Table of Contents

• AI-supported decision-making under the general data protection regulationMaja Brkan. 3-8 [doi]
• A low-cost, high-coverage legal named entity recognizer, classifier and linkerCristian Cardellino, Milagro Teruel, Laura Alonso Alemany, Serena Villata. 9-18 [doi]
• Extracting contract elementsIlias Chalkidis, Ion Androutsopoulos, Achilleas Michos. 19-28 [doi]
• Scenario analytics: analyzing jury verdicts to evaluate legal case outcomesJack G. Conrad, Khalid Al-Kofahi. 29-37 [doi]
• Changes to temporary normsMatteo Cristani, Francesco Olivieri, Antonino Rotolo. 39-48 [doi]
• Combining fuzzy logic and formal argumentation for legal interpretationCélia da Costa Pereira, Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi, Beishui Liao, Alessandra Malerba, Antonino Rotolo, Leendert W. N. van der Torre. 49-58 [doi]
• Performance improvement on legal model checkingCarlos Faciano, Sergio Mera, Fernando Schapachnik, Ana Haydée Di Iorio, Bibiana Luz Clara, Verónica Uriarte, María Fernanda Giaccaglia, María Belén Ruffa, Cristian Marcos. 59-68 [doi]
• The opportunity prior: a simple and practical solution to the prior probability problem for legal casesNorman Fenton, David A. Lagnado, Christian Dahlman, Martin Neil. 69-76 [doi]
• CLIEL: context-based information extraction from commercial law documentsMatias Garcia-Constantino, Katie Atkinson, Danushka Bollegala, Karl Chapman, Frans Coenen, Claire Roberts, Katy Robson. 79-87 [doi]
• Predicting trade secret case outcomes using argument schemes and learned quantitative value effect tradeoffsMatthias Grabmair. 89-98 [doi]
• Interpreting contracts using english common law rules as stated by Lord HoffmannJohn Henderson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 99-108 [doi]
• Reasoning with dimensions and magnitudesJohn F. Horty. 109-118 [doi]
• Towards a legal definition of machine intelligence: the argument for artificial personhood in the age of deep learningArgyro Karanasiou, Dimitris Pinotsis. 119-128 [doi]
• A logical architecture for dynamic legal interpretationJuliano S. A. Maranhão. 129-138 [doi]
• Compliance patterns: harnessing value modeling and legal interpretation to manage regulatory conversationsRobert Muthuri, Guido Boella, Joris Hulstijn, Sara Capecchi, Llio Humphreys. 139-148 [doi]
• A unifying similarity measure for automated identification of national implementations of european union directivesRohan Nanda, Luigi Di Caro, Guido Boella, Hristo Konstantinov, Tenyo Tyankov, Daniel Traykov, Hristo Hristov, Francesco Costamagna, Llio Humphreys, Livio Robaldo, Michele Romano. 149-158 [doi]
• Classifying sentential modality in legal language: a use case in financial regulations, acts and directivesJames O'Neill, Paul Buitelaar, Cécile Robin, Leona O'Brien. 159-168 [doi]
• The pragmatic oddity in norm-based deontic logicsXavier Parent, Leendert W. N. van der Torre. 169-178 [doi]
• Methods for retrieving alternative contract language using a prototypeSilviu Pitis. 179-187 [doi]
• Experimenting word embeddings in assisting legal reviewNgoc Phuoc An Vo, Caroline Privault, Fabien Guillot. 189-198 [doi]
• Formalizing arguments, rules and casesBart Verheij. 199-208 [doi]
• A sequence approach to case outcome detectionTom Vacek, Frank Schilder. 209-215 [doi]
• Semantic types for computational legal reasoning: propositional connectives and sentence roles in the veterans' claims datasetVern R. Walker, Ji Hae Han, Xiang Ni, Kaneyasu Yoseda. 217-226 [doi]
• Towards an automated production of legal texts using recurrent neural networksWolfgang Alschner, Dmitriy Skougarevskiy. 229-232 [doi]
• Early predictability of asylum court decisionsMatthew Dunn, Levent Sagun, Hale Sirin, Daniel Chen. 233-236 [doi]
• Can machine learning help predict the outcome of asylum adjudications?Daniel L. Chen, Jess Eagel. 237-240 [doi]
• On making autonomous vehicles respect traffic law: a case study for dutch lawHenry Prakken. 241-244 [doi]
• A knowledge organization system for e-participation in law-makingP. Schmitz, Enrico Francesconi, Simon-Pierre Landercy, Brahim Batouche, V. Touly. 245-248 [doi]
• Supertagging for domain adaptation: an approach with law textsKyoko Sugisaki. 249-252 [doi]
• The genealogy of ideology: predicting agreement and persuasive memes in the U.S. courts of appealsShivam Verma, Adithya Parthasarathy, Daniel L. Chen. 253-256 [doi]
• Predicting litigation likelihood and time to litigation for patentsP. Wongchaisuwat, Diego Klabjan, J. O. McGinnis. 257-260 [doi]
• Effectiveness results for popular e-discovery algorithmsEugene Yang, David A. Grossman, Ophir Frieder, Roman Yurchak. 261-264 [doi]
• Angelic environment: demonstrationLatifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Sam Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 267-268 [doi]
• A scalable approach to legal question answeringZachary Bennett, Tony Russell-Rose, Kate Farmer. 269-270 [doi]
• LexrideLaw: an argument based legal search engineMatthew Gifford. 271-272 [doi]
• Legal content fusion for legal information retrievalSeongwan Heo, Kihyun Hong, Young-Yik Rhim. 277-281 [doi]
• Two-step cascaded textual entailment for legal bar exam question answeringMi-Young Kim, Randy Goebel. 283-290 [doi]