Abstract is missing.
- Well, to Be Honest, I Wouldnt Start from Here at AllPaul E. Dunne. 3-14 [doi]
- Detect - Debunk - Communicate: Combating Misinformation with More Realistic NLPIryna Gurevych. 15 [doi]
- Argumentation: From Theory to Practice & BackAntonis C. Kakas. 16-17 [doi]
- Generating Contrastive Snippets for Argument SearchMilad Alshomary, Jonas Rieskamp, Henning Wachsmuth. 21-31 [doi]
- Explainable Logic-Based ArgumentationOfer Arieli, Annemarie Borg, Matthis Hesse, Christian Straßer. 32-43 [doi]
- Admissibility in Strength-Based Argumentation: Complexity and AlgorithmsYohann Bacquey, Jean-Guy Mailly, Pavlos Moraitis, Julien Rossit. 44-55 [doi]
- A Generalized Notion of Consistency with Applications to Formal ArgumentationPietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin. 56-67 [doi]
- Argument Schemes for Factor AscriptionTrevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson. 68-79 [doi]
- Serialisable Semantics for Abstract ArgumentationLars Bengel, Matthias Thimm. 80-91 [doi]
- Abstract Argumentation with Conditional PreferencesMichael Bernreiter, Wolfgang Dvorák, Stefan Woltran. 92-103 [doi]
- A Ranking Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Based on SerialisabilityLydia Blümel, Matthias Thimm. 104-115 [doi]
- NEXAS: A Visual Tool for Navigating and Exploring Argumentation Solution SpacesMei Yang. 116-127 [doi]
- Non-Admissibility in Abstract ArgumentationWolfgang Dvorák, Tjitze Rienstra, Leendert van der Torre, Stefan Woltran. 128-139 [doi]
- Treewidth for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective AttacksWolfgang Dvorák, Matthias König 0002, Stefan Woltran. 140-151 [doi]
- Rule-PSAT: Relaxing Rule Constraints in Probabilistic Assumption-Based ArgumentationXiuyi Fan. 152-163 [doi]
- Composite Argumentation Systems with ML ComponentsNguyen Duy Hung, Nam Van Huynh, Thanaruk Theeramunkong, Tho-Quy Nhu. 164-175 [doi]
- Automated Reasoning with Epistemic Graphs Using SAT SolversAnthony Hunter. 176-187 [doi]
- Explaining Change in Quantitative Bipolar ArgumentationTimotheus Kampik, Kristijonas Cyras. 188-199 [doi]
- How Complex Is the Strong Admissibility Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks?Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Wolfgang Dvorák, Rineke Verbrugge, Bart Verheij. 200-211 [doi]
- Just a Matter of PerspectiveMatthias König 0002, Anna Rapberger, Markus Ulbricht 0001. 212-223 [doi]
- On the Impact of Data Selection when Applying Machine Learning in Abstract ArgumentationIsabelle Kuhlmann, Thorsten Wujek, Matthias Thimm. 224-235 [doi]
- Algorithms for Reasoning in a Default Logic Instantiation of Assumption-Based ArgumentationTuomo Lehtonen, Johannes Peter Wallner, Matti Järvisalo. 236-247 [doi]
- Value-Based Practical Reasoning: Modal Logic + ArgumentationJieting Luo, Beishui Liao, Dov M. Gabbay. 248-259 [doi]
- On the Complexity of Determining Defeat Relations Consistent with Abstract Argumentation SemanticsJack Mumford, Isabel Sassoon, Elizabeth Black, Simon Parsons. 260-271 [doi]
- Stability and Relevance in Incomplete Argumentation FrameworksDaphne Odekerken, Annemarie Borg, Floris Bex. 272-283 [doi]
- Arguing About the Existence of ConflictsGiuseppe Pisano, Roberta Calegari, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor. 284-295 [doi]
- Formalising an Aspect of Argument Strength: Degrees of AttackabilityHenry Prakken. 296-307 [doi]
- Ordinal Conditional Functions for Abstract ArgumentationKenneth Skiba, Matthias Thimm. 308-319 [doi]
- Strongly Accepting Subframeworks: Connecting Abstract and Structured ArgumentationMarkus Ulbricht 0001, Johannes Peter Wallner. 320-331 [doi]
- Reasoning With and About Norms in Logical ArgumentationKees van Berkel 0002, Christian Straßer. 332-343 [doi]
- An Argumentative Explanation of Machine Learning OutcomesStefano Bistarelli, Alessio Mancinelli, Francesco Santini 0001, Carlo Taticchi. 347-348 [doi]
- PyArg for Solving and Explaining Argumentation in Python: DemonstrationAnnemarie Borg, Daphne Odekerken. 349-350 [doi]
- Providing Explanations via the EQR Argument SchemeFederico Castagna, Simon Parsons, Isabel Sassoon, Elizabeth I. Sklar. 351-352 [doi]
- EGNN: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Architecture for Enforcement HeuristicsDennis Craandijk, Floris Bex. 353-354 [doi]
- ADF-BDD: An ADF Solver Based on Binary Decision DiagramsStefan Ellmauthaler, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Dominik Rusovac, Johannes Peter Wallner. 355-356 [doi]
- Annotating Very Large ArgumentsKamila Gorska, Wassiliki Siskou, Chris Reed. 357-358 [doi]
- CPrAA - A Checker for Probabilistic Abstract ArgumentationNikolai Käfer. 359-360 [doi]
- COGNICA: Cognitive ArgumentationAdamos Koumi, Antonis C. Kakas, Emmanuelle Dietz. 361-362 [doi]
- probo2: A Benchmark Framework for Argumentation SolversJonas Klein, Matthias Thimm. 363-364 [doi]
- Polemicist: A Dialogical Interface for Exploring Complex DebatesJohn Lawrence, Jacky Visser, Chris Reed. 365-366 [doi]
- User-Centric Argument Mining with ArgueMapper and ArguebufMirko Lenz, Ralph Bergmann. 367-368 [doi]
- Attractor - A Java Library for Gradual Bipolar ArgumentationNico Potyka. 369-370 [doi]
- Gorgias Cloud: On-line Explainable ArgumentationNikolaos I. Spanoudakis, Georgios Gligoris, Antonis C. Kakas, Adamos Koumi. 371-372 [doi]
- Interpretable Machine Learning with Gradual Argumentation FrameworksJonathan Spieler, Nico Potyka, Steffen Staab. 373-374 [doi]
- The Skeptic Web Service: Utilising Argument Technologies for Reason-CheckingJacky Visser, John Lawrence. 375-376 [doi]
- ACH-Nav: Argument Navigation Using Techniques for Intelligence AnalysisDimitra Zografistou, Jacky Visser, John Lawrence, Chris Reed. 377-378 [doi]