlana Maurushat, Lyria Bennett Moses, David Vaile. 196-200 [doi]
- Originalism, hypothesis testing and big dataJohn O. McGinnis, Branden Stein. 201-205 [doi]
- Toward machine-assisted participation in eRulemaking: an argumentation model of evaluabilityJoonsuk Park, Cheryl Blake, Claire Cardie. 206-210 [doi]
- Transfer of predictive models for classification of statutory texts in multi-jurisdictional settingsJaromír Savelka, Kevin D. Ashley. 216-220 [doi]
- At your service, on the definition of services from sources of lawTom M. van Engers, Robert van Doesburg. 221-225 [doi]
- Writing and reviewing contracts: don't you wish to save time, effort, and money?Jason Gabbard, Jana Z. Sukkarieh, Federico Silva. 229-230 [doi]
- AI analysis of trademark law: trademarknow NameCheck and NameWatchAnna Ronkainen. 231-232 [doi]
- Demonstration of a structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentationSjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij. 233-234 [doi]