Journal: Mathematical Social Sciences

Volume 63, Issue 2

65 -- 67Jean-François Laslier. Introduction to the Special Issue 'Around the Cambridge Compromise: Apportionment in theory and practice'
68 -- 73Geoffrey R. Grimmett. European apportionment via the Cambridge Compromise
74 -- 77Andrew Duff. Finding the balance of power in a post-national democracy
78 -- 84Axel Moberg. EP seats: The politics behind the math
85 -- 89Richard Rose, Patrick Bernhagen, Gabriela Borz. Evaluating competing criteria for allocating parliamentary seats
90 -- 93Jean-François Laslier. Why not proportional?
94 -- 101Wojciech Slomczynski, Karol Zyczkowski. Mathematical aspects of degressive proportionality
102 -- 106Thomas Kellermann. The minimum-based procedure: A principled way to allocate seats in the European Parliament
107 -- 113Paolo Serafini. Allocation of the EU Parliament seats via integer linear programming and revised quotas
114 -- 120V. Ramírez-González, José Martínez-Aroza, A. Márquez García. Spline methods for degressive proportionality in the composition of the European Parliament
121 -- 129Jan Florek. A numerical method to determine a degressive proportional distribution of seats in the European Parliament
130 -- 135Victoriano Ramírez-González. Seat distribution in the European Parliament according to the Treaty of Lisbon
136 -- 140Geoffrey R. Grimmett, K.-F. Oelbermann, Friedrich Pukelsheim. A power-weighted variant of the EU27 Cambridge Compromise
141 -- 151Antonin Macé, Rafael Treibich. Computing the optimal weights in a utilitarian model of apportionment
152 -- 158László Á. Kóczy. Beyond Lisbon: Demographic trends and voting power in the European Union Council of Ministers
159 -- 173Michel Le Breton, Maria Montero, Vera Zaporozhets. Voting power in the EU council of ministers and fair decision making in distributive politics
174 -- 180Nicola Maaser, Stefan Napel. A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting
181 -- 191Gabrielle Demange. On party-proportional representation under district distortions