Abstract is missing.
- Inherent vs. accidental vs. intentional difficulties in programmingBrad A. Myers. 1-2 [doi]
- An empirical comparison of the accuracy rates of novices using the quorum, perl, and randomo programming languagesAndreas Stefik, Susanna Siebert, Melissa Stefik, Kim Slattery. 3-8 [doi]
- Heuristic evaluation of programming language features: two parallel programming case studiesCaitlin Sadowski, Sri Kurniawan. 9-14 [doi]
- How to rate programming skills in programming experiments?: a preliminary, exploratory, study based on university marks, pretests, and self-estimationSebastian Kleinschmager, Stefan Hanenberg. 15-24 [doi]
- Capturing and analyzing low-level events from the code editorYoungSeok Yoon, Brad A. Myers. 25-30 [doi]
- The need for richer refactoring usage dataMohsen Vakilian, Nicholas Chen, Stas Negara, Balaji Ambresh Rajkumar, Roshanak Zilouchian Moghaddam, Ralph E. Johnson. 31-38 [doi]
- Using metaphors from natural discussion to improve the design of arcumMacneil Shonle, William G. Griswold, Sorin Lerner. 39-44 [doi]
- Designing useful tools for developersThomas D. LaToza, Brad A. Myers. 45-50 [doi]
- Are object protocols burdensome?: an empirical study of developer forumsCiera Jaspan, Jonathan Aldrich. 51-56 [doi]
- How much information do software metrics contain?Yossi Gil, Maayan Goldstein, Dany Moshkovich. 57-64 [doi]
- Quality in use of domain-specific languages: a case studyAnkica Barisic, Vasco Amaral, Miguel Goulão, Bruno Barroca. 65-72 [doi]
- Categorization of concerns: a categorical program comprehension modelTim Frey, Marius Gelhausen, Gunter Saake. 73-82 [doi]