Journal: Scientometrics

Volume 106, Issue 3

873 -- 899Hamid Bouabid, Adèle Paul-Hus, Vincent Larivière. Scientific collaboration and high-technology exchanges among BRICS and G-7 countries
901 -- 916Christopher Zou, Jordan B. Peterson. Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index
917 -- 943João Ricardo Faria, Franklin G. Mixon Jr., Kamal P. Upadhyaya. Human capital, collegiality, and stardom in economics: empirical analysis
945 -- 966George Masterton, Erik J. Olsson, Staffan Angere. Linking as voting: how the Condorcet jury theorem in political science is relevant to webometrics
967 -- 986Jose A. García, Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez, J. Fdez-Valdivia. Why the referees' reports I receive as an editor are so much better than the reports I receive as an author?
987 -- 1005Christina H. Drew, Kristianna G. Pettibone, Fallis Owen Finch III, Douglas Giles, Paul Jordan. Automated Research Impact Assessment: a new bibliometrics approach
1007 -- 1029José Willer do Prado, Valderí de Castro Alcântara, Francisval de Melo Carvalho, Kelly Carvalho Vieira, Luiz Kennedy Cruz Machado, Dany Flávio Tonelli. Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: a bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968-2014)
1031 -- 1035K. Brad Wray. No new evidence for a citation benefit for Author-Pay Open Access Publications in the social sciences and humanities
1037 -- 1055Yuandi Wang, Ruifeng Hu, Weiping Li, Xiongfeng Pan. Does teaching benefit from university-industry collaboration? Investigating the role of academic commercialization and engagement
1057 -- 1071Seokbeom Kwon, Alan Porter, Jan L. Youtie. Navigating the innovation trajectories of technology by combining specialization score analyses for publications and patents: graphene and nano-enabled drug delivery
1073 -- 1092A. Fernández, Esther Ferrándiz, M. Dolores León. Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: The closer, the better?
1093 -- 1116Ashkan Ebadi, Andrea Schiffauerova. How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors
1117 -- 1133Yu-wei Chang. Influence of the principle of least effort across disciplines
1135 -- 1150Ashraf Uddin, Jaideep Bhoosreddy, Marisha Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Singh 0001. A Sciento-text framework to characterize research strength of institutions at fine-grained thematic area level
1151 -- 1166Olesya Mryglod, Yurij Holovatch, Ralph Kenna, Bertrand Berche. Quantifying the evolution of a scientific topic: reaction of the academic community to the Chornobyl disaster
1167 -- 1191José-Antonio Ontalba-Ruipérez, Enrique Orduña-Malea, Adolfo Alonso Arroyo. Identifying institutional relationships in a geographically distributed public health system using interlinking and co-authorship methods
1193 -- 1215Teemu Makkonen, Timo Mitze. Scientific collaboration between 'old' and 'new' member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference?
1217 -- 1238Günter Krampen. Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science?
1239 -- 1264Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Grisel Zacca-González, Benjamín Vargas-Quesada, Félix de Moya Anegón. Benchmarking scientific performance by decomposing leadership of Cuban and Latin American institutions in Public Health
1265 -- 1268Mario De Marchi. A taxonomy of S&T indicators
1269 -- 1272Weishu Liu. Comments on "a comparative analysis of scientific publications in management journals by authors from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau: 2003-2012"
1273 -- 1276Weishu Liu, Guangyuan Hu, Mengdi Gu. The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals
1277 -- 1280Tom Van der Stocken, Jean Hugé, Evelien Deboelpaep, Maarten P. M. Vanhove, Luc Janssens de Bisthoven, Nico Koedam. Academic capacity building: holding up a mirror
1281 -- 1282Houcemeddine Turki. Usefulness of the single publication h-index

Volume 106, Issue 2

475 -- 508Ming-Yueh Tsay, Tung-mei Shen, Ming-hsin Liang. A comparison of citation distributions of journals and books on the topic "information society"
509 -- 524Ho Fai Chan, Ali Sina Önder, Benno Torgler. The first cut is the deepest: repeated interactions of coauthorship and academic productivity in Nobel laureate teams
525 -- 537Raymundo das Neves Machado, Benjamín Vargas-Quesada, Jacqueline Leta. Intellectual structure in stem cell research: exploring Brazilian scientific articles from 2001 to 2010
539 -- 561Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, Javier Ruiz-Castillo. A comparison of two ways of evaluating research units working in different scientific fields
563 -- 581Karmen Stopar, Damjana Drobne, Klemen Eler, Tomaz Bartol. Citation analysis and mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology: identifying the scope and interdisciplinarity of research
583 -- 601Haiyun Xu, Ting Guo, Zenghui Yue, Lijie Ru, Shu-Fang. Interdisciplinary topics of information science: a study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index series
603 -- 628Qiang Zhi, Tianguang Meng. Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China
629 -- 644Naomi Fukuzawa, Takanori Ida. Science linkages between scientific articles and patents for leading scientists in the life and medical sciences field: the case of Japan
645 -- 655Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti. Normalizing the g-index
657 -- 694Eleni Fragkiadaki, Georgios Evangelidis. Three novel indirect indicators for the assessment of papers and authors based on generations of citations
695 -- 715Michail Kovanis, Raphaël Porcher, Philippe Ravaud, Ludovic Trinquart. Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data
717 -- 750M. Ferrara, F. Lamperti, Roberto Mavilia. Looking for best performers: a pilot study towards the evaluation of science parks
751 -- 768Fenglian Liu, Aiwen Lin, Huanhuan Wang, Yuling Peng, Song Hong. Global research trends of geographical information system from 1961 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis
769 -- 785Glenn D. Walters. Adding authorship order to the quantity and quality dimensions of scholarly productivity: evidence from group- and individual-level analyses
787 -- 804Anne-Wil Harzing, Satu Alakangas. Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison
805 -- 816Jianlin Zhou, An Zeng, Ying Fan, Zengru Di. Ranking scientific publications with similarity-preferential mechanism
817 -- 818James Hartley. Is it true that papers written by joint-authors are cited more than papers written by single ones? What else matters?
819 -- 0. Towards standardisation, harmonisation and integration of data from heterogeneous sources for funding and evaluation purposes
821 -- 823Wolfgang Glänzel, Hans Willems. Preface - Towards standardisation, harmonisation and integration of data from heterogeneous sources for funding and evaluation purposes
825 -- 835Wolfgang Glänzel, Raphael Beck, Katrin Milzow, Stig Slipersæter, Gábor Tóth, Michal Kolodziejski, Pei-Shan Chi. Data collection and use in research funding and performing organisations. General outlines and first results of a project launched by Science Europe
837 -- 847Sophie Biesenbender, Stefan Hornbostel. The Research Core Dataset for the German science system: challenges, processes and principles of a contested standardization project
849 -- 855Gunnar Sivertsen. Data integration in Scandinavia
857 -- 871Cinzia Daraio, Maurizio Lenzerini, Claudio Leporelli, Henk F. Moed, Paolo Naggar, Andrea Bonaccorsi, Alessandro Bartolucci. Data integration for research and innovation policy: an Ontology-Based Data Management approach

Volume 106, Issue 1

1 -- 16Thed N. van Leeuwen, Erik Van Wijk, Paul F. Wouters. Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university
17 -- 40Yutao Sun, Seamus Grimes. The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis
41 -- 50Xiaoxi Ling, Yu Liu, Zhen Huang, Parantu K. Shah, Cheng Li. A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literatures
51 -- 65Henk F. Moed. Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: the case of two SNIP versions
67 -- 90Finn Valentin, Maria Theresa Norn, Lars Alkaersig. Orientations and outcome of interdisciplinary research: the case of research behaviour in translational medical science
91 -- 104Darrin J. Griffin, San Bolkan, Jennifer L. Holmgren, Frank Tutzauer. Central journals and authors in communication using a publication network
105 -- 117Grant Lewison, Philip Roe, Richard Webber, Richard Sullivan. Lung cancer researchers, 2008-2013: their sex and ethnicity
119 -- 141Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Francesco Rosati. Gender bias in academic recruitment
143 -- 162Peter Van den Besselaar, Ulf Sandström. Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study
163 -- 186Marjan Cugmas, Anuska Ferligoj, Luka Kronegger. The stability of co-authorship structures
187 -- 211Jurriën Bakker, Dennis Verhoeven, Lin Zhang, Bart Van Looy. Patent citation indicators: One size fits all?
213 -- 228Philippe Mongeon, Adèle Paul-Hus. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
229 -- 251Laura Vana, Ronald Hochreiter, Kurt Hornik. Computing a journal meta-ranking using paired comparisons and adaptive lasso estimators
253 -- 261Mario De Marchi, Edoardo Lorenzetti. Measuring the impact of scholarly journals in the humanities field
263 -- 280Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Pascal Bador, Thierry Lafouge, Hélène Prost. Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: a bibliometric analysis
281 -- 298William A. Reiners, Derek S. Reiners, Jeffrey A. Lockwood. Differentiation of U.S. ecologists into professional guilds based on professional traits
299 -- 317Rajesh Kumar Bhardwaj. Scientometric analysis and dimensions on international business literature
319 -- 345Krzysztof Klincewicz. The emergent dynamics of a technological research topic: the case of graphene
347 -- 368Marcel Ausloos, Olgica Nedic, Agata Fronczak, Piotr Fronczak. Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf's law
369 -- 381Lin Zhang 0004, Wolfgang Glänzel, Fred Y. Ye. The Dynamic evolution of core documents: an experimental study based on h-related literature (2005-2013)
383 -- 403Masatsura Igami, Ayaka Saka. Decreasing diversity in Japanese science, evidence from in-depth analyses of science maps
405 -- 434Dragan Babic, Djuro Kutlaca, Lazar Zivkovic, Dijana Strbac, Dusica Semencenko. Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe
435 -- 452Lili Wang. The structure and comparative advantages of China's scientific research: quantitative and qualitative perspectives
453 -- 456David Hsiehchen, Magdalena Espinoza. Detecting editorial bias in medical publishing
457 -- 459Ivan Jaric. High time for a common plagiarism detection system
461 -- 468B. Pritychenko. Fractional authorship in nuclear physics
469 -- 474Fabrício Benevenuto, Alberto H. F. Laender, Bruno Leite Alves. The H-index paradox: your coauthors have a higher H-index than you do