Abstract is missing.
- Towards assigning value to multimedia QOEMiguel Rios Quintero, Alexander Raake. 1-6 [doi]
- Open Profiling of Quality: Probing the method in the context of useDominik Strohmeier, Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö, Katja Eulenberg. 7-12 [doi]
- Combination of physiological and subjective measures to assess quality of experience for audiovisual technologiesJulie Lassalle, Laetitia Gros, Gilles Coppin. 13-18 [doi]
- QOE-driven mobility management - Integrating the users' quality perception into network - Level decision makingMartín Varela, Jukka-Pekka Laulajainen. 19-24 [doi]
- Subjective quality assessment of scalable video coding: A surveyJong-Seok Lee, Francesca De Simone, Touradj Ebrahimi. 25-30 [doi]
- No-reference video quality assessment for SD and HD H.264/AVC sequences based on continuous estimates of packet loss visibilitySavvas Argyropoulos, Alexander Raake, Marie-Neige Garcia, Peter List. 31-36 [doi]
- Subjective characteristics for stereoscopic high definition videoKazuhisa Yamagishi, Lina J. Karam, Jun Okamoto, Takanori Hayashi. 37-42 [doi]
- On the way to high-quality video calls in future mobile networksBlazej Lewcio, Benjamin Belmudez, Theresa Enghardt, Sebastian Möller. 43-48 [doi]
- Design of no-reference video quality metrics with multiway partial least squares regressionChristian Keimel, Julian Habigt, Manuel Klimpke, Klaus Diepold. 49-54 [doi]
- Spatial flicker effect in video scalingPengpeng Ni, Ragnhild Eg, Alexander Eichhorn, Carsten Griwodz, Pål Halvorsen. 55-60 [doi]
- Standardized toolchain and model development for video quality assessment - The mission of the Joint Effort Group in VQEGNicolas Staelens, Iñigo Sedano, Marcus Barkowsky, Lucjan Janowski, Kjell Brunnström, Patrick Le Callet. 61-66 [doi]
- Quality evaluation of stereoscopic videos using depth map segmentationSelim S. Sarikan, Ramazan F. Olgun, Gözde B. Akar. 67-71 [doi]
- A multi-metric fusion approach to visual quality assessmentTsung-Jung Liu, Weisi Lin, C. C. Jay Kuo. 72-77 [doi]
- No-reference image visual quality assessment using nonlinear regressionMartin D. Dimitrievski, Zoran A. Ivanovski, Tomislav Kartalov. 78-83 [doi]
- Spatial-temporal Video Quality Metric based on an estimation of QoES. A. Amirshahi, M.-C. Larabi. 84-89 [doi]
- Video quality assessment by decoupling additive impairments and detail lossesSongnan Li, Lin Ma, King Ngi Ngan. 90-95 [doi]
- Efficient frame complexity estimation and application to G.1070 vide quality monitoringBeibei Wang, Dekun Zou, Ran Ding, Tao Liu, Sitaram Bhagavathy, Niranjan D. Narvekar, Jeffrey A. Bloom. 96-101 [doi]
- Frame-layer packet-based parametric video quality model for encrypted video in IPTV servicesMarie-Neige Garcia, Alexander Raake. 102-106 [doi]
- A new dimension-based framework model for the quality of speech communication servicesSebastian Möller, Jens Berger, Alexander Raake, Marcel Wältermann, Benjamin Weiss. 107-112 [doi]
- Subjective visual quality assessment in the presence of audio for Digital CinemaFitri N. Rahayu, Ulrich Reiter, Junyong You, Andrew Perkis, Touradj Ebrahimi. 113-118 [doi]
- A conversation analytic approach to the prediction of leadership in two to six-party audio conferencesKatrin Schoenenberg, Alexander Raake, Janto Skowronek. 119-124 [doi]
- Exploring the acceptability of the audiovisual quality for a mobile video session based on objectively measured parametersToon De Pessemier, Katrien De Moor, Adrian Juan Verdejo, Davy Van Deursen, Wout Joseph, Lieven De Marez, Luc Martens, Rik Van de Walle. 125-130 [doi]
- SOS: The MOS is not enough!Tobias Hoßfeld, Raimund Schatz, Sebastian Egger. 131-136 [doi]
- Comparison of two mixed methods approaches for multimodal quality evaluations: Open Profiling of Quality and Conventional ProfilingKristina Kunze, Dominik Strohmeier, Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö. 137-142 [doi]
- Multimedia user feedback based on augmenting user tags with EEG emotional statesStephen J. Davis, Eva Cheng, Ian S. Burnett, Christian Ritz. 143-148 [doi]
- Subjective quality factors in packet 3D videoLuis Pinto, João Carreira, Sérgio M. M. de Faria, Nuno M. M. Rodrigues, Pedro A. Amado Assunção. 149-154 [doi]
- The influence of relative disparity and planar motion velocity on visual discomfort of stereoscopic videosJing Li, Marcus Barkowsky, Patrick Le Callet. 155-160 [doi]
- Subjective comparison of temporal and quality scalabilityJari Korhonen, Ulrich Reiter, Junyong You. 161-166 [doi]
- How the task of evaluating image quality influences viewing behaviorHani Alers, Lennart Bos, Ingrid Heynderickx. 167-172 [doi]
- Contrast effect on 3D and 2D video perceptionZicong Mai, Mahsa T. Pourazad, Panos Nasiopoulos. 173-176 [doi]
- Impact of end devices on subjective video quality assessment for QCIF video sequencesAsiya Khan, Lingfen Sun, Jose O. Fajardo, Ianire Taboada, Fidel Liberal, Emmanuel C. Ifeachor. 177-182 [doi]
- Towards an inter-observer analysis framework for multimedia quality assessmentUlrich Engelke, Yohann Pitrey, Patrick Le Callet. 183-188 [doi]
- SSIM as global quality metric: A differential geometry viewThomas Richter. 189-194 [doi]
- Automatic prediction of saliency on JPEG distorted imagesAnish Mittal, Anush K. Moorthy, Alan C. Bovik, Lawrence K. Cormack. 195-200 [doi]
- Image quality and visual attention interactions: Towards a more reliable analysis in the saliency spaceJudith Redi, Ingrid Heynderickx. 201-206 [doi]
- Examining visual attention: A method for revealing users' interest for images on screenSeyed Navid Haji Mirza, Ebroul Izquierdo. 207-212 [doi]