Table of Contents

• Characterizing architectural information in commit messages: an exploratory studyTiago Oliveira Motta, Rodrigo Rocha Gomes e Souza, Cláudio Sant'Anna. 12-21 [doi]
• Understanding architecture non-conformance: why is there a gap between conceptual architectural rules and source code dependencies?Vanius Zapalowski, Daltro José Nunes, Ingrid Nunes. 22-31 [doi]
• An experience report on the adoption of microservices in three Brazilian government institutionsWelder Pinheiro Luz, Everton Agilar, Marcos César de Oliveira 0001, Carlos Eduardo R. de Melo, Gustavo Pinto 0001, Rodrigo Bonifácio. 32-41 [doi]
• On challenges in engineering IoT software systemsRebeca Campos Motta, Káthia M. de Oliveira, Guilherme H. Travassos. 42-51 [doi]
• Threats to validity in controlled experiments in software engineering: what the experts say and why this is relevantEudis Teixeira, Liliane Fonseca, Sérgio Soares. 52-61 [doi]
• An empirical study on task documentation in software crowdsourcing: the case of the topcoder platformLuis Vaz, Sabrina Marczak, Igor Steinmacher. 62-71 [doi]
• Visual notations for software pattern languages: a mapping studyGlaice Kelly da Silva Quirino, Monalessa Perini Barcellos, Ricardo de Almeida Falbo. 72-81 [doi]
• Business value characterization in software projects for electronic government in the Brazilian federal governmentFrancisco José Rêgo Lopes, Mariela Inés Cortés. 82-91 [doi]
• The contribution of non-technical stakeholders on the specification of UX requirements: an experimental study using the proto-persona techniqueEduardo Gouveia Pinheiro, Larissa Albano Lopes, Tayana Uchôa Conte, Luciana Aparecida Martinez Zaina. 92-101 [doi]
• NFRfinder: a knowledge based strategy for mining non-functional requirementsRoxana Lisette Quintanilla Portugal, Tong Li, Lyrene Fernandes da Silva, Eduardo Almentero, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite. 102-111 [doi]
• Specifying privacy requirements with goal-oriented modeling languagesMariana Maia Peixoto, Carla Silva. 112-121 [doi]
• Using code quality features to predict bugs in procedural software systemsCristiano Werner Araújo, Vanius Zapalowski, Ingrid Nunes. 122-131 [doi]
• Please please me: does the presence of test cases influence mobile app users' satisfaction?Vinicius H. S. Durelli, Rafael Serapilha Durelli, André Takeshi Endo, Elder Cirilo, Washington Luiz, Leonardo C. da Rocha. 132-141 [doi]
• A machine learning approach to generate test oraclesRonyérison Braga, Pedro de Alcântara dos Santos Neto, Ricardo de Andrade Lira Rabelo, José Santiago, Matheus Souza. 142-151 [doi]
• Can automated test case generation cope with extract method validation?Indy P. S. C. Silva, Everton L. G. Alves, Patrícia D. L. Machado. 152-161 [doi]
• Multiple objective test set selection for software product line testing: evaluating different preference-based algorithmsHelson Luiz Jakubovski Filho, Thiago do Nascimento Ferreira, Silvia Regina Vergilio. 162-171 [doi]
• An analysis on tools for accessibility evaluation in mobile applicationsClauirton A. Siebra, Walter Correia, Marcelo Penha, Jefte Macedo, Jonysberg P. Quintino, Marcelo Anjos, Fabiana Florentin, Fabio Q. B. da Silva, André L. M. Santos. 172-177 [doi]
• Method for privacy requirements elicitation in ubiquitous computingDeógenes Pereira da Silva Junior, Patricia Cristiane de Souza, Cristiano Maciel. 178-183 [doi]
• Evaluating strategies for forward snowballing application to support secondary studies updates: emergent resultsKatia Romero Felizardo, Anderson Y. Iwazaki da Silva, Érica Ferreira de Souza, Nandamudi L. Vijaykumar, Elisa Yumi Nakagawa. 184-189 [doi]
• Where are the minimal mutants?Márcio Eduardo Delamaro, Marcos Lordello Chaim, José Carlos Maldonado. 190-195 [doi]
• Safe-RE: a safety requirements metamodel based on industry safety standardsJéssyka Vilela, Jaelson Castro, Luiz Eduardo Galvão Martins, Tony Gorschek. 196-201 [doi]
• On the sustainability of academic software: the case of static analysis toolsJoenio Costa, Paulo Meirelles, Christina Chavez. 202-207 [doi]
• Towards a domain-specific modeling language for self-adaptive systems conceptual modelingJoão Pablo S. da Silva, Miguel Ecar, Marcelo Soares Pimenta, Gilleanes T. A. Guedes, Elder Macedo Rodrigues. 208-213 [doi]
• Correlations between invisibility and usability in ubicomp and IoT applications: partial resultsRainara Maia Carvalho, Rossana M. C. Andrade, Káthia Marçal de Oliveira. 214-219 [doi]
• An experience report on teaching multiple design thinking techniques to software engineering studentsAnderson Felipe Souza, Bruna Ferreira, Natasha M. Costa Valentim, Tayana Conte. 220-229 [doi]
• Identifying emerging topics and difficulties in software engineering education in BrazilThaís Ferreira, Davi Viana, Juliana Fernandes, Rodrigo Pereira dos Santos. 230-239 [doi]
• An agile project management experience: points of view of graduate studentsKamila Takayama Lyra, Marcela Lopes Alves, Fernando H. Carvalho Silva, Kathiani Souza, Seiji Isotani. 240-249 [doi]
• FLOSS in software engineering education: an update of a systematic mapping studyMoara Sousa Brito, Fernanda Gomes Silva, Christina von Flach G. Chavez, Debora Maria Coelho Nascimento, Roberto Almeida Bittencourt. 250-259 [doi]
• When students become contributors: leveraging OSS contributions in software engineering coursesClarice Ferreira, Cleice Souza, Gustavo Pinto 0001, Igor Steinmacher, Paulo Meirelles. 260-269 [doi]
• Software maintenance: what do we teach and what does the industry practice?Andréa Sabedra Bordin, Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti. 270-279 [doi]
• Software creation workshop: a capstone course for business-oriented software engineering teachingSofia Costa Paiva, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Carvalho. 280-288 [doi]
• TBL as an active learning-teaching methodology for software engineering coursesCristiane Soares Ramos, Ricardo Ajax Dias Kosloski, Elaine Venson, Rejane Maria da Costa Figueiredo, Victor Hugo A. Deon. 289-297 [doi]
• GreaTest: a card game to motivate the software testing learningThiago A. Beppe, Italo Linhares de Araújo, Bruno Sabóia Aragão, Ismayle de Sousa Santos, Davi Ximenes, Rossana M. de Castro Andrade. 298-307 [doi]
• What are the differences between group and individual modeling when learning UML?Williamson Silva, Bruno Gadelha, Igor Steinmacher, Tayana Conte. 308-317 [doi]
• Multidisciplinary groups learning to develop mobile applications from the challenge based learning methodologyAndrew Diniz da Costa, Carlos José Pereira de Lucena, Hendi Lemos Coelho, Gustavo Robichez Carvalho, Hugo Fuks, Ricardo Almeida Venieris. 318-327 [doi]
• Non-conventional dynamics in a software engineering course: practical and ludic activitiesLis Ângela De Bortoli. 328-337 [doi]
• Supporting to the teaching and learning process in object orientation during the construction of class diagramsCláudio Marcio Felisbino, Adolfo Gustavo Serra Seca Neto, Laudelino Cordeiro Bastos. 338-347 [doi]
• Software engineering education in Brazil: a mapping studyJosé Adson O. G. da Cunha, Gabriel Araújo Marques, Wellington Lourenço Lemos, Uélio Dornelas Câmara Jr., Francisco J. S. Vasconcellos. 348-356 [doi]