Abstract is missing.
- Structural text segmentation of legal documentsDennis Aumiller, Satya Almasian, Sebastian Lackner, Michael Gertz 0001. 2-11 [doi]
- Precedential constraint: the role of issuesTrevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson. 12-21 [doi]
- Incorporating domain knowledge for extractive summarization of legal case documentsPaheli Bhattacharya, Soham Poddar, Koustav Rudra, Kripabandhu Ghosh 0001, Saptarshi Ghosh. 22-31 [doi]
- AI systems and product liabilityGeorg Borges. 32-39 [doi]
- A combined rule-based and machine learning approach for automated GDPR compliance checkingRajaa El Hamdani, Majd Mustapha, David Restrepo Amariles, Aurore Clément Troussel, Sébastien Meeùs, Katsiaryna Krasnashchok. 40-49 [doi]
- On semantics-based minimal revision for legal reasoningWachara Fungwacharakorn, Kanae Tsushima, Ken Satoh. 50-59 [doi]
- Explainable artificial intelligence, lawyer's perspectiveLukasz Górski, Shashishekar Ramakrishna. 60-68 [doi]
- Unravel legal references in defeasible deontic logicGuido Governatori, Francesco Olivieri. 69-78 [doi]
- Context-aware legal citation recommendation using deep learningZihan Huang, Charles Low, Mengqiu Teng, Hongyi Zhang, Daniel E. Ho, Mark S. Krass, Matthias Grabmair. 79-88 [doi]
- A dynamic model for balancing valuesJuliano Maranhão, Edelcio G. de Souza, Giovanni Sartor. 89-98 [doi]
- Case-level prediction of motion outcomes in civil litigationDevin J. McConnell, James Zhu, Sachin Pandya, Derek Aguiar. 99-108 [doi]
- Evaluating document representations for content-based legal literature recommendationsMalte Ostendorff, Elliott Ash, Terry Ruas, Bela Gipp, Julián Moreno Schneider, Georg Rehm. 109-118 [doi]
- From data to information: automating data science to explore the U.S. court systemAndrew Paley, Andong L. Li Zhao, Harper Pack, Sergio Servantez, Rachel F. Adler, Marko Sterbentz, Adam Pah, David Schwartz, Cameron Barrie, Alexander Einarsson, Kristian Hammond. 119-128 [doi]
- Lex Rosetta: transfer of predictive models across languages, jurisdictions, and legal domainsJaromír Savelka, Hannes Westermann, Karim Benyekhlef, Charlotte S. Alexander, Jayla C. Grant, David Restrepo Amariles, Rajaa El Hamdani, Sébastien Meeùs, Aurore Clément Troussel, Michal Araszkiewicz, Kevin D. Ashley, Alexandra Ashley, Karl Branting, Mattia Falduti, Matthias Grabmair, Jakub Harasta, Tereza Novotná, Elizabeth Tippett, Shiwanni Johnson. 129-138 [doi]
- Converting copyright legislation into machine-executable code: interpretation, coding validation and legal alignmentAlice Witt, Anna Huggins, Guido Governatori, Joshua Buckley. 139-148 [doi]
- Hardness of case-based decisions: a formal theoryHeng Zheng, Davide Grossi, Bart Verheij. 149-158 [doi]
- When does pretraining help?: assessing self-supervised learning for law and the CaseHOLD dataset of 53, 000+ legal holdingsLucia Zheng, Neel Guha, Brandon R. Anderson, Peter Henderson 0002, Daniel E. Ho. 159-168 [doi]
- Practical tools from formal models: the ECHR as a case studyKatie Atkinson, Joe Collenette, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou. 170-174 [doi]
- On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision makingFloris Bex, Henry Prakken. 175-179 [doi]
- The burden of persuasion in structured argumentationRoberta Calegari, Régis Riveret, Giovanni Sartor. 180-184 [doi]
- Prediction of monetary penalties for data protection cases in multiple languagesAaron Ceross, Tingting Zhu. 185-189 [doi]
- Regulating artificial intelligence: a technology regulator's perspectiveJoshua Ellul, Gordon J. Pace, Stephen McCarthy, Trevor Sammut, Juanita Brockdorff, Matthew Scerri. 190-194 [doi]
- Making intelligent online dispute resolution tools available to self-represented litigants in the public justice system: towards and ethical use of the ai technology in the administration of justiceFernando Esteban de la Rosa, John Zeleznikow. 195-199 [doi]
- plumitifs-descriptions data-to-text dataset for natural language generationNicolas Garneau, Eve Gaumond, Luc Lamontagne, Pierre-Luc Déziel. 200-204 [doi]
- Anonymization of german legal court rulingsIngo Glaser, Tom Schamberger, Florian Matthes. 205-209 [doi]
- Enhancing a recidivism prediction tool with machine learning: effectiveness and algorithmic fairnessMarzieh Karimi-Haghighi, Carlos Castillo. 210-214 [doi]
- Towards compliance checking in reified I/O logic via SHACLLivio Robaldo. 215-219 [doi]
- Modelling legal proceduresAntonino Rotolo, Clara Smith. 220-224 [doi]
- Automatic extraction of amendments from polish statutory lawAleksander Smywinski-Pohl, Mateusz Piech, Zbigniew Kaleta, Krzysztof Wróbel. 225-229 [doi]
- A dataset for evaluating legal question answering on private international lawFrancesco Sovrano, Monica Palmirani, Biagio Distefano, Salvatore Sapienza, Fabio Vitali. 230-234 [doi]
- Discovering the rationale of decisions: towards a method for aligning learning and reasoningCor Steging, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij. 235-239 [doi]
- Process mining-enabled jurimetrics: analysis of a Brazilian court's judicial performance in the business law processingAdriana Jacoto Unger, José Francisco dos Santos Neto, Marcelo Fantinato, Sarajane Marques Peres, Julio Trecenti, Renata Hirota. 240-244 [doi]
- Using transformers to improve answer retrieval for legal questionsAndrew Vold, Jack G. Conrad. 245-249 [doi]
- Toward summarizing case decisions via extracting argument issues, reasons, and conclusionsHuihui Xu, Jaromír Savelka, Kevin D. Ashley. 250-254 [doi]
- CriminelBART: a French Canadian legal language model specialized in criminal lawNicolas Garneau, Eve Gaumond, Luc Lamontagne, Pierre-Luc Déziel. 256-257 [doi]
- Applying decision tree analysis to family court decisions: factors determining child custody in TaiwanSieh-Chuen Huang, Hsuan-Lei Shao, Robert B. Leflar. 258-259 [doi]
- Sentence classification for contract law cases: a natural language processing approachJonathan R. Mok, Wai Yin Mok, Rachel V. Mok. 260-261 [doi]
- Constraint answer set programming as a tool to improve legislative drafting: a rules as code experimentJason Morris. 262-263 [doi]
- Predicting legal proceedings status: approaches based on sequential text dataFelipe Maia Polo, Itamar Ciochetti, Emerson Bertolo. 264-265 [doi]
- Pathways to legal dynamics in roboticsAntonino Rotolo, Luciano H. Tamargo, Diego C. Martínez. 266-267 [doi]
- Labels distribution matters in performance achieved in legal judgment prediction tasksOlivier Salaün, Philippe Langlais, Karim Benyekhlef. 268-269 [doi]
- A simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interestsFrederike Zufall, Rampei Kimura, Linyu Peng. 270-271 [doi]
- Interactive system for arranging issues based on PROLEG in civil litigationKen Satoh, Kazuko Takahashi, Tatsuki Kawasaki. 273-274 [doi]
- Live demonstration of a working collaborative enegotiation system (smartsettle infinity)Ernest Thiessen, Graham Ross. 275-276 [doi]
- BERT-based ensemble methods with data augmentation for legal textual entailment in COLIEE statute law taskMasaharu Yoshioka, Yasuhiro Aoki, Youta Suzuki. 278-284 [doi]
- Legal norm retrieval with variations of the bert model combined with TF-IDF vectorizationSabine Wehnert, Viju Sudhi, Shipra Dureja, Libin Kutty, Saijal Shahania, Ernesto William De Luca. 285-294 [doi]
- To tune or not to tune?: zero-shot models for legal case entailmentGuilherme Moraes Rosa, Ruan Chaves Rodrigues, Roberto de Alencar Lotufo, Rodrigo Nogueira. 295-300 [doi]