- Mingkui Yang, Chunying Qiu, Weihan Wang, Xinchao Yang, Qiang Xu. Neural correlates of how different emotional reactions elicited by emojis influence facial expression processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 177:108903, 2026.
- Bui Nhat Vuong. The impact of generative artificial intelligence usage on job performance through job crafting and work engagement: Does digital competence matter?. Computers in Human Behavior, 178:108921, 2026.
- Jennifer Klütsch, Verena Zimmermann, Sabine J. Schlittmeier. Choose to think: Nudging towards privacy informed decisions at the app download stage. Computers in Human Behavior, 177:108895, 2026.
- Siyuan Xu, Donghui Yang. How does physician stress impact knowledge-sharing behaviors?Evidence from online physician communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 175:108849, 2026.
- Brooklyn J. Corbett, Jason M. Tangen. AI tutors vs. tenacious myths: Evidence from personalised dialogue interventions in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 175:108828, 2026.
- Chenae Christensen-Duerden, Sarah M. Coyne, Peter Reschke, Sarah Ashby, Boston Park, Ashton K. Allen, Rachel J. Munk, Hailey G. Holmgren. Digital pacifiers: Developmental trajectories of media emotion regulation in early childhood. Computers in Human Behavior, 181:108979, 2026.
- Christian von Sikorski, Pascal Merz, Raffael Heiss, Michaela Bassler, Clara Buyny, Svenja Hildebrand, Christoph Streller, Evelyn Wicki. Both AI-generated and human influencers can correct misinformation: Investigating the effectiveness of corrections for polarized and non-polarized issues. Computers in Human Behavior, 176:108845, 2026.
- Sungkyung Kim, Hee Jung Hong. Official onsite event versus unofficial streaming: Understanding the wellbeing formation in esports spectatorship. Computers in Human Behavior, 179:108950, 2026.
- Márk Miskolczi. The illusion of reality: How AI-generated images (AIGIs) are fooling social media users. Computers in Human Behavior, 176:108876, 2026.
- Mengyao Xu, Fritz Cropp, Glen T. Cameron. Talking past each other in the cultural war area: Testing the efficacy of the moral attitude dynamic model to achieve accurate disagreement. Computers in Human Behavior, 176:108873, 2026.