Journal: J. Informetrics

Volume 13, Issue 4

0 -- 0Chung-Huei Kuan, Dar-Zen Chen, Mu-Hsuan Huang. Bibliographically coupled patents: Their temporal pattern and combined relevance
0 -- 0László Csató. Journal ranking should depend on the level of aggregation
0 -- 0Javier Gómez-Ferri, Gregorio González-Alcaide, Ramón LLopis-Goig. Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers' perception
0 -- 0Teresa Muñoz-Écija, Benjamín Vargas-Quesada, Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez. Coping with methods for delineating emerging fields: Nanoscience and nanotechnology as a case study
0 -- 0Pablo E. Pinto, Andres Vallone, Guillermo Honores. The structure of collaboration networks: Findings from three decades of co-invention patents in Chile
0 -- 0Shuo Xu, Liyuan Hao, Xin An, Guancan Yang, Feifei Wang. Emerging research topics detection with multiple machine learning models
0 -- 0Esra Eren Bayindir, Mehmet Yigit Gurdal, Ismail Saglam. A Game Theoretic Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals
0 -- 0Xiaorui Jiang, Hai Zhuge. Forward search path count as an alternative indirect citation impact indicator
0 -- 0Yurij L. Katchanov, Yulia V. Markova, Natalia A. Shmatko. The distinction machine: Physics journals from the perspective of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic
0 -- 0Lutz Bornmann, Alexander Tekles, Helena H. Zhang, Fred Y. Ye. Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data
0 -- 0Su Jung Jee, Minji Kwon, Jung Moon Ha, So Young Sohn. Exploring the forward citation patterns of patents based on the evolution of technology fields
0 -- 0Alexander M. Petersen. Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE

Volume 13, Issue 3

769 -- 770Yan-An Hwang, Chih-Hao Chiu, Jian-Ming Shih. A correction: Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach
771 -- 784Zekai He, Ni Zhen, Chaojiang Wu. Measuring and exploring the geographic mobility of American professors from graduating institutions: Differences across disciplines, academic ranks, and genders
785 -- 792Leo Egghe, Ronald Rousseau 0001. 2[0, T], using generalized h- and g-indices
793 -- 803Daniel Torres-Salinas, Esteban Romero-Frías, Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado. Mapping the backbone of the Humanities through the eyes of Wikipedia
804 -- 816Przemyslaw Korytkowski, Emanuel Kulczycki. Publication counting methods for a national research evaluation exercise
817 -- 829Chao Lu, Yi Bu, Xianlei Dong, Jie Wang, Ying Ding 0001, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Logan Paul, Chengzhi Zhang. Analyzing linguistic complexity and scientific impact
830 -- 840Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa. When research assessment exercises leave room for opportunistic behavior by the subjects under evaluation
841 -- 855Houqiang Yu, Tingting Xiao, Shenmeng Xu, Yuefen Wang. Who posts scientific tweets? An investigation into the productivity, locations, and identities of scientific tweeters
856 -- 873Feifei Wang, Chenran Jia, Xiaohan Wang, Junwan Liu, Shuo Xu, Yang Liu, Chenyuyan Yang. Exploring all-author tripartite citation networks: A case study of gene editing
874 -- 886Kai Wang, Xiaojuan Liu, Yutong Han. Exploring Goodreads reviews for book impact assessment
887 -- 900Xiangjie Kong, Mengyi Mao, Huizhen Jiang, Shuo Yu, Liangtian Wan. How does collaboration affect researchers' positions in co-authorship networks?
901 -- 903Meiting Huang, Weishu Liu 0001. Substantial numbers of easily identifiable illegal DOIs still exist in Scopus
904 -- 905Loet Leydesdorff, Caroline S. Wagner, Lutz Bornmann. Diversity measurement: Steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity?
906 -- 907Ronald Rousseau 0001. On the Leydesdorff-Wagner-Bornmann proposal for diversity measurement

Volume 13, Issue 2

467 -- 484Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall. Can Google Scholar and Mendeley help to assess the scholarly impacts of dissertations?
485 -- 499Ali Abrishami, Sadegh Aliakbary. Predicting citation counts based on deep neural network learning techniques
500 -- 514Cristiano Giuffrida, Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo. Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items
515 -- 539Alessandro Strumia, Riccardo Torre. Biblioranking fundamental physics
540 -- 554Lutz Bornmann, António Osório. n-authors publications
555 -- 563Mike Thelwall. The rhetorical structure of science? A multidisciplinary analysis of article headings
564 -- 573Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa. Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output
574 -- 582Hyoungjoo Park, Dietmar Wolfram. Research software citation in the Data Citation Index: Current practices and implications for research software sharing and reuse
583 -- 592Lorenzo Righetto, Alessandro Spelta, Emanuele Rabosio, Fabio Pammolli. Long-term correlations in short, non-stationary time series: An application to international R&D collaborations
593 -- 604Carter Bloch, Thomas K. Ryan, Jens Peter Andersen. Public-private collaboration and scientific impact: An analysis based on Danish publication data for 1995-2013
605 -- 615Si Shen, Danhao Zhu, Ronald Rousseau 0001, Xinning Su, Dongbo Wang. A refined method for computing bibliographic coupling strengths
616 -- 634Yu Zhang, Min Wang 0009, Florian Gottwalt, Morteza Saberi, Elizabeth Chang 0001. Ranking scientific articles based on bibliometric networks with a weighting scheme
635 -- 642Amrita Purkayastha, Eleonora Palmaro, Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Jeroen Baas. Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)
643 -- 657Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel. How to consider fractional counting and field normalization in the statistical modeling of bibliometric data: A multilevel Poisson regression approach
658 -- 678Mike Thelwall. Should citations be counted separately from each originating section?
679 -- 694Gunnar Sivertsen, Ronald Rousseau 0001, Lin Zhang 0004. Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting
695 -- 707Robin Haunschild, Loet Leydesdorff, Lutz Bornmann, Iina Hellsten, Werner Marx. Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags
708 -- 716Pierpaolo Dondio, Niccolò Casnici, Francisco Grimaldo, Nigel Gilbert, Flaminio Squazzoni. The "invisible hand" of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal
717 -- 725Gui-Yuan Shi, Yi-Xiu Kong, Guang-Hui Yuan, Rui-Jie Wu, An Zeng, Matús Medo. Discoverers in scientific citation data
726 -- 737Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Samuele Di Russo. Testing for universality of Mendeley readership distributions
738 -- 750Sebastian Galiani, Ramiro H. Gálvez. An empirical approach based on quantile regression for estimating citation ageing
751 -- 756Has van Vlokhoven. The effect of open access on research quality
757 -- 768Christos Giatsidis, Giannis Nikolentzos, Chenhui Zhang, Jie Tang 0001, Michalis Vazirgiannis. Rooted citation graphs density metrics for research papers influence evaluation

Volume 13, Issue 1

1 -- 9Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Massimiliano Carloni. The balance of knowledge flows
10 -- 31Lovro Subelj, Dalibor Fiala, Tadej Ciglaric, Luka Kronegger. Convexity in scientific collaboration networks
32 -- 49Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Giovanni Felici. Predicting publication long-term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor
50 -- 63Nicolas Robinson-Garcia, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Dakota Murray, Alfredo Yegros-Yegros, Vincent Larivière, Rodrigo Costas. The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientists
64 -- 77J. Clemente-Gallardo, Alfredo Ferrer, David Iñiguez, Alejandro Rivero, Gonzalo-Ruiz, Alfonso Tarancón. Do researchers collaborate in a similar way to publish and to develop projects?
78 -- 86Federico Bianchi, Francisco Grimaldo, Flaminio Squazzoni. 3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals
87 -- 104Camil Demetrescu, Francesco Lupia, Angelo Mendicelli, Andrea Ribichini, Francesco Scarcello, Marco Schaerf. On the Shapley value and its application to the Italian VQR research assessment exercise
105 -- 117Giovanni Colavizza, Thomas Franssen, Thed N. van Leeuwen. An empirical investigation of the tribes and their territories: Are research specialisms rural and urban?
118 -- 131Mike Thelwall, Carol Bailey, Meiko Makita, Pardeep Sud, Devika P. Madalli. Gender and research publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality?
132 -- 148Jian Du, Peixin Li, Qianying Guo, Xiaoli Tang. Measuring the knowledge translation and convergence in pharmaceutical innovation by funding-science-technology-innovation linkages analysis
149 -- 169Mike Thelwall, Carol Bailey, Catherine Tobin, Noel-Ann Bradshaw. Gender differences in research areas, methods and topics: Can people and thing orientations explain the results?
170 -- 184Lutz Bornmann. Does the normalized citation impact of universities profit from certain properties of their published documents - such as the number of authors and the impact factor of the publishing journals? A multilevel modeling approach
185 -- 201Francesco Alessandro Massucci, Domingo Docampo. Measuring the academic reputation through citation networks via PageRank
202 -- 225Fei Shu, Charles-Antoine Julien, Lin Zhang, Junping Qiu, Jing Zhang, Vincent Larivière. Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science
226 -- 237Kai Li 0010, Erjia Yan. Are NIH-funded publications fulfilling the proposed research? An examination of concept-matchedness between NIH research grants and their supported publications
238 -- 254Sergio Copiello. Peer and neighborhood effects: Citation analysis using a spatial autoregressive model and pseudo-spatial data
255 -- 269Loet Leydesdorff, Caroline S. Wagner, Lutz Bornmann. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient
270 -- 290Marcel Dunaiski, Jaco Geldenhuys, Willem Visser. On the interplay between normalisation, bias, and performance of paper impact metrics
291 -- 298Leo Egghe, Ronald Rousseau. Infinite sequences and their h-type indices
299 -- 313Marcel Dunaiski, Jaco Geldenhuys, Willem Visser. Globalised vs averaged: Bias and ranking performance on the author level
314 -- 324Ricardo Brito, Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro. Evaluating research and researchers by the journal impact factor: Is it better than coin flipping?
325 -- 340Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Jonathan Adams 0001. Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF)
341 -- 353Zhiya Zuo, Kang Zhao, Chaoqun Ni. Standing on the shoulders of giants? - Faculty hiring in information schools
354 -- 386Chiara Carusi, Giuseppe Bianchi 0001. Scientific community detection via bipartite scholar/journal graph co-clustering
387 -- 396Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti, Tommaso Lando. How mean rank and mean size may determine the generalised Lorenz curve: With application to citation analysis
397 -- 406Xuelian Pan, Erjia Yan, Ming Cui, Weina Hua. How important is software to library and information science research? A content analysis of full-text publications
407 -- 418Xiaomei Bai, Fuli Zhang, Ivan Lee. Predicting the citations of scholarly paper
419 -- 433Lokman I. Meho. Using Scopus's CiteScore for assessing the quality of computer science conferences
434 -- 448Juan Carlos Valderrama Zurián, David Melero-Fuentes, Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent. Origin, characteristics, predominance and conceptual networks of eponyms in the bibliometric literature
449 -- 461Kai Li 0010, Pei-Ying Chen, Erjia Yan. lme4 R package
462 -- 463Lawrence J. Smolinsky. Odds ratios and Mantel-Haenszel quotients
464 -- 465Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Rüdiger Mutz. MHq indicators for zero-inflated count data - A response to the comment by Smolinsky (in press)