Abstract is missing.
- Synthesis of Argumentation Graphs by Matrix FactorizationAndrea Pazienza, Stefano Ferilli, Floriana Esposito. 1-6 [doi]
- A ConArg-based Library for Abstract ArgumentationStefano Bistarelli, Fabio Rossi, Francesco Santini. 7-21 [doi]
- Polarization and Bipolar Probabilistic Argumentation FrameworksCarlo Proietti. 22-27 [doi]
- Computing Stable and Preferred Extensions of Dynamic Bipolar Argumentation FrameworksGianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi. 28-42 [doi]
- Credulous Acceptability in Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation: Complexity ResultsBettina Fazzinga, Sergio Flesca, Filippo Furfaro. 43-57 [doi]
- Assumption-Based Approaches to Reasoning with PrioritiesJesse Heyninck, Pere Pardo, Christian Straßer. 58-72 [doi]
- Dealing with Unknowability in Formal ArgumentationPietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin, Beishui Liao. 73-78 [doi]
- Towards Computational Dialogue Types for BIM Collaborative Design: An Initial StudyAlice Toniolo, Marianthi Leon. 79-84 [doi]
- Dialog-Based Online Argumentation: Findings from a Field ExperimentTobias Krauthoff, Christian Meter, Martin Mauve. 85-99 [doi]
- Reusable Statements in Dialog-Based Argumentation SystemsAlexander Schneider, Christian Meter. 100-104 [doi]
- Generating Defeasible Knowledge Bases from Real-World Argumentations using D-BASDaniel Neugebauer. 105-110 [doi]
- Constructing and Evaluating Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks for Online Debating SystemsAndrea Pazienza, Stefano Ferilli, Floriana Esposito. 111-125 [doi]
- Representing and Inferring Mental Workload via Defeasible Reasoning: A Comparison with the NASA Task Load Index and the Workload ProfileLucas Rizzo, Luca Longo. 126-140 [doi]