The following publications are possibly variants of this publication:
- An Equilibrium Analysis of Competing Double Auction Marketplaces Using Fictitious PlayBing Shi, Enrico H. Gerding, Perukrishnen Vytelingum, Nicholas R. Jennings. ecai 2010: 575-580 [doi]
- An equilibrium analysis of market selection strategies and fee strategies in competing double auction marketplacesBing Shi, Enrico H. Gerding, Perukrishnen Vytelingum, Nicholas R. Jennings. AAMAS, 26(2):245-287, 2013. [doi]
- Bidding with Fees and Setting Effective Fees in a Double Auction MarketplaceBing Shi. pricai 2014: 640-653 [doi]
- A game-theoretic analysis of market selection strategies for competing double auction marketplacesBing Shi, Enrico H. Gerding, Perukrishnen Vytelingum, Nicholas R. Jennings. atal 2010: 857-864 [doi]
- Analysis and design of competing double auction marketplacesBing Shi. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, UK, 2011. [doi]
- A Game-Theoretical Analysis of Charging Strategies for Competing Double Auction MarketplacesBing Shi, Xiao Li. eumas 2020: 100-115 [doi]
- Setting an Effective Pricing Policy for Double Auction MarketplacesBing Shi, Yalong Huang, Shengwu Xiong, Enrico H. Gerding. pricai 2016: 457-471 [doi]
- An equilibrium analysis of trading across multiple double auction marketplaces using fictitious playBing Shi, Enrico H. Gerding, Nicholas R. Jennings. ecra, 17:134-149, 2016. [doi]
- Competing sellers in online markets: reserve prices, shill bidding, and auction feesEnrico H. Gerding, Alex Rogers, Rajdeep K. Dash, Nicholas R. Jennings. atal 2006: 1208-1210 [doi]
- Competing Sellers in Online Markets: Reserve Prices, Shill Bidding, and Auction FeesEnrico H. Gerding, Alex Rogers, Rajdeep K. Dash, Nicholas R. Jennings. atal 2007: 189-203 [doi]