Abstract is missing.
- Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoningKevin D. Ashley. 1-10 [doi]
- Isomorphism and argumentationTrevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Thomas F. Gordon. 11-20 [doi]
- Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHRRaquel Mochales Palau, Aagje Ieven. 21-30 [doi]
- A next step towards automated modelling of sources of lawEmile de Maat, Radboud Winkels. 31-39 [doi]
- NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidationPier-Luigi Spinosa, Gerardo Giardiello, Manola Cherubini, Simone Marchi, Giulia Venturi, Simonetta Montemagni. 40-49 [doi]
- NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semanticsAlessandro Mazzei, Daniele P. Radicioni, Raffaella Brighi. 50-57 [doi]
- Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensusSindhu Joseph, Henry Prakken. 58-67 [doi]
- Formalising dynamic protocols for open agent systemsAlexander Artikis. 68-77 [doi]
- Improving the comprehension of legal documentation: the case of patent claimsNadjet Bouayad-Agha, Gerard Casamayor, Gabriela Ferraro, Simon Mille, Vanesa Vidal, Leo Wanner. 78-87 [doi]
- Segmentation of legal documentsEneldo Loza Mencía. 88-97 [doi]
- Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in textRaquel Mochales Palau, Marie-Francine Moens. 98-107 [doi]
- Why lawyers are nice (or nasty): a game-theoretical argumentation exerciseGiovanni Sartor, Michel Rudnianski, Antonino Rotolo, Régis Riveret, Eunate Mayor. 108-117 [doi]
- Case law in extended argumentation frameworksTrevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sanjay Modgil. 118-127 [doi]
- Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance reliefPhan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang, Nguyen Duy Hung. 128-136 [doi]
- Legal reasoning with argumentation schemesThomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton. 137-146 [doi]
- Intelligent hybrid approach to false identity detectionTossapon Boongoen, Qiang Shen. 147-156 [doi]
- Integrating induction and deduction for finding evidence of discriminationDino Pedreschi, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini. 157-166 [doi]
- Query-based opinion summarization for legal blog entriesJack G. Conrad, Jochen L. Leidner, Frank Schilder, Ravi Kondadadi. 167-176 [doi]
- Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support systemJohn Zeleznikow, Brooke Abrahams. 177-184 [doi]
- Reasoning with spatial plans on the semantic webRinke Hoekstra, Radboud Winkels, Erik Hupkes. 185-193 [doi]
- Human-aided computer cognition for e-discoveryChristopher Hogan, Robert Bauer, Dan Brassil. 194-201 [doi]
- Toward a general theory of document modelingMarc Lauritsen, Thomas F. Gordon. 202-211 [doi]
- A proposal for evidential reasoning about motivesFloris Bex, Katie Atkinson. 212-213 [doi]
- Plausibility schemas: templates for legal factfindingVern R. Walker. 214-215 [doi]
- Evidence transmutations: gathering admissible evidence using belief revisionMary-Anne Williams. 216-217 [doi]
- Abstract specification of legal contractsCristian Prisacariu, Gerardo Schneider. 218-219 [doi]
- Supporting of legal reasoning for cases which are not strictly regulated by lawTomasz Zurek, Emil Kruk. 220-221 [doi]
- Toward assessing law students argument diagramsCollin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven. 222-223 [doi]
- How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving?Stijn Colen, Fokie Cnossen, Bart Verheij. 224-225 [doi]
- Analyzing a complaint database by means of a genetic-based data mining algorithmJan van Dijk, Sunil Choenni, Frans Leeuw. 226-227 [doi]
- How to capture and use legal patterns in ITAlzbeta Krausová, Fabio Massacci, Ayda Saïdane. 228-229 [doi]
- e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learnedIr. R. A. Hilhorst, Tom M. van Engers. 230-231 [doi]
- Legal metadata interchange framework to match CEN metalexMonica Palmirani, Luca Cervone, Fabio Vitali. 232-233 [doi]
- Law as a seamless web?: comparison of various network representations of the United States Supreme Court corpus (1791-2005)Michael J. Bommarito II, Daniel Martin Katz, Jon Zelner. 234-235 [doi]
- The network of French legal codesPierre Mazzega, Danièle Bourcier, Romain Boulet. 236-237 [doi]
- Legal text analysis of the modification provisions: a pattern oriented approachRaffaella Brighi, Monica Palmirani. 238-239 [doi]
- Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisionsMatthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley. 240-241 [doi]