Journal: Argument & Computation

Volume 9, Issue 3

177 -- 192Stergos D. Afantenos, Andreas Peldszus, Manfred Stede. Comparing decoding mechanisms for parsing argumentative structures
193 -- 222Kieran O'Halloran. Digitally deconstructing 'straw man' and 'wicker man' arguments: A software-aided pedagogy
223 -- 248Sylvie Doutre, Jean-Guy Mailly. Constraints and changes: A survey of abstract argumentation dynamics
249 -- 267Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang. Representing the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks based on arguments and attacks

Volume 9, Issue 2

73 -- 75Floriana Grasso, Nancy L. Green. Special issue: CMNA coming of age: 18 years of the Computational Models of Natural Argument workshop
77 -- 89Jodi Schneider, Sally Jackson. Modeling the invention of a new inference rule: The case of 'Randomized Clinical Trial' as an argument scheme for medical science
91 -- 119Thomas F. Gordon, Horst Friedrich, Douglas Walton. Representing argumentation schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)
121 -- 135Nancy L. Green. Towards mining scientific discourse using argumentation schemes
137 -- 154Patrick Saint-Dizier. A two-level approach to generate synthetic argumentation reports
155 -- 175Randy Allen Harris, Chrysanne Di Marco, Sebastian Ruan, Cliff O'Reilly. An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures

Volume 9, Issue 1

1 -- 14Marie-Francine Moens. Argumentation mining: How can a machine acquire common sense and world knowledge?
15 -- 40Anthony Hunter. Towards a framework for computational persuasion with applications in behaviour change
41 -- 72Rémi Brochenin, Thomas Linsbichler, Marco Maratea, Johannes Peter Wallner, Stefan Woltran. Abstract solvers for Dung's argumentation frameworks