Table of Contents

• Unperturbed video streaming QoE under web page related context factorsMichael Seufert, Ondrej Zach, Martin Slanina, Phuoc Tran-Gia. 1-6 [doi]
• Testing conversational quality of VoIP with different terminals and degradationsMichal Soloducha, Alexander Raake, Frank Kettler, Stefan Bleiholder. 1-3 [doi]
• Assessing the impact of inaccurate decision support systems on experts' behavior and decisionsClemens Schcoll, Sebastian Möller, August Longino. 1-3 [doi]
• Experimental evaluation of WebRTC voice quality in LTE coverage testsNajmeddine Majed, Stephane Ragot, Xavier Lagrange, Alberto Blanc, Jercome Dufour, Guillaume Grao. 1-6 [doi]
• No-reference quality assessment for JPEG compressed imagesYucheng Zhu, Guangtao Zhai, Ke Gu, Wenhan Zhu. 1-6 [doi]
• The Konstanz natural video database (KoNViD-1k)Vlad Hosu, Franz Hahn, Mohsen Jenadeleh, Hanhe Lin, Hui Men, Tamás Szirányi, Shujun Li, Dietmar Saupe. 1-6 [doi]
• Modeling the overall quality of experience on the basis of underlying quality dimensionsFriedemann Köster, Gabriel Mittag, Sebastian Möller. 1-6 [doi]
• No silver bullet: QoE metrics, QoE fairness, and user diversity in the context of QoE managementTobias Hoßfeld, Poul E. Heegaard, Lea Skorin-Kapov, Martín Varela. 1-6 [doi]
• Measuring the added value of haptic feedbackEmanuela Maggioni, Erika Agostinelli, Marianna Obrist. 1-6 [doi]
• Unsupervised QoE field study for mobile YouTube video streaming with YoMoAppMichael Seufert, Nikolas Wehner, Florian Wamser, Pedro Casas, Alessandro D'Alconzo, Phuoc Tran-Gia. 1-6 [doi]
• Assessment of lossy images with visual detection and saccadic eye movementsShun-Nan Yang, Ju Liu, Juliana Knopf, Hannah Colett, Philip J. Corriveau. 1-3 [doi]
• Spatial immersion versus emotional immersion, which is more immersive?Chenyan Zhang, Andrew Perkis, Sebastian Arndt. 1-6 [doi]
• Exploring users views on immersive adult entertainment applicationsXijie Zhang, Florian Weidner, Wolfgang Broll. 1-3 [doi]
• Impact of interactivity on the assessment of quality of experience for light field contentIrene Viola, Martin Rerábek, Touradj Ebrahimi. 1-6 [doi]
• Modelling speech service quality: From conversational phases to communication quality and service qualitySebastian Möller, Friedemann Köster, Benjamin Weiss 0001. 1-3 [doi]
• A framework for post-stroke quality of life prediction using structured predictionAndrew Hines, John D. Kelleher. 1-6 [doi]
• P.1203 evaluation of real OTT video servicesShahid M. Satti, Christian Schmidmer, Matthias Obermann, Roland Bitto, Lavita Agarwal, Michael Keyhl. 1-3 [doi]
• Predicting QoE in cellular networks using machine learning and in-smartphone measurementsPedro Casas, Alessandro D'Alconzo, Florian Wamser, Michael Seufert, Bruno Gardlo, Anika Schwind, Phuoc Tran-Gia, Raimund Schatz. 1-6 [doi]
• H.264/MPEG-AVC, H.265/MPEG-HEVC and VP9 codec comparison for live gaming video streamingNabajeet Barman, Maria G. Martini. 1-6 [doi]
• Perceptual video quality evaluation by means of physiological signalsPablo Arnau-González, Turke Althobaiti, Stamos Katsigiannis, Naeem Ramzan. 1-6 [doi]
• A bitstream-based, scalable video-quality model for HTTP adaptive streaming: ITU-T P.1203.1Alexander Raake, Marie-Neige Garcia, Werner Robitza, Peter List, Steve Göring, Bernhard Feiten. 1-6 [doi]
• Evaluation of single-artifact based video quality metrics in video communication contextInes Saidi, Lu Zhang, Vincent Barriac, Olivier Déforges. 1-3 [doi]
• Preference identification for images using the change of the amount of blood in frontal lobe with NIRSYang Du, Daiki Sawada, Dorin Gutu, Yasuhiro Inazumi, Keiji Shibata, Yuukou Horita. 1-3 [doi]
• A QoE evaluation of immersive augmented and virtual reality speech & language assessment applicationsConor Keighrey, Ronan Flynn, Siobhan Murray, Niall Murray. 1-6 [doi]
• Measuring and comparing QoE and simulator sickness of omnidirectional videos in different head mounted displaysAshutosh Singla, Stephan Fremerey, Werner Robitza, Alexander Raake. 1-6 [doi]
• Defining the relevant perceptual quality space for video and video-telephonyFalk Schiffner, Sebastian Möller. 1-3 [doi]
• Quantitative evaluation of omnidirectional video qualityNeil Birkbeck, Chip Brown, Robert Suderman. 1-3 [doi]
• Look around you: Saliency maps for omnidirectional images in VR applicationsAna De Abreu, Cagri Ozcinar, Aljosa Smolic. 1-6 [doi]
• Which saliency weighting for omni directional image quality assessment?Yashas Rai, Patrick Le Callet, Philippe Guillotel. 1-6 [doi]
• Scoring voice likability using pair-comparison: Laboratory vs. crowdsourcing approachRafael Zequeira Jimenez, Laura Fernandez Gallardo, Sebastian Möller. 1-3 [doi]
• Modelling brightness perception for high dynamic range televisionKaty C. Noland, Manish Pindoria, Andrew Cotton. 1-6 [doi]
• No reference quality assessment for stereoscopic images by statistical featuresYuming Fang, Jiebin Yan, Jiheng Wang. 1-6 [doi]
• Towards the delay sensitivity of games: There is more than genresSteven Schmidt, Saman Zadtootaghaj, Sebastian Möller. 1-6 [doi]
• Emerging video coding performance: 4K quality monitoringNaty Ould Sidaty, Wassim Hamidouche, Olivier Déforges, Pierrick Philippe. 1-3 [doi]
• Towards subjective quality of experience assessment for omnidirectional video streamingRaimund Schatz, Andreas Sackl, Christian Timmerer, Bruno Gardlo. 1-6 [doi]
• A modular HTTP adaptive streaming QoE model - Candidate for ITU-T P.1203 ("P.NATS")Werner Robitza, Marie-Neige Garcia, Alexander Raake. 1-6 [doi]
• On the edge of the seat: Reduced angular resolution of a light field cinema with fixed observer positionsPéter András Kara, Aron Cserkaszky, Subbareddy Darukumalli, Attila Barsi, Maria G. Martini. 1-6 [doi]
• QoE-based brightness control for HDR displaysCambodge Bist, Rémi Cozot, Gérard Madec, Xavier Ducloux. 1-6 [doi]
• Blind DIBR-synthesized image quality assessment based on sparsity features in morphological multiscale domainDejan Bokan, Gordana Velikic, Dragan Kukolj, Dragana Sandic-Stankovic. 1-3 [doi]
• Characterization and selection of light field content for perceptual assessmentPradip Paudyal, Jesús Gutiérrez, Patrick Le Callet, Marco Carli, Federica Battisti. 1-6 [doi]
• The label knows better: The impact of labeling effects on perceived quality of HD and UHD video streamingPéter András Kara, Werner Robitza, Alexander Raake, Maria G. Martini. 1-6 [doi]
• Evaluation of binaural reproduction systems from behavioral patterns in a six-degrees-of-freedom wayfinding taskOlli Rummukainen, Sebastian J. Schlecht, Axel Plinge, Emanuel A. P. Habets. 1-3 [doi]
• Speech reaction time measurements for the evaluation of audio-visual spatial coherenceHanne Stenzel, Philip J. B. Jackson, Jon Francombe. 1-6 [doi]
• Collecting subjective ratings in enterprise environmentsKathrin Borchert, Matthias Hirth, Thomas Zinner, Anja S. Göritz. 1-3 [doi]
• Quality of augmented reality experience: A correlation analysisUlrich Engelke, Huyen Nguyen, Sarah Ketchell. 1-3 [doi]
• Effect of color space on high dynamic range video compression performanceEmin Zerman, Vedad Hulusic, Giuseppe Valenzise, Rafal Mantiuk, Frédéric Dufaux. 1-6 [doi]
• Predicting personal preferences in subjective video quality assessmentJari Korhonen. 1-6 [doi]
• No-reference quality assessment of tone mapped High Dynamic Range (HDR) images using transfer learningV. Abhinau Kumar, Shashank Gupta, Sai Sheetal Chandra, Shanmuganathan Raman, Sumohana S. Channappayya. 1-3 [doi]
• On the performance of objective metrics for omnidirectional visual contentEvgeniy Upenik, Martin Rerábek, Touradj Ebrahimi. 1-6 [doi]
• Empirical evaluation of no-reference VQA methods on a natural video quality databaseHui Men, Hanhe Lin, Dietmar Saupe. 1-3 [doi]
• Towards the need satisfaction in gaming: A comparison of different gaming platformsAnne-Flore Perrin, Touradj Ebrahimi, Saman Zadtootaghaj, Steven Schmidt, Sebastian Möller. 1-3 [doi]
• Performance and QoE assessment of HTC Vive and Oculus Rift for pick-and-place tasks in VRMirko Suznjevic, Matija Mandurov, Maja Matijasevic. 1-3 [doi]
• A nonlinear quality of experience model for high dynamic spatio-temporal mulsemediaLana Jalal, Maurizio Murroni. 1-6 [doi]
• Reduced-reference image quality assessment based on internal generative mechanism utilizing shearlets and Rényi entropy analysisSaeed Mahmoudpour, Peter Schelkens. 1-5 [doi]
• Olfactory-enhanced multimedia video clips datasetsNiall Murray, Oluwakemi Adewunmi Ademoye, George Ghinea, Yuansong Qiao, Gabriel-Miro Muntean, Brian Lee. 1-5 [doi]
• On subjective and objective quality evaluation of point cloud geometryEvangelos Alexiou, Touradj Ebrahimi. 1-3 [doi]
• A framework for QoE analysis of encrypted video streamsSteve Göring, Alexander Raake, Bernhard Feiten. 1-3 [doi]
• A software radio LTE network testbed for video quality of experience experimentationIsmael Gómez Miguelez, Paul Sutton Avishek Nag, Ahmed Selim, Linda Doyle, Vivek Ramachandran, Anil C. Kokaram. 1-3 [doi]
• Analysis of problem tokens to rank factors impacting quality in VoIP applicationsJayant Gupchup, Yasaman Hosseinkashi, Martin Ellis, Sam Johnson, Ross Cutler. 1-6 [doi]
• QoE design tradeoffs for foveated content provisionPietro Lungaro, Konrad Tollmar. 1-3 [doi]
• Position paper: Quality-of-experience of cyber-physical system applicationsFlorian Hammer, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, Sebastian Möller. 1-3 [doi]
• Exploring diverse measures for evaluating QoE in the context of WebRTCKatrien De Moor, Sebastian Arndt, Doreid Ammar, Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons, Andrew Perkis, Poul E. Heegaard. 1-3 [doi]