Abstract is missing.
- The discipline of information systems: Let many flowers bloom!David E. Avison, Joe Nandhakumar. 1-17
- Comments on The discipline of information systems: Let many flowers bloom! by D. E. Avison and J. NandhakumarKlaus Voss. 18-19
- Theories of meaning and different perspectives on information systemsPeter Holm, Klas Karlgren. 20-32
- Comments on Theories of meaning and different perspectives on information systems by P. Holm and K. KarlgrenRonald K. Stamper. 33-35
- Multiple relationships: an analysis of their semantics and their modellingDonal J. Flynn, David R. Knight, Alberto H. F. Laender. 36-51
- Comments on Multiple relationships: an analysis of their semantics and their modelling by D. J. Flynn, D. R. Knight and A. H. F. LaenderWolfgang Hesse. 52-53
- About a framework for information and information processing of learning systemsMatthias Rauterberg. 54-69
- Comments on About a framework for information and information processing of learning systems by M. RauterbergAlex A. Verrijn-Stuart. 70-71
- A self-descriptive conceptual schema modelling facility, its implementation and extensionMichael Björn, Hyeon Kon Kim, Ryosuke Hotaka. 72-87
- A user-centered method for the development of data-intensive dialogue systems: an object-oriented approachBettina Schewe, Klaus-Dieter Schewe. 88-103
- Comments on A user-centered method for the development of data-intensive dialogue systems: an object-oriented approach by B. Schewe and K.-D. ScheweRudi Studer. 104-105
- A meta model transformation approach towards harmonisation in information system modellingJ. L. Han Oei. 106-127
- Comments on A meta model transformation approach towards harmonisation in information system modelling by J. L. H. OeiUdo W. Lipeck. 128-129
- Limitations of information systems theory and practice: a case for pluralismChrisanthi Avgerou, Tony Cornford. 130-143
- What s in a relationship? On distinguishing property holding and object bindingSteven Kelly. 144-159
- Comments on What s in a relationship? On distinguishing property holding and object binding by S. KellyHeinrich C. Mayr. 160
- English grammar as a sentence model for conceptual modelling using NIAMJames A. Sykes. 161-176
- Comments on English grammar as a sentence model for conceptual modelling using NIAM by J. A. SykesRyosuke Hotaka. 177-178
- From information systems to knowledge systemsGerd Wagner. 179-194
- Anything, everything and things playing roles: Three realizing principles as a contribution to a platform for understandingPaul Lindgreen. 195-214
- Comments on Anything, everything and things playing roles: Three realizing principles as a contribution to a platform for understanding by P. LindgreenJames Odell. 215
- Defining quality aspects for conceptual modelsJohn Krogstie, Odd Ivar Lindland, Guttorm Sindre. 216-231
- Comments on Defining quality aspects for conceptual models by J. Krogstie, O. I. Lindland and G. SindrePentti Kerola. 232-233
- Semiotic approach for object abstractionBruce A. Calway. 234-246
- Comments on Semiotic approach for object abstraction by B. A. CalwayRonald K. Stamper. 247-249
- Abstraction and concretizing in information systems and problem domains: implications for system descriptionsJens Kaasbøll. 250-265
- Business model representationsAlex A. Verrijn-Stuart. 266-281
- Comments on Business model representations by A. A. Verrijn-StuartRoland Traunmüller. 282-283
- How should business professionals analyze information systems for themselves?Steven Alter. 284-299
- Comments on How should business professionals analyze information systems for themselves? by S. L. AlterPentti Kerola. 300-301
- How far harmonisation? (Panel discussion set-up)Eckhard D. Falkenberg. 302
- Position paper on How far harmonisation? Ryosuke Hotaka. 303-304
- Position paper on How far harmonisation? James Odell. 305-308
- Position paper on How far harmonisation? Arne Sølvberg. 309-310
- Position paper on How far harmonisation? : Information system modelling myopiaRonald K. Stamper. 311-315