Table of Contents

• Case Frames and Case-Based Arguments in Statutory InterpretationMichal Araszkiewicz. 2-13 [doi]
• Fighting the Knowledge Representation Bottleneck with Large Language ModelsMarco Billi, Giuseppe Pisano, Marco Sanchi. 14-24 [doi]
• Decision Support in Law: From Formalizing Rules to Reasoning with JustificationJeremy Bouche-Pillon, Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles, Yannick Chevalier, Pascale Zaraté. 25-36 [doi]
• When Precedents ClashCecilia Di Florio, Huimin Dong, Antonino Rotolo. 37-47 [doi]
• Modeling Judicial Discretion with Nuanced PermissionsJosephine Dik, Réka Markovich. 48-59 [doi]
• Using LLMs to Discover Legal FactorsMorgan A. Gray, Jaromír Savelka, Wesley M. Oliver, Kevin D. Ashley. 60-71 [doi]
• Detecting Vague Clauses in Privacy Policies: The Analysis of Data Categories Using BERT Models and LLMsGiulia Grundler, Ruta Liepina, Mariaceleste Musicco, Francesca Lagioia, Andrea Galassi, Giovanni Sartor, Paolo Torroni. 72-83 [doi]
• A Narrative Assistant for Traffic Accidents Based on Large Language Models (LLM)Jo-Chi Kung, Chia-Hui Chang, Huai-Hsuan Huang, Kuo-Chun Chien. 84-94 [doi]
• Draft Better ContractsCosimo Laneve, Alessandro Parenti, Giovanni Sartor. 95-106 [doi]
• Unravelling the ECHR: Components of Legal Case AnalysisJack Mumford, Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 107-118 [doi]
• Norm Compliance in Reinforcement Learning Agents via Restraining BoltsEmery A. Neufeld, Agata Ciabattoni, Radu Florin Tulcan. 119-130 [doi]
• An Application of Case-Based Reasoning to Decision-Making in Dutch Administrative LawJoep Nouwens, Annemarie Borg, Henry Prakken. 131-141 [doi]
• Citation Anchor Text for Improving Precedent Retrieval: An Experimental Study on Indian Legal DocumentsGaurang Patil, Bhoomeendra Singh Sisodiya, P. Krishna Reddy, K. V. K. Santhy. 142-154 [doi]
• Getting in the Door: Streamlining Intake in Civil Legal Services with Large Language ModelsQuinten Steenhuis, Hannes Westermann. 155-167 [doi]
• Robots in the Middle: Evaluating LLMs in Dispute ResolutionJinzhe Tan, Hannes Westermann, Nikhil Reddy Pottanigari, Jaromír Savelka, Sébastien Meeùs, Mia Godet, Karim Benyekhlef. 168-179 [doi]
• A Case-Based-Reasoning Analysis of the COMPAS DatasetWijnand van Woerkom, Davide Grossi, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij. 180-190 [doi]
• Hybrid Legal Norm Retrieval: Leveraging Knowledge Graphs and Textual RepresentationsSabine Wehnert, Visakh Padmanabhan, Ernesto William De Luca. 191-203 [doi]
• Automating Fundamental Right Impact Assessment: An Open ExperimentXinyue Zhang, Vanja Skoric, Giovanni Sileno. 204-214 [doi]
• Leveraging LLM for Identification and Extraction of Normative StatementsMay Myo Zin, Ken Satoh, Georg Borges. 215-225 [doi]
• Automated Semantic Annotation Pipeline for Brazilian Judicial DecisionsMelissa Zorzanelli Costa, Dylan Faria Robson, Thiago Baiense Peçanha Vieira, Jean-Rémi Bourguet, Giancarlo Guizzardi, João Paulo A. Almeida. 226-238 [doi]
• Values and Factor Ascription ArgumentsTomasz Zurek, Adam Z. Wyner, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 239-248 [doi]
• Conflict Analysis for Timed Contract AutomataShaun Azzopardi, Gordon J. Pace. 250-255 [doi]
• Dispute Resolution in Legal Mediation with Quantitative ArgumentationXiao Chi. 256-261 [doi]
• Prosecutorial Outcome Predication with LoRA and QLoRAKuo-Chun Chien, Chia-Hui Chang, Huai-Hsuan Huang, Jo-Chi Kung. 262-268 [doi]
• How to Manage My Data? With Machine-Interpretable GDPR Rights!Beatriz Esteves, Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Georg Philip Krog, Paul Ryan. 269-274 [doi]
• Legal Chunking: Evaluating Methods for Effective Legal Text RetrievalAndrea Filippo Ferraris, Davide Audrito, Giovanni Siragusa, Alessandro Piovano. 275-281 [doi]
• Combining Network and Text to Provide Legal PincitesNicolas Garneau, Henrik Palmer Olsen, Antoine Corduant, Fabien Tarissan. 282-287 [doi]
• Annotating Legal Argument Schemes: A Parametric ApproachF. Goossens, H. J. Plug, Jean H. M. Wagemans. 288-294 [doi]
• Ontology-Based Approach for Mapping Concepts and Requirements from Regulations and Standards: The Case of the EU AI Act and International StandardsJulio Hernandez, Delaram Golpayegani, David Lewis 0001. 295-300 [doi]
• Impacts of Continued Legal Pre-Training and IFT on LLMs' Latent Representations of Human-Defined Legal ConceptsShaun Ho. 301-307 [doi]
• On Conflicts and Satisfiability in Metric Timed Normative LogicsKaram Younes Kharraz, Gerardo Schneider, Martin Leucker. 308-313 [doi]
• Design of a Quality Management System Based on the EU AI ActHenryk Mustroph, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma. 314-320 [doi]
• Combining Rule-Based and Machine Learning Methods for Efficient Information Extraction from Enforcement DecisionsHarry Nan, Maarten Marx, Johan Wolswinkel. 321-326 [doi]
• ConsRAG: Minimize LLM Hallucinations in the Legal DomainHa-Thanh Nguyen, Ken Satoh. 327-332 [doi]
• Legal-Emotional BATNA: AI Chatbot Addressing Divorce Legalities and Emotional Complexities, and Research of Social Implementation in JapanKohei Oshio. 333-337 [doi]
• Optimizing Keyphrase Extraction for Court Decisions Using Legal ReferencesZoltán Szoplák, Peter Gurský, Dávid Varga. 338-343 [doi]
• InSaAF: Incorporating Safety Through Accuracy and Fairness - Are LLMs Ready for the Indian Legal Domain?Yogesh Tripathi, Raghav Donakanti, Sahil Girhepuje, Ishan Kavathekar, Bhaskara Hanuma Vedula, Gokul S. Krishnan, Anmol Goel, Shreya Goyal, Balaraman Ravindran, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 344-351 [doi]
• Building Applications with Purpose: Bridging Human-Centered Design and Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in Legal Tech with the Double DiamondSabine Wehnert, Ernesto William De Luca. 352-358 [doi]
• DIREGA - Building Decision Support for German Register LawAxel Adrian, Osman Anil Basaran, Nathan Dykes, Stephanie Evert, Michael Gritz, Merlin Humml, Michael Kohlhase, Johannes Lindner, Andreas Maier, Stephan Prettner, Max Rapp, Lutz Schröder, Verena Stürmer. 360-362 [doi]
• Harmonizing AI Data Governance: Profiling ISO/IEC 5259 to Meet the Requirements of the EU AI ActKuruvilla George Aiyankovil, Dave Lewis 0001. 363-365 [doi]
• Legal Question Answering Based on Logical Reasoning in Large Pretrained Language ModelsJoseph Dimos, Eva Fourel. 366-368 [doi]
• Structured Legal Argumentation with LLMs: A Study in Landlord-Tenant LawGregoire Fournier, Daniel W. Linna Jr.. 369-371 [doi]
• A Logical Framework for Weak Permissions in Criminal ProcedureGuido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo. 372-374 [doi]
• Similar Phrases for Cause of Actions of Civil CasesHo-Chien Huang, Chao-Lin Liu. 375-377 [doi]
• A Legal Assistant for Accountable Decision-MakingAdam Kaczmarczyk, Tomer Libal, Aleksander Smywinski-Pohl. 378-380 [doi]
• Addressing Causal Puzzles in Law Through ArgumentationRuta Liepina, Giuseppe Pisano, Giovanni Sartor. 381-383 [doi]
• AI in Healthcare: Navigating Legal Risk Assessment with JusticeBotSébastien Meeùs, Valentina Dalla Giovanna, Samyar Janatian, Hannes Westermann, Karim Benyekhlef, Gregory Lewkowicz. 384-386 [doi]
• A Multi-Stage Prompting and RAG Approach to Generating Legal Analysis in Common Law SystemsTitus T. H. Ng, Tien-Hsuan Wu, Benjamin Minhao Chen, Yongxi Chen, Ben Kao. 387-388 [doi]
• Towards Hybrid Evaluation Methodologies for Large Language Models in the Legal DomainMarco Sanchi, Tereza Novotná. 389-392 [doi]
• Explainable AI for Real Legal Judgments: Sentencing Model and Salience Maps for TextHsuan-Lei Shao, Wei-Hsin Wang, Sieh-Chuen Huang. 393-394 [doi]
• A Legal Visualisation Tool Using Normative DiagramsBianca Steffes, Diogo Sasdelli. 395-397 [doi]
• TENJI: A Textbook Entity Network and Jurisprudence InterfaceSabine Wehnert, Pramod Kumar Bontha, Kilian Lüders, Bent Stohlmann, Ernesto William De Luca. 398-400 [doi]
• LUMI: Legal Understanding and Matching Through Interactive HighlightingSabine Wehnert, Visakh Padmanabhan, Ernesto William De Luca. 401-403 [doi]
• LeReRAG: Measuring Legal Relevance in Retrieval Augmented Generation ApplicationsGineke Wiggers, Christian Hartz. 404-406 [doi]