1 | -- | 16 | Thed N. van Leeuwen, Erik Van Wijk, Paul F. Wouters. Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university |
17 | -- | 40 | Yutao Sun, Seamus Grimes. The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis |
41 | -- | 50 | Xiaoxi Ling, Yu Liu, Zhen Huang, Parantu K. Shah, Cheng Li. A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literatures |
51 | -- | 65 | Henk F. Moed. Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: the case of two SNIP versions |
67 | -- | 90 | Finn Valentin, Maria Theresa Norn, Lars Alkaersig. Orientations and outcome of interdisciplinary research: the case of research behaviour in translational medical science |
91 | -- | 104 | Darrin J. Griffin, San Bolkan, Jennifer L. Holmgren, Frank Tutzauer. Central journals and authors in communication using a publication network |
105 | -- | 117 | Grant Lewison, Philip Roe, Richard Webber, Richard Sullivan. Lung cancer researchers, 2008-2013: their sex and ethnicity |
119 | -- | 141 | Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Francesco Rosati. Gender bias in academic recruitment |
143 | -- | 162 | Peter Van den Besselaar, Ulf Sandström. Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study |
163 | -- | 186 | Marjan Cugmas, Anuska Ferligoj, Luka Kronegger. The stability of co-authorship structures |
187 | -- | 211 | Jurriën Bakker, Dennis Verhoeven, Lin Zhang, Bart Van Looy. Patent citation indicators: One size fits all? |
213 | -- | 228 | Philippe Mongeon, Adèle Paul-Hus. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis |
229 | -- | 251 | Laura Vana, Ronald Hochreiter, Kurt Hornik. Computing a journal meta-ranking using paired comparisons and adaptive lasso estimators |
253 | -- | 261 | Mario De Marchi, Edoardo Lorenzetti. Measuring the impact of scholarly journals in the humanities field |
263 | -- | 280 | Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Pascal Bador, Thierry Lafouge, Hélène Prost. Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: a bibliometric analysis |
281 | -- | 298 | William A. Reiners, Derek S. Reiners, Jeffrey A. Lockwood. Differentiation of U.S. ecologists into professional guilds based on professional traits |
299 | -- | 317 | Rajesh Kumar Bhardwaj. Scientometric analysis and dimensions on international business literature |
319 | -- | 345 | Krzysztof Klincewicz. The emergent dynamics of a technological research topic: the case of graphene |
347 | -- | 368 | Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Agata Fronczak, Piotr Fronczak. Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf's law |
369 | -- | 381 | Lin Zhang 0004, Wolfgang Glänzel, Fred Y. Ye. The Dynamic evolution of core documents: an experimental study based on h-related literature (2005-2013) |
383 | -- | 403 | Masatsura Igami, Ayaka Saka. Decreasing diversity in Japanese science, evidence from in-depth analyses of science maps |
405 | -- | 434 | Dragan Babic, Djuro Kutlaca, Lazar Zivkovic, Dijana Strbac, Dusica Semencenko. Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe |
435 | -- | 452 | Lili Wang. The structure and comparative advantages of China's scientific research: quantitative and qualitative perspectives |
453 | -- | 456 | David Hsiehchen, Magdalena Espinoza. Detecting editorial bias in medical publishing |
457 | -- | 459 | Ivan Jaric. High time for a common plagiarism detection system |
461 | -- | 468 | B. Pritychenko. Fractional authorship in nuclear physics |
469 | -- | 474 | Fabrício Benevenuto, Alberto H. F. Laender, Bruno Leite Alves. The H-index paradox: your coauthors have a higher H-index than you do |