Journal: Learned Publishing

Volume 35, Issue S1

688 -- 689Ben Denne, Nisha Doshi, Anthony Cond. University presses and societal challenges: Practical steps for change
690 -- 696Stacy Scott. The 'long and winding road' for digital accessibility
697 -- 703Huw Alexander. Are we there yet? The state of accessible publishing in 2022
704 -- 710Andri Johnston, William Pickett. Using DIMPACT to calculate the carbon impact of digital publishing at Cambridge University Press & Assessment
711 -- 715Chris Hart. Do you still need to make that trip?
716 -- 718Ben Denne, Cate Giddens, Bathsheba Viola Lockwood Brook. Company culture and employee retention: Session takeaways

Volume 35, Issue 4

432 -- 440Pippa Smart. The past, present and future of publishing: Observations to celebrate ALPSP's 50th year
441 -- 447Jaume Sureda-Negre, Aina Calvo-Sastre, Rubén Comas-Forgas. Predatory journals and publishers: Characteristics and impact of academic spam to researchers in educational sciences
448 -- 453Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Yves Fassin. Reflection on the Springer Nature initial public offering attempts in an evolving academic publishing market
454 -- 466Marie-Dominique Heusse, Guillaume Cabanac. ORCID growth and field-wise dynamics of adoption: A case study of the Toulouse scientific area
467 -- 480Lin Zhang 0004, Yahui Wei, Gunnar Sivertsen, Ying Huang 0002. The motivations and criteria behind China's list of questionable journals
481 -- 488Jonathan Roscoe. The need for accelerated change in diversity, equity and inclusion in publishing and learned societies
489 -- 498Francisco Segado-Boj, Juan José Prieto-Gutierrez, Juan Martin-Quevedo. Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits
499 -- 515Serhii Nazarovets. Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus-delisted titles
516 -- 528Tracey Elliott, Bisma Fazeen, Asfawossen Asrat, Ana Maria Cetto, Stefan Eriksson, Lai-Meng Looi, Diane Negra. Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers
529 -- 538Stephen J. Chapman, Fahima Dossa, E. Joline de Groof, Celia Keane, Gabrielle H. van Ramshorst, Neil J. Smart. The AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal tool and editorial decision-making for systematic reviews: Retrospective, bibliometric study
539 -- 562Kamila Augustyn. An analysis of publishing studies journals: An insight into the structure of the field based on publications
563 -- 573Yulia V. Sevryugina, Andrew J. Dicks. Publication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect?
574 -- 584Hassan Nejadghanbar, Guangwei Hu. Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals
585 -- 597Xiaohua Jiang, YaBing Shi. Editorial bias in top-tier education journals: Factors influencing publishable scholarship in China
598 -- 604Tove Faber Frandsen. Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles
605 -- 616David Nicholas, Eti Herman, David J. Clark, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez Bravo, Abdullah Abrizah, Anthony Watkinson, Jie Xu 0005, David Sims, Galina Serbina, Marzena Swigon, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard. Choosing the 'right' journal for publication: Perceptions and practices of pandemic-era early career researchers
617 -- 624Majid Nabavi. An analysis of journalism articles achieving high Altmetric attention scores
625 -- 639Ningyuan Song, Jing Liu, Xiaoguang Wang, Qingyu Duan, Mengjuan Weng. Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E-books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks
640 -- 649Luka Ursic, Danijel Gudelj, Vicko Tomic, Matko Marusic, Ana Marusic. Analysing overlay journals: The state-of-the-art in 2021 and possible perspectives
650 -- 657T. Scott Plutchak, H. Frederick Dylla, Crispin Taylor, John Vaughn. Public access policy in the United States: Impact of the Scholarly Publishing Roundtable
658 -- 670Maryna Nazarovets, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva. Scientific publishing sanctions in response to the Russo-Ukrainian war
671 -- 673Nick Rushby. A parallel universe: Challenges for an international journal based in Russia
674 -- 677Jean Iwaz. To my reviewers, with respect and gratitude: Guidelines from an author
678 -- 681William H. Walters. Scholarly journals are sometimes regarded as substitutes even though each provides unique content
682 -- 683. Award

Volume 35, Issue 3

304 -- 305Sophie Robinson. Guest editorial: An early career editor's perspective on the themed collection
306 -- 307Max Steuer, Rafael Plancarte-Escobar. Towards improved understanding of students and junior scholars as authors, reviewers, editors and leaders in scholarly publishing
308 -- 320Xiaoguang Wang, Lingying Xia, Qingyu Duan. The barriers and informational needs of students and junior researchers when reading scientific papers
321 -- 331Kari A. Mattison, Andrea R. Merchak, Scott T. Wieman, Stephanie Zimmer, Sarah C. Fankhauser. Engaging young scholars in science through publication: A survey analysis of published middle and high school authors
332 -- 340Maria S. Plakhotnik. Co-authoring with undergraduate students: An emerging process from the semi-periphery of the world of science
341 -- 349Daniel Stockemer, Theresa Reidy, Antonia Teodoro, Guy Gerba. Student publishing in peer reviewed journals: Evidence from the International Political Science Review
350 -- 360Yu Wang, Liangbin Zhao, Yuanxiang Zeng, Mengyao Cheng. Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China
361 -- 366Gregory Stiles, Janina Pescinski, Katharine Petrich, Anastasia Ufimtseva. For early-career researchers by early-career researchers: The GPNG model for advancing, promoting and supporting innovative research
367 -- 375Aishwarya Pagedar, Sanskriti Sanghi, Shivangi Gangwar. Nurturing an 'ethic of collaboration': Dispatches from a case study on Jindal Global Law Review
376 -- 384Wilson Lui. Advancing the student-oriented model of academic publishing: The case of legal studies in Hong Kong
385 -- 392Rafael Plancarte-Escobar, Max Steuer. Junior journals in politics and international relations: Potential and challenges
393 -- 399Claire E. Otero, Victoria Osinski, Kari A. Mattison. The untapped potential of early career researchers in academic publishing: Lessons learned from the Journal of Emerging Investigators model
400 -- 404Ales Karmazin. Editing a journal at the semiperiphery: Ambivalence of juniority and meaningfulness of publishing
405 -- 412Gary S. McDowell, Sarah Fankhauser, Daniela Saderi, Meena Balgopal, Rebeccah S. Lijek. Use of preprint peer review to educate and enculturate science undergraduates
413 -- 417Ryan S. C. Wong, Kayla M. Martensen. Let's start talking: A reflective essay on minority students' experiences in academic spaces, publishing, and journal involvement
418 -- 422Quan-Hoang Vuong. The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing
423 -- 427Phillip Nelson, Marina G. Petrova. Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship

Volume 35, Issue 2

92 -- 104Guijie Zhang, Fangfang Wei, Peixin Wang, Yikai Liang. Investigating academic conference publications from provincial administrative regions in the mainland of China
105 -- 117Jirí Kratochvíl, Helga Abrahámová, Marta Fialová, Martina Stodulková. Citation rules through the eyes of biomedical journal editors
118 -- 129Ramón A. Feenstra, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar. Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma
130 -- 139Henk F. Moed, Carmen López-Illescas, Vicente P. Guerrero Bote, Félix de Moya Anegón. Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers
140 -- 148Adam Coates. Academic journals' usernames and the threat of fraudulent accounts on social media
149 -- 162Yan Lei. Is a journal's ranking related to the reviewer's academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons)
163 -- 174Bei Zhang, Jing Sun, Huangqun Zhang, Chengting Xu. Can promotion on WeChat official accounts improve scholarly journals' academic impact? A micro-level correlation comparison study
175 -- 186Moumita Koley, Kanchan Lala. Are journal archiving and embargo policies impeding the success of India's open access policy?
187 -- 197Mahdi Khelfaoui, Yves Gingras. Expanding Nature: Product line and brand extensions of a scientific journal
198 -- 208Hamid R. Jamali, Simon Wakeling, Alireza Abbasi. Scholarly journal publishing in Australia
209 -- 218Mei Zhang. University press selection of e-book vendors for US academic libraries: Why work with X but not Y?
219 -- 228Hamid R. Jamali, Simon Wakeling, Alireza Abbasi. Why do journals discontinue? A study of Australian ceased journals
229 -- 240Gert Helgesson, Igor Radun, Jenni Radun, Gustav Nilsonne. Editors publishing in their own journals: A systematic review of prevalence and a discussion of normative aspects
241 -- 252Ruth Fairclough, Mike Thelwall. Questionnaires mentioned in academic research 1996-2019: Rapid increase but declining citation impact
253 -- 260Lili Yang, Siyun Xu, Jufang Shao, Panzhi Wang, Xianjun Wang, Qi Qi, Rongwang Yang. Declaration of conflict of interest in medical researchers: A cross-sectional study from China
261 -- 270Shaoxiong (Brian) Xu, Guangwei Hu. Non-author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross-disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction
271 -- 284Carlo Galli, Maria Teresa Colangelo, Stefano Guizzardi. Linguistic changes in the transition from summaries to abstracts: The case of the Journal of Experimental Medicine
285 -- 287Anthony F. Jorm. Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers
288 -- 291Jean-Pierre V. M. Hérubel. For alma mater: Publishing institutional histories of higher education and university presses: Purposes, genre and scholarly value
292 -- 299Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Quan-Hoang Vuong. Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness

Volume 35, Issue 1

4 -- 6Lettie Y. Conrad, Richard Delahunty, Wendy Ding. The promise and the future of research data sharing
7 -- 15Qingyu Duan, Xiaoguang Wang, Ningyuan Song. Reuse-oriented data publishing: How to make the shared research data friendlier for researchers
16 -- 29Marie-Emilia Herbet, Jérémie Léonard, Maria Grazia Santangelo, Lucie Albaret. Dissimulate or disseminate? A survey on the fate of negative results
30 -- 45Yu Wang, Beibei Chen, Liangbin Zhao, Yuanxiang Zeng. Research data policies of journals in the Chinese Science Citation Database based on the language, publisher, discipline, access model and metrics
46 -- 55Chengzan Li, Yuanchun Zhou, Xiaohuan Zheng, Zeyu Zhang, Lulu Jiang, Zongwen Li, Pengyao Wang, Jianhui Li, Songyuan Xu, Zhanjie Wang. Tracing the footsteps of open research data in China
56 -- 66Matthew Cannon, Andrew Kelly, Chris Freeman. Implementing an Open & FAIR data sharing policy - A case study in the earth and environmental sciences
67 -- 70Eefke Smit, Joris van Rossum. STM's Research Data Year: Results, lessons learnt, and next steps
71 -- 74Aki MacFarlane. The importance of effective data sharing and reuse to funders and others supporting research
75 -- 80Helena Cousijn, Ted Habermann, Elizabeth Krznarich, Alice Meadows. Beyond data: Sharing related research outputs to make data reusable
81 -- 85Catriona Manville, Grace Melvin. The importance of transparency and openness in research data to drive patient benefit - Examples from the United Kingdom
86 -- 87. Thanking our reviewers 2021