Abstract is missing.
- Human intervention in automated decision-making: Toward the construction of contestable systemsMarco Almada. 2-11 [doi]
- Reasoning with Legal Cases: Analogy or Rule Application?Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 12-21 [doi]
- Semi-Supervised Methods for Explainable Legal PredictionKarl Branting, Brandy Weiss, Bradford Brown, Craig Pfeifer, A. Chakraborty, Lisa Ferro, M. Pfaff, Alexander S. Yeh. 22-31 [doi]
- Describing the Development of Case LawJohn Henderson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 32-41 [doi]
- Explainable Bayesian Network Query Results via Natural Language Generation SystemsJeroen Keppens. 42-51 [doi]
- Substantive Legal Software Quality: A Gathering Storm?Marc Lauritsen, Quinten Steenhuis. 52-62 [doi]
- Automated reasoning in normative detachment structures with ideal conditionsTomer Libal, Matteo Pascucci. 63-72 [doi]
- Extracting the Gist of Chinese Judgments of the Supreme CourtChao-Lin Liu, Kuan-Chun Chen. 73-82 [doi]
- Why Machine Learning May Lead to Unfairness: Evidence from Risk Assessment for Juvenile Justice in CataloniaSongül Tolan, Marius Miron, Emilia Gómez, Carlos Castillo. 83-92 [doi]
- Exploiting Search Logs to Aid in Training and Automating Infrastructure for Question Answering in Professional DomainsFilippo Pompili, Jack G. Conrad, Carter Kolbeck. 93-102 [doi]
- Modelling Accrual of Arguments in ASPIC+Henry Prakken. 103-112 [doi]
- Improving Sentence Retrieval from Case Law for Statutory InterpretationJaromír Savelka, Huihui Xu, Kevin D. Ashley. 113-122 [doi]
- MagnetDroid: security-oriented analysis for bridging privacy and law for Android applicationsEmanuele Uliana, Kostas Stathis, Robert Jago. 123-132 [doi]
- Using Factors to Predict and Analyze Landlord-Tenant Decisions to Increase Access to JusticeHannes Westermann, Vern R. Walker, Kevin D. Ashley, Karim Benyekhlef. 133-142 [doi]
- Supporting Discussions About Forensic Bayesian Networks Using ArgumentationRemi Wieten, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij. 143-152 [doi]
- A Regularization Approach to Combining Keywords and Training Data in Technology-Assisted ReviewEugene Yang, David D. Lewis, Ophir Frieder. 153-162 [doi]
- Automatic Summarization of Legal Decisions using Iterative Masking of Predictive SentencesLinwu Zhong, Ziyi Zhong, Zinian Zhao, Siyuan Wang, Kevin D. Ashley, Matthias Grabmair. 163-172 [doi]
- Norms and Extended Argumentation FrameworksTrevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sanjay Modgil. 174-178 [doi]
- Crime Knowledge Extraction: an Ontology-driven Approach for Detecting Abstract Terms in Case Law DecisionsSilvana Castano, Alfio Ferrara, Mattia Falduti, Stefano Montanelli. 179-183 [doi]
- A Reliable and Accurate Multiple Choice Question Answering System for Due DiligenceRadha Chitta, Alexander K. Hudek. 184-188 [doi]
- Why blockchains need the law: Secondary rules as the missing piece of blockchain governanceMarco Crepaldi. 189-193 [doi]
- The False, the Former, and the Parish PriestRobert van Doesburg, Tom M. van Engers. 194-198 [doi]
- Argument Identification in Public Comments from eRulemakingVlad Eidelman, Brian Grom. 199-203 [doi]
- The Application of ODCM for Building Well-Founded Legal Domain Ontologies: A Case Study in the Domain of Carriage of Goods by SeaMirna El Ghosh, Habib Abdulrab. 204-208 [doi]
- AI as a Legal PersonMigle Laukyte. 209-213 [doi]
- Evaluation of Causal Arguments in Law: the Case of OverdeterminationRuta Liepina, Giovanni Sartor, Adam Wyner. 214-218 [doi]
- Value assessment and revision in legal interpretationJuliano Maranhão, Giovanni Sartor. 219-223 [doi]
- Artificial Intelligence and Law: What Do People Really Want?: Example of a French Multidisciplinary Working GroupFabrice Muhlenbach, Isabelle Sayn. 224-228 [doi]
- Modelling Dialogues for Optimal LegislationGuido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo, Régis Riveret, Serena Villata. 229-233 [doi]
- Automatic Construction of a Polish Legal Dictionary with Mappings to Extra-Legal Terms Established via Word EmbeddingsAleksander Smywinski-Pohl, Karol Lasocki, Krzysztof Wróbel, Marek Strzalta. 234-238 [doi]
- Machine learning for explaining and ranking the most influential matters of lawMax Raphael Sobroza Marques, Tommaso Bianco, Maxime Roodnejad, Thomas Baduel, Claude Berrou. 239-243 [doi]
- Automated Bundle Pagination Using Machine LearningAlessandro Torrisi, Robert Bevan, Katie Atkinson, Danushka Bollegala, Frans Coenen. 244-248 [doi]
- ADEPT: Automated Directive Extraction from Policy TextsKarl Branting, S. Petersen, D. Shin, J. Finegan, C. Balhana, Alex Lyte, Craig Pfeifer. 250-251 [doi]
- Adapting Covariate Shift for Legal AIVenkata Nagaraju Buddarapu, Arunprasath Shankar. 252-253 [doi]
- Reducing Subjectivity and Bias in an Officer's Analysis of Suspicion in Drug Interdiction StopsArthur Crivella, Wesley M. Oliver, Morgan A. Gray. 254-255 [doi]
- Westlaw Edge AI Features Demo: KeyCite Overruling Risk, Litigation Analytics, and WestSearch PlusTonya Custis, Frank Schilder, Thomas Vacek, Gayle McElvain, Héctor Martínez Alonso. 256-257 [doi]
- Legal Knowledge Representation Using a Faceted SchemeMichelle Cumyn, Günter Reiner, Sabine Mas, David Lesieur. 258-259 [doi]
- Towards Computer-aided Analysis of Readability and Comprehensibility of Patient Information in the Context of Clinical Research ProjectsIngo Glaser, Georg Bonczek, Jörg Landthaler, Florian Matthes. 260-261 [doi]
- NAI: The Normative ReasonerTomer Libal, Alexander Steen. 262-263 [doi]
- AI-Enabled Litigation Evaluation: Data-Driven Empowerment for Legal Decision MakersDennis P. Michalopoulos, Jessica Jacob, Alfredo Coviello. 264-265 [doi]
- Legal Machine-Learning Analysis: First Steps towards A.I. Assisted Legal ResearchWai Yin Mok, Jonathan R. Mok. 266-267 [doi]
- Facts2Law: using deep learning to provide a legal qualification to a set of factsIvan Mokanov, Daniel Shane, Benjamin Cerat. 268-269 [doi]
- User-Friendly Open-Source Case-Based Legal ReasoningJason Morris. 270-271 [doi]
- Neural Attention Learning for Legal Query ReformulationArunprasath Shankar, Venkata Nagaraju Buddarapu. 272-273 [doi]
- Building Legal Case Retrieval Systems with Lexical Matching and Summarization using A Pre-Trained Phrase Scoring ModelVu D. Tran, Minh Le Nguyen, Ken Satoh. 275-282 [doi]
- Statute Law Information Retrieval and EntailmentMi-Young Kim, Juliano Rabelo, Randy Goebel. 283-289 [doi]
- Combining Similarity and Transformer Methods for Case Law EntailmentJuliano Rabelo, Mi-Young Kim, Randy Goebel. 290-296 [doi]