Table of Contents

• Impact of CAD with Full Field Digital Mammography on Workflow and CostPaul M. Taylor, Henry W. W. Potts, Louise Wilkinson, Rosalind M. Given-Wilson. 1-8 [doi]
• Performance of Triple-Modality CADx on Breast Cancer Diagnostic ClassificationNeha Bhooshan, Maryellen L. Giger, Karen Drukker, Yading Yuan, Hui Li, Stephanie McCann, Gillian Newstead, Charlene A. Sennett. 9-14 [doi]
• Needle Path Planning Method for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Biopsy Based on Probabilistic TechniquesLaurence Vancamberg, Anis Sahbani, Serge Muller, Guillaume Morel. 15-22 [doi]
• X-ray Mammography - MRI Registration Using a Volume-Preserving Affine Transformation and an EM-MRF for Breast Tissue ClassificationThomy Mertzanidou, John H. Hipwell, Manuel Jorge Cardoso, Christine Tanner, Sébastien Ourselin, David J. Hawkes. 23-30 [doi]
• Interactive Multi-scale Contrast Enhancement of Previously Processed Digital MammogramsFabian Zöhrer, Markus Thorsten Harz, Anke Bödicker, Heike Seyffarth, Kathy J. Schilling, László K. Tabár, Horst K. Hahn. 31-38 [doi]
• Lesion Segmentation in Breast SonographyJoan Massich, Fabrice Meriaudeau, Elsa Pérez, Robert Marti, Arnau Oliver, Joan Martí. 39-45 [doi]
• Mammogram Compression Using Super-ResolutionJun Zheng, Olac Fuentes, Ming-Ying Leung, Elais Jackson. 46-53 [doi]
• Development of an Ensemble of Digital Breast Object ModelsJ. Michael O Connor, Mini Das, Clay Didier, Mufeed Mah d, Stephen J. Glick. 54-61 [doi]
• Analysis of Geometric Accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ReconstructionPredrag R. Bakic, Peter Ringer, Johnny Kuo, Susan Ng, Andrew D. A. Maidment. 62-69 [doi]
• Results of Comprehensive Dose Survey for MammographyPaola Baldelli, James B. McCullagh, Niall Phelan, Fidelma Flanagan. 70-77 [doi]
• Validation of a Simulated Dose Reduction Methodology Using Digital Mammography CDMAM Images and Mastectomy ImagesMary Yip, Federica Zanca, Alistair Mackenzie, Adam Workman, Kenneth C. Young, David R. Dance, Hilde Bosmans, Emma Lewis, Kevin Wells. 78-85 [doi]
• Measured Dose versus Organ Dose Performance in Digital Mammography SystemsJames B. McCullagh, Paola Baldelli, Niall Phelan. 86-91 [doi]
• Noise Reduction in Dual-Energy Contrast Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using RegularizationRazvan Iordache, Maélène Lohezic, Giovanni Palma, Sylvie Puong, Serge Muller. 92-99 [doi]
• Phantom Dose Levels Found at Annual Physics Surveys in a National Mammography Screening Program: Comparison of Doses from Analog and Digital Equipment and from Digital Equipment at Different Points in TimeKristin Pedersen, Ingrid D. Landmark, Kirsti Bredholt, Ingrid H. R. Hauge, Hilde M. Olerud. 100-105 [doi]
• Task-Based Evaluation of Image Quality of Filtered Back Projection for Breast TomosynthesisXinying Wang, James G. Mainprize, Gang Wu, Martin J. Yaffe. 106-113 [doi]
• A Comparative Study of the Inter-reader Variability of Breast Percent Density Estimation in Digital Mammography: Potential Effect of Reader s Training and Clinical ExperienceEmily F. Conant, Diane Li, Sara Gavenonis, Predrag R. Bakic, Ann-Katherine Carton, Cuiping Zhang, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Despina Kontos. 114-120 [doi]
• Concepts for Efficient and Reliable Multi-modal Breast Image ReadingHorst K. Hahn, Markus Thorsten Harz, Heike Seyffarth, Fabian Zöhrer, Tobias Böhler, Konstantinos Filippatos, Lei Wang, André Homeyer, Felix Ritter, Hendrik Laue, Matthias Günther, Thorsten Twellmann, László K. Tabár, Ulrich Bick, Kathy J. Schilling. 121-128 [doi]
• Modeling the Impact of CAD on the Outcomes of the UK Breast Screening ProgrammePaul Taylor. 129-136 [doi]
• Introducing a Novel Image Quality Measure for Digital Phase-Contrast-Image EvaluationSatoru Matsuo, Hiroshi Fujita, Junji Morishita, Tetsuro Katafuchi. 137-144 [doi]
• Modelling Structural Deformations in Mammographic Tissue Using the Dual-Tree Complex WaveletMichael Berks, Chris Taylor, Rumana Rahim, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Susan M. Astley. 145-152 [doi]
• Classification of Linear Structures in Mammograms Using Random ForestsZezhi Chen, Michael Berks, Susan M. Astley, Chris Taylor. 153-160 [doi]
• Should CAD Be Used as a Second Reader? - Exploring Two Alternative Reading Modes for CAD in Screening MammographyRichard Lederman, Isaac Leichter, Eli Ratner, Menahem Abramov, Alexandra Manevitch, Jonathan Stoeckel. 161-167 [doi]
• Automated Assessment of Area of Dense Tissue in the Breast: A Comparison with Human EstimationCamilla Jeffries-Chung, Jennifer Diffey, Michael Berks, Joanna Morrison, Rosanne Verow, Julie Morris, Mary Wilson, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Nicky B. Barr, Anthony Maxwell, Alan Hufton, Susan M. Astley. 168-174 [doi]
• Local Greylevel Appearance Histogram Based Texture SegmentationReyer Zwiggelaar. 175-182 [doi]
• Quantification of Vascular Calcifications on Digitized MammogramsEnrique Nava, Irene Barba, Francisco Sendra, Celestino Gómez-Rebollo. 183-190 [doi]
• Comparison of Tilt Correction Methods in Full Field Digital MammogramsMichiel Kallenberg, Nico Karssemeijer. 191-196 [doi]
• Optimising Beam Quality Selection in Mammographic Acquisition Using the Standard Attenuation RateChristopher E. Tromans, Jennifer Diffey, Mary Cocker, Michael Brady. 197-204 [doi]
• Investigating the Replacement of the Physical Anti-scatter Grid with Digital Image ProcessingChristopher E. Tromans, Jennifer Diffey, Michael Brady. 205-212 [doi]
• Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Breast Cancers; Challenging to Diagnose Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC)Yoshifumi Kuroki, Katsuhiro Nasu, Seiko Kuroki, Ryuzo Sekiguchi, Shigeru Nawano, Mitsuo Satake. 213-218 [doi]
• Performance Assessment of Breast Tomosynthesis Systems: Concepts for Two Types of PhantomsHilde Bosmans, Jürgen Jacobs, Eman Shaheen, Federica Zanca, Lesley Cockmartin, Kristina Bliznakova, Kim Lemmens, Sabrina Vollmar, Willi A. Kalender, Nicholas Marshall. 227-234 [doi]
• Realistic Simulation of Microcalcifications in Breast TomosynthesisEman Shaheen, Chantal Van Ongeval, Lesley Cockmartin, Federica Zanca, Nicholas Marshall, Jürgen Jacobs, Hilde Bosmans. 235-242 [doi]
• Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction Using a Grid of Blobs with Projection MatricesGang Wu, James G. Mainprize, Martin J. Yaffe. 243-250 [doi]
• A Boosting Based Approach for Automatic Micro-calcification DetectionArnau Oliver, Albert Torrent, Meritxell Tortajada, Xavier Lladó, Marta Peracaula, Lidia Tortajada, Melcior Sentís, Jordi Freixenet. 251-258 [doi]
• Automatic Breast Tissue Classification Based on BIRADS CategoriesNoelia Vállez, Gloria Bueno, Oscar Déniz, Pablo Esteve, Miguel A. Rienda, Carlos Pastor. 259-266 [doi]
• Validation of Mammographic Texture Analysis for Assessment of Breast Cancer RiskHui Li, Maryellen L. Giger, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Li Lan. 267-271 [doi]
• Towards Learning Spiculation Score of the Masses in Mammography ImagesInna Stainvas, Jonathan Stoeckel, Eli Ratner, Menachem Abramov, Richard Lederman. 272-279 [doi]
• Three Digital Mammography Display Configurations: Observer Performance in a Pilot ROC StudyLászló K. Tabár, Alfredo S. Niño, Eric Schreiber, Richard Ellis, Cynthia Goralnik, Steven Scislaw, Raja Cheruvu, Deepa Masrani, Daoxian Zhang, Steve Muller, Patrick Heffernan. 280-287 [doi]
• How Can Image Quality Affect the Detection Performance of Breast CAD (Computer Aided Detection) in FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography)? - A Comparative Study with Two Different FFDM Systems-Nachiko Uchiyama, Jonathan Stoeckel, Kyoichi Otsuka, Seiko Kuroki, Yukio Muramatsu, Noriyuki Moriyama. 288-295 [doi]
• Feature Point Detection for Non-rigid Registration of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ImagesWeiwei Zhang, Michael Brady. 296-303 [doi]
• Reader Fatigue Interpreting MammogramsElizabeth A. Krupinski. 312-318 [doi]
• Adapting Clinical Images to Appear with Different Noise and Sharpness to Model a Different DetectorAlistair Mackenzie, Adam Workman, David R. Dance, Mary Yip, Kevin Wells, Kenneth C. Young. 319-326 [doi]
• Human Observer Performance in a Single Slice or a Volume: Effect of Background CorrelationIngrid S. Reiser, Robert M. Nishikawa. 327-333 [doi]
• Influence of Geometrical Factors on Phase Contrast Fiber ImagesMargarita Chevalier, Lorena Chanes, Eduardo Guibelalde, María-Ester Brandan, Tatiana Alieva. 334-341 [doi]
• Robust Breast Composition Measurement - Volpara:::TM:::Ralph Highnam, Michael Brady, Martin J. Yaffe, Nico Karssemeijer, Jennifer Harvey. 342-349 [doi]
• Technical Evaluation of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis SystemNicholas Marshall, Jürgen Jacobs, Lesley Cockmartin, Hilde Bosmans. 350-356 [doi]
• Mammographic Interpretation Training: How Could Low Cost Display Devices Help?Yan Chen, Alastair G. Gale. 357-364 [doi]
• A Survey of Patient Doses from Digital Mammography Systems in the UK in 2007 to 2009Jennifer M. Oduko, Kenneth C. Young, Anna Burch. 365-370 [doi]
• Analysis of Mammography Quality Control Results: Evidence for a Change in Test Frequency?Koen Michielsen, Jürgen Jacobs, Nicholas Marshall, Hilde Bosmans. 371-377 [doi]
• A Comparative Study of Volumetric and Area-Based Breast Density Estimation in Digital Mammography: Results from a Screening PopulationDespina Kontos, Predrag R. Bakic, Raymond J. Acciavatti, Emily F. Conant, Andrew D. A. Maidment. 378-385 [doi]
• Volumetric Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a Screening PopulationJennifer Diffey, Joanna Morrison, Michael Berks, Joanne Greene, Julie Morris, Anthony Maxwell, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Alan Hufton, Susan M. Astley. 386-393 [doi]
• Determinants and Consequences of Change in Breast DensityMona Jeffreys, Ruth Warren, Ralph Highnam, George Davey Smith. 394-401 [doi]
• Comparison of Subregional Breast Density with Whole Breast DensitySerghei Malkov, Lin Ma, Karla Kerlikowske, Jeff Wang, Steve Cummings, John Shepherd. 402-407 [doi]
• Comparing a New Volumetric Breast Density Method (Volpara:::TM:::) to CumulusMona Jeffreys, Jennifer Harvey, Ralph Highnam. 408-413 [doi]
• Visual Assessment of Density in Digital MammogramsAnisha Sukha, Michael Berks, Julie Morris, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Mary Wilson, Nicky B. Barr, Susan M. Astley. 414-420 [doi]
• Concepts for High-Resolution CT of the BreastWilli A. Kalender. 421-427 [doi]
• Optimised Breast Tomosynthesis with a Novel CMOS Flat Panel DetectorSteve Naday, Edward F. Bullard, Spencer Gunn, James E. Brodrick, Eoin O. O Tuairisg, Alan McArthur, Hamdan Amin, Mark B. Williams, Patricia Goodale Judy, Anastasios Konstantinidis. 428-435 [doi]
• Calculation of OTF, NPS, and DQE for Oblique X-Ray Incidence on Turbid Granular PhosphorsRaymond J. Acciavatti, Andrew D. A. Maidment. 436-443 [doi]
• Scanner for Integrated X-Ray Breast Tomosynthesis and Molecular Breast Imaging TomosynthesisMark B. Williams, Patricia Goodale Judy, Zongyi Gong, Audrey E. Graham, Stan Majewski, Spencer Gunn. 444-451 [doi]
• An Anthropomorphic Software Breast Phantom for Tomosynthesis Simulation: Power Spectrum Analysis of Phantom ProjectionsPredrag R. Bakic, Beverly A. Lau, Ann-Katherine Carton, Ingrid S. Reiser, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Robert M. Nishikawa. 452-458 [doi]
• Comparison of Two Novel FFDM Systems with Different a-Se Detector Technology: Physical Characterization and Phantom Contrast Detail Evaluation in Clinical ConditionsNadia Oberhofer, Alessandro Fracchetti, Elvina Nassivera, Aldo Valentini, Ehrenfried Moroder. 459-466 [doi]
• Development of a Peripheral Thickness Estimation Method for Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in Mammography Using a 3D Finite Element Breast ModelOlivier Alonzo-Proulx, James G. Mainprize, Nathan J. Packard, John M. Boone, Adil Al-Mayah, Kristy Brock, Martin J. Yaffe. 467-473 [doi]
• Is CAD Able to Assist in the Detection of Subtle Breast Findings - Lobular Cancers, and T1a/T1b Masses in Dense Breasts?Isaac Leichter, Zahava Gallimidi, Asnat Heyman-Reiss, Nicolas Merlet, Eli Ratner, Menachem Abramov, Inna Stainvas, Richard Lederman. 474-480 [doi]
• Towards More Realistic Biomechanical Modelling of Tumours under Mammographic CompressionsCarolina Wessel, Julia A. Schnabel, Michael Brady. 481-489 [doi]
• Scoring Systems in Computer-Based Training for Digital MammographyPaul Taylor, Mark Hartswood, Lilian Blot, Rob Procter, Stuart Anderson. 490-496 [doi]
• The Effect of Slab Size on Mass Detection Performance of a Screen-Film CAD System in Reconstructed Tomosynthesis VolumesGuido van Schie, Karin Leifland, Matthew Wallis, Elin Moa, Magnus Hemmendorff, Nico Karssemeijer. 497-504 [doi]
• Synthesising Malignant Breast Masses in Normal MammogramsMichael Berks, Chris Taylor, Rumana Rahim, David Barbosa da Silva, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Susan M. Astley. 505-512 [doi]
• Comparison of Microcalcification Detection Rates and Recall Rates in Digital and Analogue MammographyNicola Barr, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Nicky B. Barr, Mary Wilson, Julie Morris, Michael Berks, Susan M. Astley. 513-517 [doi]
• Constancy Checking of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis SystemsJürgen Jacobs, Nicholas Marshall, Lesley Cockmartin, Ehsan Samei, Hilde Bosmans. 518-525 [doi]
• Mammographic Image Segmentation and Risk Classification Using a Novel Texture Signature Based MethodologyWenda He, Erika R. E. Denton, Reyer Zwiggelaar. 526-533 [doi]
• Stratified Sampling for Case Selection Criteria for Evaluating CADRobert M. Nishikawa, Lorenzo L. Pesce. 534-539 [doi]
• Breast Shapes on Real and Simulated MammogramsChristine Tanner, John H. Hipwell, David J. Hawkes, Gábor Székely. 540-547 [doi]
• Regularization Parameter Selection in Maximum a Posteriori Iterative Reconstruction for Digital Breast TomosynthesisAnna K. Jerebko, Markus Kowarschik, Thomas Mertelmeier. 548-555 [doi]
• Image Quality Phantom in Close Compliance with the ICRU-44 Breast Tissue Substitute Standard and Realistic Background Noise Pattern for Digital Breast TomosynthesisSteven Raeymaeckers, Nico Buls, Gert Van Gompel, Cathérine Breucq, Johan de Mey. 556-560 [doi]
• The Standard Attenuation Rate for Quantitative MammographyChristopher E. Tromans, Michael Brady. 561-568 [doi]
• National Software Supported Quality Assurance Program in Digital Mammography: Experiences and ChallengesChristian Moll, Andreas Jahnen, Alex Meyer, Martine Grelot, Johannes Hermen, Carlo Back, Marie-Christine Wagnon, Norbert Rösch. 569-575 [doi]
• Inter and Intra Observer Variability in a Semi-automatic Method for Measuring Volumetric Breast DensityRosanne Verow, Michael Berks, Jennifer Diffey, Camilla Chung, Joanna Morrison, Mary Wilson, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Nicky B. Barr, Julie Morris, Alan Hufton, Susan M. Astley. 576-582 [doi]
• Optimization of the Exposure Parameters with Signal-to-Noise Ratios Considering Human Visual Characteristics in Digital MammographyMaki Yamada, Yuri Kato, Naotoshi Fujita, Yoshie Kodera. 583-590 [doi]
• Ideal Observer Comparison between Tomographic and Projection x-Ray Images of the BreastJohn M. Boone, Nathan J. Packard, Craig K. Abbey. 591-597 [doi]
• Breast Structural Noise in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Its Dependence on Reconstruction MethodsYue-Houng Hu, Michael Masiar, Wei Zhao. 598-605 [doi]
• Effect of BI-RADS Assessment in Improving CAD of MassesAntonio García-Manso, Carlos J. García Orellana, Ramón Gallardo Caballero, Horacio M. González Velasco, Miguel Macías Macías. 614-621 [doi]
• Analysis of the Benefit/Risk Ratio Obtained in the Valencian Breast Early Detection Program During 2007 and 2008Ricardo Tortosa, Juan Ignacio Villaescusa, Miguel Ramos, Gumersindo Verdú. 622-627 [doi]
• Monte Carlo Simulation of Scatter Field for Calculation of Contrast of Discs in Synthetic CDMAM ImagesOliver Díaz, Mary Yip, Jorge Cabello, David R. Dance, Kenneth C. Young, Kevin Wells. 628-635 [doi]
• Classifying Breast Masses in Volumetric Whole Breast Ultrasound Data: A 2.5-Dimensional ApproachGobert N. Lee, Toshiaki Okada, Daisuke Fukuoka, Chisako Muramatsu, Takeshi Hara, Takako Morita, Etsuo Takada, Tokiko Endo, Hiroshi Fujita. 636-642 [doi]
• A supplement to the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and DiagnosisRuben E. van Engen, Kenneth C. Young, Hilde Bosmans, Barbara Lazzari, Stephan Schopphoven, Patrice Heid, Martin Thijssen. 643-650 [doi]
• Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast DensityBaorui Ren, Andrew P. Smith, Julian Marshall. 651-658 [doi]
• Performance of the New Double Layer Amorphous Selenium Detector for Digital Mammography Compared to the FDA Approved CR System for Digital MammographyRafael Salvador, Rafael Salvador-Izquierdo, Leonardo Romero, Xavier Salvador-Izquierdo, Manuel Salvador. 659-663 [doi]
• Machine Learning Techniques and Mammographic Risk AssessmentNeil MacParthalain, Reyer Zwiggelaar. 664-672 [doi]
• Automatic BI-RADS Description of Mammographic MassesFabián Narváez, Gloria Díaz, Eduardo Romero. 673-681 [doi]
• A Clustering Method for the Extraction of Microcalcifications Using Epipolar Curves in Digital Breast TomosynthesisCandy P. S. Ho, Christopher E. Tromans, Julia A. Schnabel, Michael Brady. 682-688 [doi]
• Software Framework for Simulating Clusters of Microcalcifications in Digital MammographyFederica Zanca, Guozhi Zhang, Nicholas Marshall, Eman Shaheen, Elena Salvagnini, Guy Marchal, Hilde Bosmans. 689-696 [doi]
• Improved Microcalcification Detection for Breast Tomosynthesis Using a Penalized-Maximum-Likelihood Reconstruction MethodMini Das, Howard C. Gifford, J. Michael O Connor, Stephen J. Glick. 697-703 [doi]
• Microcalcification Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using an Epipolar Curve ApproachCandy P. S. Ho, Christopher E. Tromans, Julia A. Schnabel, Michael Brady. 704-711 [doi]
• Spiculated Lesions and Architectural Distortions Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis DatasetsGiovanni Palma, Isabelle Bloch, Serge Muller. 712-719 [doi]
• An Observer Model for Lesion Detectability in Contrast-Enhanced Digital MammographyMelissa L. Hill, James G. Mainprize, Martin J. Yaffe. 720-727 [doi]
• Fast Deformation Simulation of Breasts Using GPU-Based Dynamic Explicit Finite Element MethodLianghao Han, John H. Hipwell, Zeike A. Taylor, Christine Tanner, Sébastien Ourselin, David J. Hawkes. 728-735 [doi]
• Breast Image Registration by Combining Finite Elements and Free-Form DeformationsAngela W. C. Lee, Julia A. Schnabel, Vijay Rajagopal, Poul M. F. Nielsen, Martyn P. Nash. 736-743 [doi]
• The Effect of Motion Correction on Pharmacokinetic Parameter EstimationAndrew Melbourne, John H. Hipwell, David J. Hawkes. 744-751 [doi]
• Improved Detection of Cancer in Screening Mammograms by Temporal ComparisonFei Ma, Mariusz Bajger, Simon Williams, Murk J. Bottema. 752-759 [doi]
• Combined Reconstruction and Registration of Digital Breast TomosynthesisGuang Yang, John H. Hipwell, Matthew J. Clarkson, Christine Tanner, Thomy Mertzanidou, Spencer Gunn, Sébastien Ourselin, David J. Hawkes, Simon R. Arridge. 760-768 [doi]