Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense?

Tamara Denning, Michael Kelly, David Lindquist, Roshni Malani, William G. Griswold, Beth Simon. Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense?. In Ingrid Russell, Susan M. Haller, J. D. Dougherty, Susan H. Rodger, editors, Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2007, Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 7-11, 2007. pages 266-270, ACM, 2007. [doi]

@inproceedings{DenningKLMGS07,
  title = {Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense?},
  author = {Tamara Denning and Michael Kelly and David Lindquist and Roshni Malani and William G. Griswold and Beth Simon},
  year = {2007},
  doi = {10.1145/1227310.1227406},
  url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1227310.1227406},
  tags = {source-to-source, reviewing, peer-to-peer},
  researchr = {https://researchr.org/publication/DenningKLMGS07},
  cites = {0},
  citedby = {0},
  pages = {266-270},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2007, Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 7-11, 2007},
  editor = {Ingrid Russell and Susan M. Haller and J. D. Dougherty and Susan H. Rodger},
  publisher = {ACM},
  isbn = {1-59593-361-1},
}