Abstract is missing.
- Zones of conceptualisation in scientific papers: a window to negative and speculative statementsMaria Liakata. 1-4 [doi]
- Creating and evaluating a consensus for negated and speculative words in a Swedish clinical corpusHercules Dalianis, Maria Skeppstedt. 5-13 [doi]
- Towards a better understanding of uncertainties and speculations in Swedish clinical text - Analysis of an initial annotation trialSumithra Velupillai. 14-22 [doi]
- Does negation really matter?Ira Goldstein, Özlem Uzuner. 23-27 [doi]
- Speculation and negation annotation in natural language texts: what the case of BioScope might (not) revealVeronika Vincze. 28-31 [doi]
- Automatic annotation of speculation in biomedical texts: new perspectives and large-scale evaluationJulien Desclés, Olfa Makkaoui, Taouise Hacène. 32-40 [doi]
- Levels of certainty in knowledge-intensive corpora: an initial annotation studyAron Henriksson, Sumithra Velupillai. 41-45 [doi]
- Importance of negations and experimental qualifiers in biomedical literatureMartin Krallinger. 46-49 [doi]
- Negation and modality in distributional semanticsEd Hovy. 50 [doi]
- What's great and what's not: learning to classify the scope of negation for improved sentiment analysisIsaac G. Councill, Ryan T. McDonald, Leonid Velikovich. 51-59 [doi]
- A survey on the role of negation in sentiment analysisMichael Wiegand, Alexandra Balahur, Benjamin Roth, Dietrich Klakow, Andrés Montoyo. 60-68 [doi]
- Evaluating a meta-knowledge annotation scheme for bio-eventsRaheel Nawaz, Paul Thompson, Sophia Ananiadou. 69-77 [doi]
- Using SVMs with the Command Relation features to identify negated events in biomedical literatureFarzaneh Sarafraz, Goran Nenadic. 78-85 [doi]
- Contradiction-focused qualitative evaluation of textual entailmentBernardo Magnini, Elena Cabrio. 86-94 [doi]