Analysis of Clinical Discussions Based on Argumentation Schemes

Malik Al Qassas, Daniela Fogli, Massimiliano Giacomin, Giovanni Guida. Analysis of Clinical Discussions Based on Argumentation Schemes. In Maria Manuela Cruz-Cunha, João Eduardo Quintela Varajão, Rui Rijo, Ricardo Martinho, Petra Schubert, Albert Boonstra, Ricardo Correia 0001, Alexander Berler, editors, Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems/International Conference on Project MANagement/Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies, CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist 2015, Vilamoura, Portugal, October 7-9, 2015. Volume 64 of Procedia Computer Science, pages 282-289, Elsevier, 2015. [doi]

@inproceedings{QassasFGG15,
  title = {Analysis of Clinical Discussions Based on Argumentation Schemes},
  author = {Malik Al Qassas and Daniela Fogli and Massimiliano Giacomin and Giovanni Guida},
  year = {2015},
  doi = {10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.491},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.491},
  researchr = {https://researchr.org/publication/QassasFGG15},
  cites = {0},
  citedby = {0},
  pages = {282-289},
  booktitle = {Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems/International Conference on Project MANagement/Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies, CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist 2015, Vilamoura, Portugal, October 7-9, 2015},
  editor = {Maria Manuela Cruz-Cunha and João Eduardo Quintela Varajão and Rui Rijo and Ricardo Martinho and Petra Schubert and Albert Boonstra and Ricardo Correia 0001 and Alexander Berler},
  volume = {64},
  series = {Procedia Computer Science},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
}