Abstract is missing.
- Towards Representing and Querying Arguments on the Semantic WebIyad Rahwan, P. V. Sakeer. 3-14 [doi]
- Building Agents that Plan and Argue in a Social ContextDionysis Kalofonos, Nishan C. Karunatillake, Nicholas R. Jennings, Timothy J. Norman, Chris Reed, Simon Wells. 15-26 [doi]
- Argue tuProlog: A Lightweight Argumentation Engine for Agent ApplicationsDaniel Bryant, Paul J. Krause, Gerard Vreeswijk. 27-32 [doi]
- An Application of Formal Argumentation: Fusing Bayes Nets in MASSøren Holbech Nielsen, Simon Parsons. 33-44 [doi]
- Value-Based Argumentation for Democratic Decision SupportKatie Atkinson. 47-58 [doi]
- Argument Based Machine Learning in a Medical DomainJure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Jerneja Videcnik, Ivan Bratko. 59-70 [doi]
- CBR and Argument Schemes for Collaborative Decision MakingPancho Tolchinsky, Sanjay Modgil, Ulises Cortés, Miquel Sànchez-Marrè. 71-82 [doi]
- Complexity Properties of Restricted Abstract Argument SystemsPaul E. Dunne. 85-96 [doi]
- Computing Preferred Extensions for Argumentation Systems with Sets of Attacking ArgumentsSøren Holbech Nielsen, Simon Parsons. 97-108 [doi]
- An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systemsGerard Vreeswijk. 109-120 [doi]
- Semi-Stable SemanticsMartin Caminada. 121-130 [doi]
- Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean FormulasUwe Egly, Stefan Woltran. 133-144 [doi]
- A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentationPhan Minh Dung, Paolo Mancarella, Francesca Toni. 145-156 [doi]
- Evaluation and comparison criteria for extension-based argumentation semanticsPietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin. 157-168 [doi]
- Translating Wigmore DiagramsGlenn Rowe, Chris Reed. 171-182 [doi]
- First Steps Towards the Automatic Construction of Argument-Diagrams from Real DiscussionsDaan Verbree, Rutger Rienks, Dirk Heylen. 183-194 [doi]
- The Carneades Argumentation Framework - Using Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical QuestionsThomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton. 195-207 [doi]
- Pierson vs. Post Revisited - A Reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation FrameworkThomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton. 208-219 [doi]
- Argumentation and Persuasion in the Cognitive Coherence TheoryPhilippe Pasquier, Iyad Rahwan, Frank Dignum, Liz Sonenberg. 223-234 [doi]
- Knowing When To Bargain - The roles of negotiation and persuasion in dialogueSimon Wells, Chris Reed. 235-246 [doi]
- Justifying Actions by Accruing ArgumentsTrevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken. 247-258 [doi]
- Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systemsClaudette Cayrol, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. 261-272 [doi]
- On Acceptability in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with an Extended Defeat RelationDiego C. Martínez, Alejandro Javier García, Guillermo Ricardo Simari. 273-278 [doi]
- Automating Argumentation for Deliberation in Cases of Conflict of InterestAlison Chorley, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Peter McBurney. 279-290 [doi]
- The Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation and its Applications to Web Technology - Extended AbstractHajime Sawamura, Toshiko Wakaki, Katsumi Nitta. 291-296 [doi]
- Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation FrameworksSanjay Modgil. 297-308 [doi]
- Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoningHenry Prakken. 311-322 [doi]
- Multi-agent agreements about actions through argumentationPaolo Torroni. 323-328 [doi]
- Suspicion of Hidden Agenda in Persuasive ArgumentPaul E. Dunne. 329-340 [doi]