Abstract is missing.
- A generative model of narrative casesKarl Branting. 1-8 [doi]
- Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal casesStefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley. 9-17 [doi]
- The evaluation of legal knowledge based systemsAndrew Stranieri, John Zeleznikow. 18-24 [doi]
- I yield one minute...: an analysis of the final speeches from the House impeachment hearingsEdwina L. Rissland. 25-35 [doi]
- Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument modelsTrevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 36-42 [doi]
- Automated argument assistance for lawyersBart Verheij. 43-52 [doi]
- Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworksHadassa Jakobovits, Dirk Vermeir. 53-62 [doi]
- Precedent, deontic logic, and inheritanceJohn F. Horty. 63-72 [doi]
- Checking regulation consistency by using SOL-resolutionLaurence Cholvy. 73-79 [doi]
- Application of enriched deontic legal relations: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 7(a), pleadingsLayman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon. 80-89 [doi]
- Time and norms: a formalisation in the event-calculusRafaél Hernández Marín, Giovanni Sartor. 90-99 [doi]
- AI techniques for modelling legal negotiationEmilia Bellucci, John Zeleznikow. 108-116 [doi]
- The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based systemJohn Yearwood, Andrew Stranieri. 117-125 [doi]
- Mutual benefits for AI & law and knowledge managementAnja Oskamp, Maaike Tragter, Arno R. Lodder. 126-127 [doi]
- With a wysh and a prayer: an experiment in cooperative development of legal knowledgebasesGraham Greenleaf, Philip Chung, Daniel Austin, Russell Allen, Andrew Mowbray. 130-131 [doi]
- A legal negotiation support systemKatsumi Nitta, Masato Shibasaki, Akira Yamazaki, Yoshiaki Yasumura. 132-133 [doi]
- Bankruptcy case law: a hybrid IR-CBR approachMohamed T. Elhadi, Tibor Vamos. 134-135 [doi]
- Verification and normalization of sentencesMarco Costa, José Neves, Orlando Sousa, Simas Santos. 136-137 [doi]
- Anaphora resolution in the extraction of treatment history language from court opinions by partial parsingKhalid Al-Kofahi, Brian Grom, Peter Jackson. 138-146 [doi]
- JurisConsulto: retrieval in jurisprudencial text bases using juridical terminologyTânia C. D Agostini Bueno, Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim, Eduardo da Silva Mattos, Hugo Cesar Hoeschl, Ricardo Miranda Barcia. 147-155 [doi]
- A learning technique for legal document analysisErich Schweighofer, Dieter Merkl. 156-163 [doi]
- Intelligent jurisprudence research: a new conceptRosina Weber. 164-172 [doi]
- JUSTICE: a judicial search tool using intelligent concept extractionJames Osborn, Leon Sterling. 173-181 [doi]
- Generating exception structures for legal information servingRadboud Winkels, D. J. B. Bosscher, A. W. F. Boer, J. A. Breuker. 182-189 [doi]
- A collaborative legal information retrieval system using dynamic logic programmingPaulo Quaresma, Irene Pimenta Rodrigues. 190-191 [doi]
- From collective to individual commitmentsLambèr M. M. Royakkers, Frank Dignum. 192-193 [doi]
- Knowledge criteria for the evaluation of legal beliefsLaurens Mommers, H. Jaap van den Herik. 194-195 [doi]
- A demonstration of a legal reasoning system based on teleological analogiesTokuyasu Kakuta, Makoto Haraguchi. 196-205 [doi]
- Developing computational models of discretion to build legal knowledge based systemsYaakov HaCohen-Kerner, Uri J. Schild, John Zeleznikow. 206-213 [doi]
- Integrating discourse and domain knowledge for document draftingKarl Branting, Charles B. Callaway, Bradford W. Mott, James C. Lester. 214-220 [doi]