Journal: Scientometrics

Volume 129, Issue 1

1 -- 29Wan Siti Nur Aiza, Liyana Shuib, Norisma Idris, Nur Baiti Afini Normadhi. Features, techniques and evaluation in predicting articles' citations: a review from years 2010-2023
31 -- 63Michael Färber 0001, Lazaros Tampakis. Analyzing the impact of companies on AI research based on publications
65 -- 93John P. Nelson, Barry Bozeman, Stuart Bretschneider, Spencer L. Lindsay. How do academic public administration and public policy researchers affect policymaking? Functional groupings from survey data
95 -- 125Mad Khir Johari Abdullah Sani, Sharunizam Shari, Noor Zaidi Sahid, Norshila Shaifuddin, Zuraidah Abdul Manaf, Alexander van Servellen. ASEAN Library and Information Science (LIS) research (2018-2022): a bibliometric analysis with strategies for enhanced global impact
127 -- 146Angelo M. Solarino, Elizabeth L. Rose, Cristian Luise. Going complex or going easy? The impact of research questions on citations
147 -- 179Kjersten Bunker Whittington, Molly M. King, Isabella Cingolani. Structure, status, and span: gender differences in co-authorship networks across 16 region-subject pairs (2009-2013)
181 -- 235Danielle H. Lee. Exploring the determinants of research performance for early-career researchers: a literature review
237 -- 260Shlomit Hadad, Noa Aharony, Daphne R. Raban. Policy shaping the impact of open-access publications: a longitudinal assessment
261 -- 287Mahsa Amiri, Maryam Yaghtin, Hajar Sotudeh. How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers
289 -- 320Donna K. Ginther, Carlos Zambrana, Patricia Oslund, Wan-Ying Chang. Do two wrongs make a right? Measuring the effect of publications on science careers
321 -- 372Laurent Linnemer. A menagerie of rankings: a look in RePEc's factory
373 -- 400Alberto Baccini, Federica Baccini, Lucio Barabesi, Martina Cioni, Eugenio Petrovich, Daria Pignalosa. Fine-grained classification of journal articles based on multiple layers of information through similarity network fusion: The case of the Cambridge Journal of Economics
401 -- 429Marco Schirone. The formation of a field: sustainability science and its leading journals
431 -- 443Ho Fai Chan, Ella Hugo, Benno Torgler. Tracking a "radioactive tracer": laziness in academia
445 -- 471Qian Wang, Guangwei Hu. Expressions of confusion in research articles: a diachronic cross-disciplinary investigation
473 -- 495Yang Zhang, Yinghua Xie, Longfei Li, Yian Liang, Houqiang Yu. How is public discussion as reflected in WeChat articles different from scholarly research in China? An empirical study of metaverse
497 -- 518Katerina Guba. Why do sociologists on academic periphery willingly support bibliometric indicators?
519 -- 536Fei Shu, Vincent Larivière. The oligopoly of open access publishing
537 -- 559Enrique Orduña-Malea, Núria Bautista-Puig. Research assessment under debate: disentangling the interest around the DORA declaration on Twitter
561 -- 580Alex J. Yang, Hongcun Gong, Yuhao Wang, Chao Zhang, Sanhong Deng. Rescaling the disruption index reveals the universality of disruption distributions in science
581 -- 600Louis-Stéphane Le Clercq. ABCal: a Python package for author bias computation and scientometric plotting for reviews and meta-analyses
601 -- 639Christian Leibel, Lutz Bornmann. What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature
641 -- 662Yongzhen Wang. Comparison of citation impact between pre-and post-publication peer-selected best papers: the case of Best Paper Awards recipients at computer science conferences
663 -- 679Jianan Huang. Diagnosing the declining industry sponsorship in clinical research
681 -- 692Hui Li, Xingmei Zhang. Dr. Anonymous is still there: a revisit of legal scholarly publishing
693 -- 703Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Neil J. Vickers, Serhii Nazarovets. From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper
705 -- 711Serhii Nazarovets. Visualization of rank-citation curves for fast detection of h-index anomalies in university metrics
713 -- 718Frode Eika Sandnes. Can we identify prominent scholars using ChatGPT?