1319 | -- | 1346 | Guan-Can Yang, Gang Li, Chun-Ya Li, Yun-hua Zhao, Jing Zhang, Tong Liu, Dar-Zen Chen, Mu-Hsuan Huang. Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value |
1347 | -- | 1387 | Therese Söderlund, Guy Madison. Characteristics of gender studies publications: a bibliometric analysis based on a Swedish population database |
1389 | -- | 1398 | Silje Lundgren, Margrit Shildrick, David Lawrence. Rethinking bibliometric data concerning gender studies: a response to Söderlund and Madison |
1399 | -- | 1439 | Sungmin Park. The R&D logic model: Does it really work? An empirical verification using successive binary logistic regression models |
1441 | -- | 1451 | Loet Leydesdorff. Can technology life-cycles be indicated by diversity in patent classifications? The crucial role of variety |
1453 | -- | 1467 | Bart Thijs, Lin Zhang 0004, Wolfgang Glänzel. Bibliographic coupling and hierarchical clustering for the validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes |
1469 | -- | 1490 | Wei-Dong Zhu, Fang Liu, Yu-Wang Chen, Jian-Bo Yang, Dong-Ling Xu, Dong-peng Wang. Research project evaluation and selection: an evidential reasoning rule-based method for aggregating peer review information with reliabilities |
1491 | -- | 1525 | Jennifer Stevenson, Jin Zhang. A temporal analysis of institutional repository research |
1527 | -- | 1552 | XiangFeng Meng, Xinhai Liu, Yunhai Tong, Wolfgang Glänzel, Shaohua Tan. Multi-view clustering with exemplars for scientific mapping |
1553 | -- | 1576 | Kamal Badar, Julie M. Hite, Naeem Ashraf. Knowledge network centrality, formal rank and research performance: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects |
1577 | -- | 1604 | Sophia R. Goldberg, Hannah Anthony, Tim S. Evans. Modelling citation networks |
1605 | -- | 1634 | Lu An, Xia Lin, Chuanming Yu, Xinwen Zhang. Measuring and visualizing the contributions of Chinese and American LIS research institutions to emerging themes and salient themes |
1635 | -- | 1651 | Hamid R. Jamali, Majid Nabavi. Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields |
1653 | -- | 1664 | Tolga Yuret. Interfield comparison of academic output by using department level data |
1665 | -- | 1677 | Charles H. Smith, Patrick Georges, Ngoc Nguyen. Statistical tests for 'related records' search results |
1679 | -- | 1697 | Munan Li. A novel three-dimension perspective to explore technology evolution |
1699 | -- | 1719 | Juan Gorraiz, Christian Gumpenberger. A flexible bibliometric approach for the assessment of professorial appointments |
1721 | -- | 1741 | Chipo Chimhundu, Kylie de Jager, Tania S. Douglas. Sectoral collaboration networks for cardiovascular medical device development in South Africa |
1743 | -- | 1762 | Rok Blagus, Brane Leskosek, Janez Stare. Comparison of bibliometric measures for assessing relative importance of researchers |
1763 | -- | 1779 | Diego R. Amancio. Comparing the topological properties of real and artificially generated scientific manuscripts |
1781 | -- | 1786 | B. Pritychenko. Intriguing trends in nuclear physics authorship |
1787 | -- | 1807 | Fabio Landini, Franco Malerba, Roberto Mavilia. The structure and dynamics of networks of scientific collaborations in Northern Africa |
1809 | -- | 1831 | Ole Ellegaard, Johan A. Wallin. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? |
1833 | -- | 1848 | Pei-Shan Chi. Changing publication and citation patterns in political science in Germany |
1849 | -- | 1866 | Enrique Orduña-Malea, Selenay Aytac. Revealing the online network between university and industry: the case of Turkey |
1867 | -- | 1873 | Si Shen, Ronald Rousseau, Dongbo Wang, Danhao Zhu, Huoyu Liu, Ruilun Liu. Editorial delay and its relation to subsequent citations: the journals Nature, Science and Cell |
1875 | -- | 1887 | Ping Zhou, Xiaozan Lv. Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics |
1889 | -- | 1909 | Wenqiang Fan. Contribution of the institutional repositories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to the webometric indicators of their home institutions |
1911 | -- | 1929 | Gianfranco Ennas, Battista Biggio, Maria Chiara Di Guardo. Data-driven journal meta-ranking in business and management |
1931 | -- | 1952 | Cornelius J. König, Clemens Fell, Linus Kellnhofer, Gabriel Schui. Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology? |
1953 | -- | 1984 | Xuan Liu, Shan Jiang, Hsinchun Chen, Catherine A. Larson, Mihail C. Roco. Modeling knowledge diffusion in scientific innovation networks: an institutional comparison between China and US with illustration for nanotechnology |
1985 | -- | 1995 | Xiaotian Chen. Questionable University-sponsored supplements in high-impact journals |
1997 | -- | 2003 | Lutz Bornmann, Johann Bauer. Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers' database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany |
2005 | -- | 2022 | Ying Huang, Jannik Schuehle, Alan L. Porter, Jan L. Youtie. A systematic method to create search strategies for emerging technologies based on the Web of Science: illustrated for 'Big Data' |
2023 | -- | 2034 | Lisa Geraci, Steve Balsis, Alexander Busch. Gender and the h index in psychology |
2035 | -- | 2056 | Wei Du, Raymond Yiu-Keung Lau, Jian Ma, Wei Xu. A multi-faceted method for science classification schemes (SCSs) mapping in networking scientific resources |
2057 | -- | 2069 | Jesús Rey-Rocha, Irene López-Navarro, M. Teresa Antonio-García. Opening doors to basic-clinical collaboration and translational research will improve researchers' performance |
2071 | -- | 2087 | Yu-wei Chang, Mu-Hsuan Huang, Chiao-Wen Lin. Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses |
2089 | -- | 2108 | Antonia Ferrer-Sapena, Enrique Alfonso Sánchez Pérez, Luis-Millán González, Fernanda Peset, Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent. Mathematical properties of weighted impact factors based on measures of prestige of the citing journals |
2109 | -- | 2135 | Regina Negri Pagani, João Luiz Kovaleski, Luis Mauricio Resende. Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication |
2137 | -- | 2147 | Ding-Wei Huang. Temporal evolution of multi-author papers in basic sciences from 1960 to 2010 |
2149 | -- | 2178 | Benedetto Lepori, Valerio Veglio, Barbara Heller-Schuh, Thomas Scherngell, Michael J. Barber. Participations to European Framework Programs of higher education institutions and their association with organizational characteristics |
2179 | -- | 2196 | Shamsul Arifeen Khan Mamun, Mohammad Mafizur Rahman. Is there any feedback effect between academic research publication and research collaboration? Evidence from an Australian university |
2197 | -- | 2214 | Loet Leydesdorff. Can intellectual processes in the sciences also be simulated? The anticipation and visualization of possible future states |
2215 | -- | 2235 | Ho Fai Chan, Ali Sina Önder, Benno Torgler. Do Nobel laureates change their patterns of collaboration following prize reception? |
2237 | -- | 2248 | Hajar Sotudeh, Zahra Mazarei, Mahdieh Mirzabeigi. CiteULike bookmarks are correlated to citations at journal and author levels in library and information science |
2249 | -- | 2251 | Khaled Moustafa. Is there bias in editorial choice? Yes |
2253 | -- | 2254 | Omid Mahian, Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi, Giulio Lorenzini, Somchai Wongwises. Fame bias in editorial choice: Yes or No? |
2255 | -- | 2257 | Daniel David, Petre T. Frangopol. The lost paradise, the original sin, and the Dodo bird: a scientometrics Sapere Aude manifesto as a reply to the Leiden manifesto on scientometrics |
2259 | -- | 2270 | Anne-Wil Harzing. Health warning: might contain multiple personalities - the problem of homonyms in Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators |
2271 | -- | 2272 | Khaled Moustafa. Don't infer anything from unavailable data |