Journal: J. Informetrics

Volume 12, Issue 4

1015 -- 1030Ruben Miranda, Esther García-Carpintero. Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers
1031 -- 1041Mike Thelwall. Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries
1042 -- 1058Luciano Rossi, Rafael J. P. Damaceno, Igor Leite Freire, Etelvino J. H. Bechara, Jesús P. Mena-Chalco. Topological metrics in academic genealogy graphs
1059 -- 1062Peter Van den Besselaar, Ulf Sandström. Quantity matters, but how does it work?: A comment on Lindahl
1063 -- 1071Jonathan Adams 0001. Information and misinformation in bibliometric time-trend analysis
1072 -- 1088Manolis Antonoyiannakis. Impact Factors and the Central Limit Theorem: Why citation averages are scale dependent
1089 -- 1098Guoyan Wang, Guangyuan Hu, Chuanfeng Li, Li Tang. Long live the scientists: Tracking the scientific fame of great minds in physics
1099 -- 1117Yi Zhang, Jie Lu 0001, Feng Liu 0003, Qian Liu, Alan L. Porter, Hongshu Chen, Guangquan Zhang 0001. Does deep learning help topic extraction? A kernel k-means clustering method with word embedding
1118 -- 1132Eustache Mêgnigbêto. Modelling the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships with game theory: Core, Shapley value and nucleolus as indicators of synergy within an innovation system
1133 -- 1145Zhigang Hu, Wencan Tian, Shenmeng Xu, Chunbo Zhang, Xianwen Wang. Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI's selection of highly cited papers
1146 -- 1159Zhifeng Yin, Zheng Liang, Qiang Zhi. Does the concentration of scientific research funding in institutions promote knowledge output?
1160 -- 1177Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduña-Malea, Mike Thelwall, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories
1178 -- 1181Kun Chen, Yao-yao Song, Guo Liang Yang. Quality and quantity are not always positively correlated: A case study of Chinese economics journals
1182 -- 1193Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Lin Zhang 0004. A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list
1194 -- 1198Jonas Lindahl. Predicting research excellence at the individual level with bibliometric indicators: A rejoinder on a comment by Van den Besselaar and Sandström (2018)
1199 -- 1222Inchae Park, Byungun Yoon. Technological opportunity discovery for technological convergence based on the prediction of technology knowledge flow in a citation network
1223 -- 1231Jordan A. Comins, Stephanie A. Carmack, Loet Leydesdorff. Patent citation spectroscopy (PCS): Online retrieval of landmark patents based on an algorithmic approach
1232 -- 1234Thed N. van Leeuwen. Measuring Research: What Everyone Needs to Know, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Vincent Larivière, Oxford University Press (2018)
1235 -- 1250Samira El Gibari, Trinidad Gómez, Francisco Ruiz 0002. Evaluating university performance using reference point based composite indicators
1251 -- 1262Félix de Moya Anegón, Vicente P. Guerrero Bote, Carmen López-Illescas, Henk F. Moed. Statistical relationships between corresponding authorship, international co-authorship and citation impact of national research systems
1263 -- 1281Armando Calabrese, Guendalina Capece, Roberta Costa, Francesca Di Pillo, Stefania Giuffrida. A 'power law' based method to reduce size-related bias in indicators of knowledge performance: An application to university research assessment
1282 -- 1295Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel. The bibliometric quotient (BQ), or how to measure a researcher's performance capacity: A Bayesian Poisson Rasch model
1296 -- 1311Selcuk Besir Demir. Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?
1312 -- 1326Dengsheng Wu, Lili Yuan, Ruoyun Li, Jianping Li. Decomposing inequality in research funding by university-institute sub-group: A three-stage nested Theil index
1327 -- 1329Jonas Lindahl. Erratum to "Predicting research excellence at the individual level: The importance of publication rate, top journal publications, and top 10% publications in the case of early career mathematicians" [J. Informetr. 12 (2) (2018) 518-533]

Volume 12, Issue 3

567 -- 578Carlos García-Zorita, Ronald Rousseau, Sergio Marugan-Lazaro, Elías Sanz-Casado. Ranking dynamics and volatility
579 -- 589José Luis Ortega. The life cycle of altmetric impact: A longitudinal study of six metrics from PlumX
590 -- 597Giovanni Abramo. Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement
598 -- 604Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx. Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics
605 -- 617Houqiang Yu, Shenmeng Xu, Tingting Xiao. Is there Lingua Franca in informal scientific communication? Evidence from language distribution of scientific tweets
618 -- 630Ling (Alice) Jiang, Nibing Zhu, Zhilin Yang, Shen Xu, Minjoon Jun. The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination
631 -- 655Marcel Dunaiski, Jaco Geldenhuys, Willem Visser. How to evaluate rankings of academic entities using test data
656 -- 678Raj Kumar Pan, Alexander M. Petersen, Fabio Pammolli, Santo Fortunato. The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network
679 -- 702Marcel Dunaiski, Jaco Geldenhuys, Willem Visser. Author ranking evaluation at scale
703 -- 705Peter Ingwersen. Becoming Metric-Wise: A Bibliometric Guide for Researchers, Ronald Rousseau, Leo Egghe and Raf Guns, Elsevier/Chandos Publishing (2018) 385 pages
706 -- 717Qing Ke. Comparing scientific and technological impact of biomedical research
718 -- 731Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro, Ricardo Brito. Technological research in the EU is less efficient than the world average. EU research policy risks Europeans' future
732 -- 735Lawrence J. Smolinsky, Brian D. Marx. Odds ratios, risk ratios, and Bornmann and Haunschild's new indicators
736 -- 756Zhiya Zuo, Kang Zhao. The more multidisciplinary the better? - The prevalence and interdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions
757 -- 783Darko Hric, Kimmo Kaski, Mikko Kivelä. Stochastic block model reveals maps of citation patterns and their evolution in time
784 -- 805Xi Xiong, Guo Liang Yang, Zhong-cheng Guan. Assessing R&D efficiency using a two-stage dynamic DEA model: A case study of research institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences
806 -- 818Benedetto Lepori, Michael Thelwall, Bareerah Hafeez Hoorania. Which US and European Higher Education Institutions are visible in ResearchGate and what affects their RG score?
819 -- 841Alberto Martín-Martín, Rodrigo Costas, Thed N. van Leeuwen, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar. Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: A large-scale analysis
842 -- 857Xiaojun Hu, Ronald Rousseau. A new approach to explore the knowledge transition path in the evolution of science & technology: From the biology of restriction enzymes to their application in biotechnology
858 -- 867Jue Wang 0009, Liwei Zhang. Proximal advantage in knowledge diffusion: The time dimension
868 -- 892Javier Ruiz-Castillo, Rodrigo Costas. Individual and field citation distributions in 29 broad scientific fields
893 -- 905Yanhua Lv, Ying Ding, Min Song, Zhiguang Duan. Topology-driven trend analysis for drug discovery
906 -- 930Iman Tahamtan, Lutz Bornmann. Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?
931 -- 949Lutz Bornmann, Jonathan Adams 0001, Loet Leydesdorff. The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK
950 -- 959Jens Peter Andersen, Mathias Wullum Nielsen. Google Scholar and Web of Science: Examining gender differences in citation coverage across five scientific disciplines
960 -- 971Fereshteh Didegah, Niels Mejlgaard, Mads Peter Sørensen. Investigating the quality of interactions and public engagement around scientific papers on Twitter
972 -- 984Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall. Can Microsoft Academic help to assess the citation impact of academic books?
985 -- 997Weishu Liu, Guangyuan Hu, Li Tang. Missing author address information in Web of Science - An explorative study
998 -- 1011Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild. Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family and its use with altmetrics data
1012 -- 1014Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Rüdiger Mutz. MHq indicators for zero-inflated count data - A response to Smolinsky and Marx (2018)

Volume 12, Issue 2

401 -- 415Gabriel-Alexandru Vîiu. The lognormal distribution explains the remarkable pattern documented by characteristic scores and scales in scientometrics
416 -- 429Andrey Subochev, Fuad Aleskerov, Vladimir Pislyakov. Ranking journals using social choice theory methods: A novel approach in bibliometrics
430 -- 435Mike Thelwall. Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?
436 -- 447Robin Haunschild, Hermann Schier, Werner Marx, Lutz Bornmann. Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting
448 -- 460Dengsheng Wu, Jing Li, Xiaoli Lu, Jianping Li. Journal editorship index for assessing the scholarly impact of academic institutions: An empirical analysis in the field of economics
461 -- 480Henry Small. Characterizing highly cited method and non-method papers using citation contexts: The role of uncertainty
481 -- 493Xuelian Pan, Erjia Yan, Ming Cui, Weina Hua. Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools
494 -- 509Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduña-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar. Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community
510 -- 517Casilda Lasso de La Vega, Oscar Volij. Ranking scholars: A measure representation
518 -- 533Jonas Lindahl. Predicting research excellence at the individual level: The importance of publication rate, top journal publications, and top 10% publications in the case of early career mathematicians
534 -- 540Paul Wouters. The failure of a paradigm
541 -- 546Henk F. Moed. Towards a multi-paradigmatic, value free informetrics: A reply to Paul Wouters' book review "The failure of a paradigm"
547 -- 566György Csomós. A spatial scientometric analysis of the publication output of cities worldwide

Volume 12, Issue 1

1 -- 9Mike Thelwall. Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis
10 -- 30Guo Liang Yang, Hirofumi Fukuyama, Yao-yao Song. Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model
31 -- 41Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro, Ricardo Brito. Double rank analysis for research assessment
42 -- 58Susana Sánchez-Gil, Juan Gorraiz, David Melero-Fuentes. Reference density trends in the major disciplines
59 -- 73Kevin W. Boyack, Nees Jan van Eck, Giovanni Colavizza, Ludo Waltman. Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis
74 -- 86Yaniv Reingewertz, Carmela Lutmar. Academic in-group bias: An empirical examination of the link between author and journal affiliation
87 -- 100Kai Li 0010, Erjia Yan. Co-mention network of R packages: Scientific impact and clustering structure
101 -- 112Giangiacomo Bravo, Mike Farjam, Francisco Grimaldo-Moreno, Aliaksandr Birukou, Flaminio Squazzoni. Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals
113 -- 132Nadine Rons. Bibliometric approximation of a scientific specialty by combining key sources, title words, authors and references
133 -- 152Peter Sjögårde, Per Ahlgren. Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of topics
153 -- 157Zhesi Shen, Liying Yang, Jinshan Wu. Lognormal distribution of citation counts is the reason for the relation between Impact Factors and Citation Success Index
158 -- 180Chaomei Chen, Min Song, Go Eun Heo. A scalable and adaptive method for finding semantically equivalent cue words of uncertainty
181 -- 190Daniel T. Citron, Samuel F. Way. Network assembly of scientific communities of varying size and specificity
191 -- 202Zohreh Zahedi, Stefanie Haustein. On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications
203 -- 216Iman Tahamtan, Lutz Bornmann. Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature
217 -- 236Jaehyeong An, Kyuwoong Kim, Letizia Mortara, Sungjoo Lee. Deriving technology intelligence from patents: Preposition-based semantic analysis
237 -- 248Mike Thelwall, Tamara Nevill. Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?
249 -- 258Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo. Who benefits from a country's scientific research?
259 -- 270Chung-Huei Kuan, Mu-Hsuan Huang, Dar-Zen Chen. Missing links: Timing characteristics and their implications for capturing contemporaneous technological developments
271 -- 286Chao Yang, Cui Huang, Jun Su. An improved SAO network-based method for technology trend analysis: A case study of graphene
287 -- 298Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall, Mahshid Abdoli. Can Microsoft Academic assess the early citation impact of in-press articles? A multi-discipline exploratory analysis
299 -- 314Li Zhai, Xiangbin Yan, Guojing Zhang. Bi-directional h-index: A new measure of node centrality in weighted and directed networks
315 -- 329Ricardo Brito, Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro. Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis
330 -- 343Paul Donner. Effect of publication month on citation impact
344 -- 364Meijun Liu, Xiao Hu, Yuandi Wang, Dongbo Shi. Survive or perish: Investigating the life cycle of academic journals from 1950 to 2013 using survival analysis methods
365 -- 384Ulf Sandström, Peter Van den Besselaar. Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems
385 -- 400Weiwei Yan, Yin Zhang. Research universities on the ResearchGate social networking site: An examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks formed