Journal: Learned Publishing

Volume 34, Issue 4

478 -- 486Jade Holt, Andrew Walker, Phill Jones. Introducing a data availability policy for journals at IOP Publishing: Measuring the impact on authors and editorial teams
487 -- 498Quan-Hoang Vuong, Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen, Manh-Toan Ho, Minh Hoang Nguyen 0003. Adopting open access in an emerging country: Is gender inequality a barrier in humanities and social sciences?
499 -- 509Youngseek Kim. A study of the determinants of psychologists' data sharing and open data badge adoption
510 -- 518Maria S. Plakhotnik. Has IMRD become IMRDi in management journals? Implications as an independent structural component of research articles
519 -- 527Tomas Koch, Raf Vanderstraeten. Journal editors and journal indexes: Internationalization pressures in the semi-periphery of the world of science
528 -- 536Lu Chen, Min Zhang, Wan Xiong, Qian Liu. Performance of China's journals indexed in SCIE: An evaluation based on megajournal metrics
537 -- 546Anna Severin, Joanna Chataway. Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects
547 -- 557Rafael J. Araújo, Geoffrey S. Shideler, Marcus B. Reamer. Chief editors in aquatic science and communication are more likely to oversee editorial boards from their own regions
558 -- 567Cristóbal Urbano, Sara Tafalla, Ángel Borrego, Ernest Abadal. Preprints as an alternative to conference proceedings: A hands-on experience at EDICIC Iberian Meeting 2019
568 -- 577Amandeep Khatter, Michael Naughton, Hajira Dambha-Miller, Patrick Redmond. Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers
578 -- 584Haoran Zhu. Home country bias in academic publishing: A case study of the New England Journal of Medicine
585 -- 592Janne Pölönen, Sami Syrjämäki, Antti-Jussi Nygård, Björn Hammarfelt. Who are the users of national open access journals? The case of the Finnish Journal.fi platform
593 -- 601Rafael Repiso, Jesús Segarra-Saavedra, Tatiana Hidalgo-Marí, Victoria Tur-Viñes. The prevalence and impact of special issues in communications journals 2015-2019
602 -- 611Victoria Hayes, Emma Williams, Kathleen M. Fairfield, Carolyne Falank, Dina McKelvy, Robert Bing-You. Impact of a new institutional medical journal on professional identity development and academic cultural change: A qualitative study
612 -- 621Miriam Wanjiku Ndungu. Scholarly journal publishing standards, policies and guidelines
622 -- 636Frederique Bordignon, Liana Ermakova, Marianne Noel. Over-promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID-19 crisis
637 -- 646Erwin Krauskopf. Article processing charge expenditure in Chile: The current situation
647 -- 654Itamar Ashkenazi, Oded Olsha. Honorific authorship and approval of the ICMJE criteria: A survey with a convenience sample
655 -- 665Margaret K. Merga. The academic labour of knowledge mobilization: What scholarly publishers need to know
666 -- 674Josip Simic, Matko Marusic, Marijana Gelo, Nikolina Saravanja, Aleksandra Misak, Ana Marusic. Long-term outcomes of 2-day training on planning and writing research on publication output of medical professionals: 11-year cohort study
675 -- 678Helina Marshall, Maria Fernandes. Early-career researchers shaping publishing strategy
679 -- 681Gert Helgesson. The two faces of the corresponding author and the need to separate them
682 -- 687Yu Wang, Liangbin Zhao. Blockchain for scholarly journal evaluation: Potential and prospects
688 -- 695Salim Moussa. Journal hijacking: Challenges and potential solutions
696 -- 700Philippe C. Baveye. Objectivity of the peer-review process: Enduring myth, reality, and possible remedies
701 -- 702. Award

Volume 34, Issue 3

294 -- 304Jennifer Rowley, Laura Sbaffi. Investigating gender differences in journal selection decisions: A survey of academic researchers
305 -- 314Margaret K. Merga, Shannon Mason. Perspectives on institutional valuing and support for academic and translational outputs in Japan and Australia
315 -- 330Mona Farouk Ali. Evaluating the correlation between different impact indicators for library and information science journals: Comparing the journal citation reports and scopus
331 -- 338Weishan Miao, Ying Huang. Politics matters: The power dynamics behind Chinese English-language humanities and social science journals
339 -- 346Antti Mikael Rousi. Ethical review and informed consent guidelines of high impact anthropology, business, and education research journals
347 -- 357Magdalena Szuflita-Zurawska, Beata A. Basinska. Visegrád countries' scientific productivity in the European context: A 10-year perspective using Web of Science and Scopus
358 -- 369Robyn Price, Yusuf Ozkan. Characteristics of Imperial College London's COVID-19 research outputs
370 -- 378Cary Moskovitz. Standardizing terminology for text recycling in research writing
379 -- 388Graham Kendall. Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers
389 -- 395Jan Higgins, Robert D. Steiner. Author preprint behaviour and non-compliance with journal preprint policies: One biomedical journal's experience
396 -- 406Kelsey Inouye, David S. Mills. Fear of the academic fake? Journal editorials and the amplification of the 'predatory publishing' discourse
407 -- 413Sefika Mertkan, Gulen Onurkan Aliusta, Nilgun Suphi. Knowledge production on predatory publishing: A systematic review
414 -- 428Binh Pham-Duc, Trung Tran, Hien-Thu-Thi Le, Nhi Thi Nguyen, Ha-Thi Cao, Tien Trung Nguyen. Research on Industry 4.0 and on key related technologies in Vietnam: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus
429 -- 441Dezhong Duan, Qifan Xia. Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis
442 -- 449Jonathan Roscoe. Opportunities for open access: Insights from the Wiley Practitioner Survey
450 -- 453Phil Hurst, Sarah Greaves. COVID-19 Rapid Review cross-publisher initiative: What we have learned and what we are going to do next
454 -- 456Sean C. Rife, Domenic Rosati, Joshua M. Nicholson. scite: The next generation of citations
457 -- 460Jiao Zhang. Did anthropause generate a research pause during the pandemic? The experiences of a non-medical journal
461 -- 467Sin Wang Chong. Improving peer-review by developing reviewers' feedback literacy
468 -- 473Tom Hill. Research4Life: Landscape and situation analysis: Review

Volume 34, Issue 2

82 -- 88Xiaoke Cao, Lei Lei 0002, Ju Wen. Promoting science with linguistic devices: A large-scale study of positive and negative words in academic writing
89 -- 104David S. Mills, Kelsey Inouye. Problematizing 'predatory publishing': A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences
105 -- 115Jing Wang, Willem Halffman, Hub A. E. Zwart. The Chinese scientific publication system: Specific features, specific challenges
116 -- 127Zhiqiang Zhang, Lei Zheng. Consumer community cognition, brand loyalty, and behaviour intentions within online publishing communities: An empirical study of Epubit in China
128 -- 136Adam Coates. How often are basic details of the research process mentioned in social science research papers?
137 -- 143Sumiko Asai. An analysis of revising article processing charges for open access journals between 2018 and 2020
144 -- 155Anna Severin, Joanna Chataway. Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions
156 -- 163Maria S. Plakhotnik. Communication clarity in calls for papers issued by journal special issues: First impressions matter
164 -- 174José Luis Ortega 0001. The relationship and incidence of three editorial notices in PubPeer: Errata, expressions of concern, and retractions
175 -- 186Thi Thu Ha Nguyen, Hiep-Hung Pham, Quan-Hoang Vuong, Quoc-Thai Cao, Viet-Hung Dinh, Dinh-Duc Nguyen. The adoption of international publishing within Vietnamese academia from 1986 to 2020: A review
187 -- 197Shelly M. Pranic, Mario Malicki, Stjepan Ljudevit Marusic, Bahar Mehmani, Ana Marusic. Is the quality of reviews reflected in editors' and authors' satisfaction with peer review? A cross-sectional study in 12 journals across four research fields
198 -- 215Jungwon Yoon, EunKyung Chung, Janet Schalk, Jihyun Kim 0002. Examination of data citation guidelines in style manuals and data repositories
216 -- 232Ángel Borrego, Lluís Anglada, Ernest Abadal. Transformative agreements: Do they pave the way to open access?
233 -- 240Ali Gazni, Fereshteh Didegah. Journal self-citation trends in 1975-2017 and the effect on journal impact and article citations
241 -- 252James L. Nuzzo. Preliminary evidence that letters to the editor are indexed inconsistently in PubMed and in exercise science and physical therapy journals: Implications and resolutions
253 -- 261Ivan A. Tarkhanov, Denis V. Fomin-Nilov, Michael V. Fomin. Crypto access: Is it possible to use cryptocurrencies in scholarly periodicals?
262 -- 271Jonathan J. Mallett, Debra L. Chin, Iris M. Rush, Justine R. Smith. The transition of ARVO journals to open access
272 -- 278Heather Staines. Mission alignment: University presses versus institutional visions
279 -- 281Reza BasirianJahromi, Amrollah Shamsi. Should we add social media account details to authors' affiliations?
282 -- 286Sam McLeod. Should authors cite sources suggested by peer reviewers? Six antidotes for handling potentially coercive reviewer citation suggestions
287 -- 289Tom Hill. The production, circulation, consumption, and ownership of scientific knowledge: Historical perspectives: Review

Volume 34, Issue 1

4 -- 5Lettie Y. Conrad. Defining resilience for our industry: Voices of adaptation and reinvention in scholarly publishing
6 -- 16Lisa Cuevas Shaw. From sensemaking to sensegiving: A discourse analysis of the scholarly communications community's public response to the global pandemic
17 -- 24Charles Watkinson. University presses and the impact of COVID-19
25 -- 29Josh Brown 0001, Phill Jones, Alice Meadows, Fiona Murphy. Building resilience through cooperation: Two case studies
30 -- 34Allyson Mower. Opportunities for eTextbook innovations and partnerships: A case study of the Marriott Library at the University of Utah
35 -- 42Violaine Iglesias 0001, Steven Rathgeb Smith, Dan Gibson. A lesson in resilience: The abrupt digital transformation of society conferences in 2020
43 -- 48Jeremy Brinton. The impact of COVID-19 on the UK publishing industry: Findings and opportunity
49 -- 56Jonathan J. Mallett. The resilience of scientific publication: From elite ancient academies to open access
57 -- 63Haseeb Md. Irfanullah. So, what does resilience mean for scholarly publishing?
64 -- 67Bill Kasdorf. Why we can be resilient: We have technology and open standards to thank
68 -- 70Niamh O'Connor. Publishing during a pandemic: Resilience and change
71 -- 75Helena Cousijn, Ginny Hendricks, Alice Meadows. Why openness makes research infrastructure resilient
76 -- 77. Thanking our reviewers 2020