Abstract is missing.
- Development of Full Field Digital MammographyMartin J. Yaffe. 3-10 [doi]
- Initial Operating and Clinical Results of a Full Field Mammography SystemLim Cheung, Richard Bird, Ashish Chitkara, Alan Rego, Carlos Rodriguez, Jonathan Yuen. 11-18 [doi]
- Design Considerations for a CDZNTE Digital Mammography SystemJames G. Mainprize, Martin J. Yaffe, Tümay Tümer, Shi Yin, William J. Hamilton. 19-26 [doi]
- High Resolution Mammography Using a Scanned Slit Silicon Strip DetectorEric Beuville, Robert Cahn, Björn Cederström, Mats Danielsson, Bruce Hasegawa. 27-30 [doi]
- A CCD Based Digital Detector for Whole-Breast Digital MammographyLaura Smilowitz, Daniel Rosen, Hua Qian, Walter Phillips, Martin Stanton, Alex Stewart. 31-34 [doi]
- Evaluation of a Digital Mosaic Mammography ImagerVivek Swarnakar, Scott T. Smith, Myoungki Jeong, Hyunkeun Kim, Darold Wobschall. 35-38 [doi]
- Effects of Varying Exit Exposure and Energy Spectrum on the Conspicuity of Calcifications and Masses in Digitally Acquired Mammograms of Cadaveric BreastsDavid McElroy, Carolyn Kimme-Smith, Nanette Debruhl, Ilyssa Golding, John Cutrone, James W. Sayre. 39-42 [doi]
- Ultra-Small Focal Spot X-Ray Sources for High Resolution Digital MammographyAndrzej Król, Walter Huda, Craig C. Chamberlain, Jean-Claude Kieffer, Zhiming Jiang, Jangfan Yu. 43-46 [doi]
- Evaluation of a Digital Spot Mammographic Unit Using a Contrast Detail PhantomEllen Shaw de Paredes, Panos P. Fatouros, Stefan Thunberg, Joanne F. Cousins, John Wilson, Tiffany Sedgwick. 47-50 [doi]
- Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Potentially a New Method for Breast Cancer ScreeningLoren T. Niklason, Bradley T. Christian, Laura E. Niklason, Daniel B. Kopans, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Donald E. Castleberry, Beale H. Opsahl-Ong, Cynthia E. Landberg, Brian Giambattista. 51-56 [doi]
- Three-Dimensional Visualization of Breast CancerAndrew D. A. Maidment, Michael Albert, Emily F. Conant, Stephen A. Feig. 57-60 [doi]
- Detecting the Central Mass of a Spiculated Lesion Using Scale-Orientation SignaturesReyer Zwiggelaar, Susan M. Astley, Christopher J. Taylor. 63-70 [doi]
- Comparison of Methods for Combining Evidence for Spiculated LesionsTim C. Parr, Reyer Zwiggelaar, Susan M. Astley, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Christopher J. Taylor. 71-78 [doi]
- A Computer Assisted Diagnostic System for Mass DetectionWei Qian, Lihua Li 0002, Laurence P. Clarke, Fei Mao, Robert A. Clark, Captain Jerry Thomas. 79-86 [doi]
- Tumor Detection System for Full-Digital MammographyHidefumi Kobatake, Hideya Takeo, Shigeru Nawano. 87-94 [doi]
- Combining Single View Features and Asymmetry for Detection of Mass LesionsNico Karssemeijer, Guido M. te Brake. 95-102 [doi]
- Comparing Mammogram Pairs for the Detection of LesionsSiew-Li Kok-Wiles, J. Michael Brady, Ralph Highnam. 103-110 [doi]
- Determining Correspondence Between ViewsRalph Highnam, Yasuyo Kita, Michael Brady 0001, Basil Shepstone, Ruth E. English. 111-118 [doi]
- Comparison of Three Mass Detection MethodsGuido M. te Brake, Nico Karssemeijer. 119-126 [doi]
- Classifying Image Features in the Last Screening Mammograms Prior to Detection of a Malignant MassMohammad Sameti, Jacqueline Morgan-Parkes, Rabab K. Ward, Branko Palcic. 127-134 [doi]
- Detection of Spicules on Mammograms Based on a Multistage Pendulum FilterMiki Goto, Akihisa Morikawa, Hiroshi Fujita 0001, Takeshi Hara, Tokiko Endo. 135-138 [doi]
- Development of a New Algorithm for Detection of Mammographic MassesTomoko Matsubara, Hiroshi Fujita 0001, Takeshi Hara, Satoshi Kasai, Osamu Otsuka, Yuji Hatanaka, Tokiko Endo. 139-142 [doi]
- Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Digital Mammography and Ultrasound Images of Breast Mass LesionsMaryellen L. Giger, Zhimin Huo, Dulcy E. Wolverton, Carl J. Vyborny, Catherine Moran, Robert A. Schmidt, Hania A. Al-Hallaq, Robert M. Nishikawa, Kunio Doi. 143-147 [doi]
- Evaluation of a Neural Network Classifier for Detection of Microcalcifications and Opacities in Digital MammogramsJacques G. Diahi, Alain Giron, Djamel Brahmi, Christophe Frouge, Bernard Fertil. 151-156 [doi]
- Microcalcifications Detection Using Adaptive Filtering and Gaussianity TestsM. Nafi Gürcan, Yasemin Yardimci, A. Enis Çetin. 157-164 [doi]
- Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography Via the Spatial Scan Statistic with Stochastic Scan PartitionsCarey E. Priebe. 165-168 [doi]
- Improved Correction for Signal Dependent Noise Applied to Automatic Detection of MicrocalcificationsWouter J. H. Veldkamp, Nico Karssemeijer. 169-176 [doi]
- Modeling of Digital Mammograms Using Bicubic Spline Functions and Additive NoiseA. Maitournam, C. Graffigne, A. Strauss. 177-184 [doi]
- Integration of Low-Level Processing to Facilitate Microcalcification DetectionM. Poissonnier, Ralph Highnam, Michael Brady 0001, Basil Shepstone, Ruth E. English. 185-188 [doi]
- Development of a Multi-Feature Cad System for MammographyS. Brown, R. Li, L. Brandt, L. Wilson, G. Kossoff, M. Kossoff. 189-196 [doi]
- Automated Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Digitized MammogramsDaisuke Fukuoka, Satoshi Kasap, Hiroshi Fujita 0001, Takeshi Hara, Motohiro Kato, Tokiko Endo, Hitoshi Yoshimura. 197-200 [doi]
- Microcalcification Detection System for Full-Digital MammographyHidefumi Kobatake, Hideya Takeo, Shigeru Nawano. 201-204 [doi]
- Detection of Mammographic Microcalcifications Using a Statistical ModelEva Cernadas, Reyer Zwiggelaar, Wouter Veldkamp, Tim C. Parr, Susan M. Astley, Christopher J. Taylor, Caroline R. M. Boggis. 205-208 [doi]
- Detection of Subtle Microcalcifications in Digital MammogramsMurk J. Bottema, John P. Slavotinek. 209-212 [doi]
- Benefits of Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) in Mammographic Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Clustered MicrocalcificationsYulei Jiang, Robert M. Nishikawa, Robert A. Schmidt, Charles E. Metz, Maryellen L. Giger, Kunio Doi. 215-220 [doi]
- Interactive Quantitative Characterization of Micro-Calcifications on Digitized Film-Screen MammogramsRichard Lederman, Isaac Leichter, Philippe Bamberger, Boris Novak, Scott Fields, Shalom Buchbinder. 221-224 [doi]
- Automated Detection and Classification of Micro-Calcifications in Mammograms Using Artifical Neural NetsErich Sorantin, Ferdinand Schmidt, Heinz Mayer, Peter Winkler, Csaba Szepesvári. 225-232 [doi]
- Classification of Microcalcifications Using Texture-Based FeaturesDirk Meersman, Paul Scheunders, Dirk Van Dyck. 233-236 [doi]
- Evaluation of a Decision Aid for the Classification of MicrocalcifictionsPaul Taylor, John Fox, Andrew Todd-Pokropek. 237-244 [doi]
- Evidential Approach to Improved Microcalcification CharacterizationGalina L. Rogova, Paul C. Stomper, Scott Snowden, Chih-Chung Ke, Vivek Swarnakar, Tariq Hameed. 245-248 [doi]
- Comparative Evaluation of Statistical Pattern Recognition Techniques for the Classification of Breast LesionsRicardo José Ferrari, Annie France Frère, P. M. A. Marques, S. K. Kinoshita, L. A. R. Spina, R. L. Villela. 249-252 [doi]
- Detection of Breast Tumor Boundaries Using ISO-Intensity Contours and Dynamic ThresholdingDenise Guliato, Rangaraj M. Rangayyan, João Antonio Zuffo, J. E. Leo Desautels. 253-260 [doi]
- Mammographic Region of Interest Database Retrieval and Indexing EngineSrinivas Gutta, Jerzy W. Bala, Ali Hadjarian, Shirin Trachiotis, Peter Pachowicz, B. K. Gogia. 261-264 [doi]
- Quantitative Interpretation of Mammograms Based on a Physical Model of the Image Formation ProcessJean-Marc Dinten, J. M. Volle, Michel Darboux. 267-274 [doi]
- Estimating Compressed Breast ThicknessRalph Highnam, Mike Brady 0001, Basil Shepstone. 275-278 [doi]
- Sites of Occurrence of Malignancies in MammogramsSteven Caulkin, Susan M. Astley, John Asquith, Caroline R. M. Boggis. 279-282 [doi]
- Simulated Mammography Using Synthetic 3D BreastsPaul Taylor, Robyn Owens, David Ingram. 283-290 [doi]
- Anatomic Segmentation of Mammograms Via Breast ModelPredrag R. Bakic, Dragana Brzakovic, Z. Zhu. 291-294 [doi]
- Multiresolution Wavelet Approach for Separating the Breast Region from the Background in High Resolution Digital MammographyJohn J. Heine, Maria Kallergi, Steven M. Chetelat, Laurence P. Clarke. 295-298 [doi]
- The Fusion of Supervised and Unsupervised Techniques for Segmentation of Abnormal RegionsAli Hadjarian, Jerzy W. Bala, Srinivas Gutta, Shirin Trachiotis, Peter Pachowicz. 299-302 [doi]
- Mixture Modeling for Digital Mammogram Display and AnalysisStephen R. Aylward, Bradley M. Hemminger, Etta D. Pisano. 305-312 [doi]
- Display of High-Resolution Digital Mammograms on CRT MonitorsThomas Netsch, Matthias Biel, Heinz-Otto Peitgen. 313-320 [doi]
- Volume Reconstruction of Clustered Micro-Calcifications in MammogramsTim O. Müller, Rainer Stotzka, A. Hochmuth, Wolfgang Eppler, Hartmut Gemmeke. 321-328 [doi]
- Maximum Entropy Improvement of X-Ray Digital MammogramsRadu Mutihac, Alberto A. Colavita, Andres Cicuttin, Alberto E. Cerdeira. 329-336 [doi]
- Differences in Viewing Time for Mammograms Displayed on Film Versus a CRT MonitorElizabeth A. Krupenski. 337-343 [doi]
- Prompting in Mammography: How Good Must Prompt Generators Be?Susan M. Astley, Reyer Zwiggelaar, Chris Wolstenholme, Karen Davies, Tim C. Parr, Christopher J. Taylor. 347-354 [doi]
- Evaluation of a Prompting System Using Interval CancersS. Heddle, A. C. Hume, A. E. Kirkpatrick. 355-358 [doi]
- Computer-Aided Cancer Detection in the UK Breast Screening ProgrammeLinda J. Williams, Robin J. Prescott, Mark Hartswood. 359-362 [doi]
- Prompting in Practice: How Can We Ensure Radiologists Make Best Use of Computer-Aided Detection Systems in Screening Mammography?Mark Hartswood, Rob Procter, Linda J. Williams. 363-370 [doi]
- Non-Radiologists and CAD Systems in Breast Cancer ScreeningHelen C. Cowley, Alastair G. Gale. 371-374 [doi]
- CAD Implementation: Implications from Real Life Visual Search of Screening CasesM. D. Mugglestone, A. G. Gale. 375-382 [doi]
- Mammographic Screening: Sensitivity of General RadiologistsRobert A. Schmidt, Gillian M. Newstead, Michael N. Linver, G. W. Eklund. 383-388 [doi]
- Initial Clinical Experience with Full Field Digital MammographyEtta D. Pisano. 391-394 [doi]
- Clinical Results with R2 Imagechecker SystemJimmy Roehrig, Takeshi Doi, Akira Hasegawa, Bob Hunt, Julian Marshall, Harlan Romsdahl, Alex Schneider, Ron Sharbaugh, Wei Zhang. 395-400 [doi]
- Prospective Testing of a Clinical Mammography Workstation for CAD: Analysis of the First 10, 000 CasesRobert M. Nishikawa, Maryellen L. Giger, Dulcy E. Wolverton, Robert A. Schmidt, Christopher E. Comstock, John Papaioannou, Stephen A. Collins, Kunio Doi. 401-406 [doi]
- Performance Studies of a Computer-Aided Diagnostic System on MammogramsTakeshi Hara, Hiroshi Fujita 0001, Tokiko Endo, Takuji Iwase, Hitoshi Yoshimura. 407-410 [doi]
- Direct Magnification Radiography of the Breast in Combination with Computed Radiography: First Clinical ResultsChristina Hundertmark, Norbert Breitner, Monika Wiese, Matthias Funke. 411-414 [doi]
- A Framework for Computer Aided Mammographic Screening for Breast CancerFredrik Georgsson, Stina Carlson. 415-418 [doi]
- Computerized Analysis of Digitized Mammograms of Women with Low Breast Cancer Risk and of BRCA1/BRCA2 Gene-Mutation CarriersZhimin Huo, Maryellen L. Giger, Funmi I. Olopade, Dulcy E. Wolverton, Shelly Cummings. 419-422 [doi]
- Comparison of Analog and Digital Spot Magnified MammographyGillian M. Newstead, Minh-Thu Josien, Cheryl A. Gelfand, Chrystia M. Slywotzky. 423-426 [doi]
- Breast Cancer Screening ResultsIngvar Andersson. 427-433 [doi]
- Acceptance Testing and Quality Control of Digital Mammography EquipmentGordon E. Mawdsley, Martin J. Yaffe, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Loren Niklason, Mark B. Williams, Bradley M. Hemminger. 437-444 [doi]
- An Automated Quality Control Program for Whole Breast Digital Image ReceptorsCarolyn Kimme-Smith, Candace Lewis, Limin Yang, Lawrence W. Bassett. 445-448 [doi]
- Management and Lesion Detection Effects of Lossy Image Compression on Digitized MammogramsB. J. Betts, Anuradha K. Aiyer, J. Li, D. Ikeda, R. Birdwell, Robert M. Gray, Richard A. Olshen. 449-456 [doi]
- Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening MammographyM. Heath, K. Bowyer, Daniel B. Kopans, P. Kegelmeyer Jr., Richard H. Moore, K. Chang, S. Munishkumaran. 457-460 [doi]
- Image Standardization for Digital MammographyRobert P. Velthuizen, Laurence P. Clarke. 461-464 [doi]
- Automated Detection of Microcalcifications after Lossy Compression of Digital MammogramsThomas Netsch, Markus Lang, Heinz-Otto Peitgen. 465-472 [doi]
- Automatic Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications Using Morphological ReconstructionJosé Manuel Mossi, Antonio Albiol. 475-476 [doi]
- Microcalcification Evaluation Based on Shape ParametersJosep Español, C. Barceló, J. Martií, M. Osorio, S. Thió, F. Castañer, J. Forest, R. García, Joaquim Salvi. 477-478 [doi]
- An Automatic Non-Deforming Technique for Selective Microcalcifications EnhancementEva Cernadas, L. Gómez, P. G. Rodríguez, R. G. Carrión, C. Veiga, Maria Luisa Durán, Juan J. Vidal. 479-480 [doi]
- The Auto Detection of Cluster Micro-Calcifications in Digital Mammograms Using Texture EnergyA. R. Al-Hinnawi, Peter E. Undrill, G. Needham. 481-482 [doi]
- Precise Segmentation of Calcifications for Reliable Computerized DiagnosisJanne Näppi, Peter B. Dean, Tiina Ojala, Olli Nevalainen, Sakari Toikkanen. 483-484 [doi]
- Performance-Evaluation for Automated Detection of Microcalcifications in Mammograms Using Three Different Film-DigitizersPeter Winkler, Erich Sorantin, Attila Tanács, Ferdinand Schmidt, Heinz Mayer, Csaba Szepesvári. 485-486 [doi]
- A Neural Network Based Method Selecting Gabor Wavelet Filters for the Detection of MicrocalcificationsAndrea Schenone, S. Carrara, G. Mascetti. 487-488 [doi]
- Detection and Characterization of Mammographic Masses by Artificial Neural NetworkS. K. Kinoshita, P. M. A. Marques, A. F. F. Slaets, H. R. C. Marana, R. J. Ferrari. 489-490 [doi]
- Clinical Comparison of Full Breast Storage Phosphor Digital Mammography and Film-Screen Mammography - A Receiver Operating Characteristic StudyMatthew T. Freedman, Dorothy S. Artz, Jacquelyn P. Hogge, Hamid Jafroudi, Rebecca A. Zuurbier, Raj Katial, Seong K. Mun. 491-492 [doi]
- Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) of Breast-Cancer - Diagnostic Performance of a Further Improved SystemA. Hochmuth, M. Fleck, Christoph Minkus, T. Boehm, Christiane Marx, Werner A. Kaiser. 493-494 [doi]
- Comparison of Conventional and Secondarily Digitized Mammograms by ROC - Analysis to Evaluate a Computer System for Digital Routine MammographyChristiane Marx, M. Fleck, Th. Böhm, Ch. Geßner, A. Hochmuth, W. A. Kaiser. 495-496 [doi]
- 3D Reconstruction of Clusters of Mammary MicrocalcificationsRegis Gresson, Didier Wolf, Joseph Stines. 497-498 [doi]
- The Calma ProjectS. R. Amendolia, M. G. Bisogni, Ubaldo Bottigli, M. A. Ciocci, Pasquale Delogu, Maria Evelina Fantacci. 499-500 [doi]
- Are There Quantifiable Reasons for a Radiologist's Preference for an Intensity Inverted Mammogram?J. Rebecca Claesen-Finn, Andrezj S. K. Dzik-Jurasz, Amita Sharma, Richard I. Kitney. 501-502 [doi]
- The Need to Standardize and Calibrate Databases of Digitized MammogramsRamachandran Chandrasekhar, Yianni Attikiouzel. 503-504 [doi]
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Mammograms Versus Film-Screen MammogramsKimerly Powell, Nancy Obuchowski, Mary Barry, Christine Quinn, Katherine Drummond. 505-506 [doi]
- A Low Cost Computer Assisted Mammography WorkstationRainer Stotzka, Tim O. Müller, Wolfgang Eppler, Hartmut Gemmeke. 507-508 [doi]
- X-Ray Imaging with a Silicon Microstrip DetectorT. Mali, V. Cindro, M. Mikuz, U. Zdesar. 509-510 [doi]
- System Considerations for Satellite Transmission of Digitized MammogramsDonald Neth, Kimerly Powell, Nancy Obuchowski, Stefan Ganobcik, Gilda Cardinosa, William Chilcote, Robert Kerczewski, Paul Mallasch. 511-512 [doi]
- Mobile Breast Care Using DICOM Satellite Telemammography Prompt-Interpretation SystemKathryn Eike Dudding, Paul Andrews, Aiman Abdel-Malek. 513-514 [doi]