The following publications are possibly variants of this publication:
- Micro law: patenting computerized methods of doing businessRichard H. Stern. micro, 16(6):4-6, 1996. [doi]
- Amazon s One-Click Patent Loses Its Teeth (Micro Law)Richard H. Stern. micro, 21(2):7-10, 2001. [doi]
- The PTO on software patentsRichard H. Stern. micro, 15(4):2-3, 1995. [doi]
- Patenting software, revisitedRichard H. Stern. micro, 16(2):5, 1996. [doi]
- What Kinds of Computer-Software-Related Advances (if Any) Are Eligible for Patents? Part II: The Useful Arts RequirementRichard Stern. micro, 28(5):64-70, 2008. [doi]
- What Kinds of Computer-Software-Related Advances (if Any) Are Eligible for Patents? Part IRichard Stern. micro, 28(4):91-96, 2008. [doi]
- Alice v. CLS Bank: Are US Business-Method and Software Patents Doomed? Part 1Richard H. Stern. micro, 34(5):64-69, 2014. [doi]
- Alice v. CLS Bank: Are US Business-Method and Software Patents Doomed? Part 2Richard H. Stern. micro, 34(6):98, 2014. [doi]
- Micro law-glitches left in software copyright systemRichard H. Stern. micro, 13(3):75-77, 1993. [doi]
- Micro LawRichard H. Stern. micro, 14(3):4-6, 1994. [doi]
- Micro LawRichard H. Stern. micro, 14(5):5-6, 1994. [doi]