Journal: Quant. Sci. Stud.

Volume 1, Issue 4

1349 -- 1380Giovanni Colavizza. COVID-19 research in Wikipedia
1381 -- 1395Mike Thelwall. Coronavirus research before 2020 is more relevant than ever, especially when interpreted for COVID-19
1396 -- 1428Janne Pölönen, Mikael Laakso, Raf Guns, Emanuel Kulczycki, Gunnar Sivertsen. Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers
1429 -- 1450Anthony J. Olejniczak, Molly J. Wilson. Who's writing open access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States
1451 -- 1467Erjia Yan, Yongjun Zhu, Jiangen He. Analyzing academic mobility of U.S. professors based on ORCID data and the Carnegie Classification
1468 -- 1492Helena Mihaljevic, Lucía Santamaría. Authorship in top-ranked mathematical and physical journals: Role of gender on self-perceptions and bibliographic evidence
1493 -- 1509Christian Zingg, Vahan Nanumyan, Frank Schweitzer. Citations driven by social connections? A multi-layer representation of coauthorship networks
1510 -- 1528Alexander Tekles, Lutz Bornmann. Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches
1529 -- 1552René van Bevern, Christian Komusiewicz, Hendrik Molter, Rolf Niedermeier, Manuel Sorge, Toby Walsh. h-Index manipulation by undoing merges
1553 -- 1569Lutz Bornmann. How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles
1570 -- 1585Kevin W. Boyack, Richard Klavans. A comparison of large-scale science models based on textual, direct citation and hybrid relatedness
1586 -- 1600Gérard Chevalier, Christine Chomienne, Nicolas Guetta Jeanrenaud, Julia Lane, Matthew Ross. A new approach for estimating research impact: An application to French cancer research
1601 -- 1637Mikaël Héroux-Vaillancourt, Catherine Beaudry, Constant Rietsch. Using web content analysis to create innovation indicators - What do we really measure?
1638 -- 1652Mike Thelwall. Pot, kettle: Nonliteral titles aren't (natural) science
1653 -- 0. Erratum

Volume 1, Issue 3

918 -- 926Loet Leydesdorff, Ismael Ràfols, Stasa Milojevic. Bridging the divide between qualitative and quantitative science studies
927 -- 929Geoffrey C. Bowker. Numbers or no numbers in science studies
930 -- 944Donghyun Kang, James Evans. Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science
945 -- 958Harriet Zuckerman. Is "the time ripe" for quantitative research on misconduct in science?
959 -- 968Yong Zhao, Jian Du, Yishan Wu. The impact of J. D. Bernal's thoughts in the science of science upon China: Implications for today's quantitative studies of science
969 -- 982Diana Hicks, Kimberley R. Isett. Powerful numbers: Exemplary quantitative studies of science that had policy impact
983 -- 992Thomas Heinze, Arlette Jappe. Quantitative science studies should be framed with middle-range theories and concepts from the social sciences
993 -- 1000Christine L. Borgman. Whose text, whose mining, and to whose benefit?
1001 -- 1006Mary Frank Fox. Gender, science, and academic rank: Key issues and approaches
1007 -- 1016Koen Frenken. Geography of scientific knowledge: A proximity approach
1017 -- 1024Alberto Cambrosio, Jean-Philippe Cointet, Alexandre Hannud Abdo. Beyond networks: Aligning qualitative and computational science studies
1025 -- 1040Henry Small. Past as prologue: Approaches to the study of confirmation in science
1041 -- 1055Noortje Marres, Sarah de Rijcke. From indicators to indicating interdisciplinarity: A participatory mapping methodology for research communities in-the-making
1056 -- 1067Serge P. J. M. Horbach. Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19
1068 -- 1091Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall. COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts
1092 -- 1108Caroline S. Armitage, Marta Lorenz, Susanne Mikki. Mapping scholarly publications related to the Sustainable Development Goals: Do independent bibliometric approaches get the same results?
1109 -- 1135Friso Selten, Cameron Neylon, Chun-Kai Huang 0001, Paul Groth. A longitudinal analysis of university rankings
1136 -- 1158Iris Wanzenböck, Rafael Lata, Doga Ince. Proposal success in Horizon 2020: A study of the influence of consortium characteristics
1159 -- 1181Emil Bargmann Madsen, Kaare Aagaard. Concentration of Danish research funding on individual researchers and research topics: Patterns and potential drivers
1182 -- 1202Jonathan Adams 0001, Gordon Rogers, Warren Smart, Martin Szomszor. Longitudinal variation in national research publication portfolios: Steps required to index balance and evenness
1203 -- 1222Mignon Wuestman, Jarno Hoekman, Koen Frenken. A typology of scientific breakthroughs
1223 -- 1241Sitaram Devarakonda, James R. Bradley, Dmitriy Korobskiy, Tandy J. Warnow, George Chacko. Frequently cocited publications: Features and kinetics
1242 -- 1259Lutz Bornmann, Sitaram Devarakonda, Alexander Tekles, George Chacko. Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers
1260 -- 1282Mike Thelwall, Amalia Más-Bleda. A gender equality paradox in academic publishing: Countries with a higher proportion of female first-authored journal articles have larger first-author gender disparities between fields
1283 -- 1297Mike Thelwall, Pardeep Sud. Greater female first author citation advantages do not associate with reduced or reducing gender disparities in academia
1298 -- 1308Filipi Nascimento Silva, Aditya Tandon, Diego Raphael Amancio, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer, Stasa Milojevic, Santo Fortunato. Recency predicts bursts in the evolution of author citations
1309 -- 1320Mark C. Wilson, Zhou Tang. Noncumulative measures of researcher citation impact
1321 -- 1333Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Giovanni Felici. Informed peer review for publication assessments: Are improved impact measures worth the hassle?
1334 -- 1348Mike Thelwall, Ruth Fairclough. All downhill from the PhD? The typical impact trajectory of U.S. academic careers

Volume 1, Issue 2

445 -- 478Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang, Cameron Neylon, Chloe Brookes-Kenworthy, Richard Hosking, Lucy Montgomery, Katie Wilson, Alkim Ozaygen. Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings
479 -- 504Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall. Google Books, Scopus, Microsoft Academic, and Mendeley for impact assessment of doctoral dissertations: A multidisciplinary analysis of the UK
505 -- 524Gustaf Nelhans, Theo Bodin. Methodological considerations for identifying questionable publishing in a national context: The case of Swedish Higher Education Institutions
525 -- 550Tobias Weber, Dieter Kranzlmüller, Michael Fromm, Nelson Tavares de Sousa. Using supervised learning to classify metadata of research data by field of study
551 -- 564Paul Donner. A validation of coauthorship credit models with empirical data from the contributions of PhD candidates
565 -- 581Valeria Aman. Transfer of knowledge through international scientific mobility: Introduction of a network-based bibliometric approach to study different knowledge types
582 -- 598Adèle Paul-Hus, Philippe Mongeon, Maxime B. Sainte-Marie, Vincent Larivière. Who are the acknowledgees? An analysis of gender and academic status
599 -- 617Mike Thelwall. Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996-2014
618 -- 638Nicholas Fraser, Fakhri Momeni, Philipp Mayr 0001, Isabella Peters. The relationship between bioRxiv preprints, citations and altmetrics
639 -- 663Manolis Antonoyiannakis. Impact factor volatility due to a single paper: A comprehensive analysis
664 -- 674Erjia Yan, Zheng Chen 0010, Kai Li 0010. The relationship between journal citation impact and citation sentiment: A study of 32 million citances in PubMed Central
675 -- 690Charles Crothers, Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild. Citation concept analysis (CCA) of Robert K. Merton's book Social Theory and Social Structure: How often are certain concepts from the book cited in subsequent publications?
691 -- 713Ludo Waltman, Kevin W. Boyack, Giovanni Colavizza, Nees Jan van Eck. A principled methodology for comparing relatedness measures for clustering publications
714 -- 729Per Ahlgren, Yunwei Chen, Cristian Colliander, Nees Jan van Eck. Enhancing direct citations: A comparison of relatedness measures for community detection in a large set of PubMed publications
730 -- 748Mike Thelwall, Amalia Más-Bleda. How common are explicit research questions in journal articles?
749 -- 770Asura Enkhbayar, Stefanie Haustein, Germana Barata, Juan Pablo Alperin. How much research shared on Facebook happens outside of public pages and groups? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers
771 -- 791Rodrigo Costas, Philippe Mongeon, Márcia Ferreira, Jeroen van Honk, Thomas Franssen. Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter
792 -- 809Omar Kassab, Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild. Can altmetrics reflect societal impact considerations?: Exploring the potential of altmetrics in the context of a sustainability science research center
810 -- 823Eliza Harrison, Paige Martin, Didi Surian, Adam G. Dunn. Recommending research articles to consumers of online vaccination information
824 -- 848Lokman I. Meho. Highly prestigious international academic awards and their impact on university rankings
849 -- 871Andreas Kjær Stage, Kaare Aagaard. National policies as drivers of organizational change in universities: A string of reinforcing reforms
872 -- 893Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro, Ricardo Brito. Might Europe one day again be a global scientific powerhouse? Analysis of ERC publications suggests it will not be possible without changes in research policy
894 -- 917Emanuele Rabosio, Lorenzo Righetto, Alessandro Spelta, Fabio Pammolli. Connected from the outside: The role of U.S. regions in promoting the integration of the European research system

Volume 1, Issue 1

1 -- 3Ludo Waltman, Vincent Larivière, Stasa Milojevic, Cassidy R. Sugimoto. Opening science: The rebirth of a scholarly journal
4 -- 5Mike Thelwall. In memoriam Judit Bar-Ilan
6 -- 27Nina Schönfelder. Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model?
28 -- 59Kyle Siler, Koen Frenken. The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing
60 -- 93Hugo Horta, João M. Santos. The Multidimensional Research Agendas Inventory - Revised (MDRAI-R): Factors shaping researchers' research agendas in all fields of knowledge
94 -- 116Dominik P. Heinisch, Johannes König 0001, Anne Otto. A supervised machine learning approach to trace doctorate recipients' employment trajectories
117 -- 149Kaare Aagaard, Alexander Kladakis, Mathias Wullum Nielsen. Concentration or dispersal of research funding?
150 -- 170Paul Donner, Christine Rimmert, Nees Jan van Eck. Comparing institutional-level bibliometric research performance indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems
171 -- 182Lutz Bornmann. Bibliometrics-based decision trees (BBDTs) based on bibliometrics-based heuristics (BBHs): Visualized guidelines for the use of bibliometrics in research evaluation
183 -- 206Stasa Milojevic. Practical method to reclassify Web of Science articles into unique subject categories and broad disciplines
207 -- 238Peter Sjögårde, Per Ahlgren. Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of specialties
239 -- 263Qi Wang, Jesper Wiborg Schneider. Consistency and validity of interdisciplinarity measures
264 -- 276James Bradley, Sitaram Devarakonda, Avon Davey, Dmitriy Korobskiy, Siyu Liu, Djamil Lakhdar-Hamina, Tandy J. Warnow, George Chacko. Co-citations in context: Disciplinary heterogeneity is relevant
277 -- 289Alberto Baccini, Lucio Barabesi, Mahdi Khelfaoui, Yves Gingras. Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations
290 -- 302Mike Thelwall. Large publishing consortia produce higher citation impact research but coauthor contributions are hard to evaluate
303 -- 319Maxime B. Sainte-Marie, Philippe Mongeon, Vincent Larivière. On the topicality and research impact of special issues
320 -- 330Leo Egghe, Ronald Rousseau 0001. h-Type indices, partial sums and the majorization order
331 -- 346Lutz Bornmann, Christian Ganser, Alexander Tekles, Loet Leydesdorff. α-index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? The introduction of agent-based simulations into scientometrics
347 -- 359Mike Thelwall. Mendeley reader counts for US computer science conference papers and journal articles
360 -- 362Ludo Waltman, Vincent Larivière. Special issue on bibliographic data sources
363 -- 376Caroline Birkle, David A. Pendlebury, Joshua Schnell, Jonathan Adams. Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity
377 -- 386Jeroen Baas, Michiel Schotten, Andrew M. Plume, Grégoire Côté, Reza Karimi. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies
387 -- 395Christian Herzog 0005, Daniel Hook, Stacy R. Konkiel. Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data
396 -- 413Kuansan Wang, Zhihong Shen, Chiyuan Huang, Chieh-Han Wu, Yuxiao Dong, Anshul Kanakia. Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough
414 -- 427Ginny Hendricks, Dominika Tkaczyk, Jennifer Lin, Patricia Feeney. Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata
428 -- 444Silvio Peroni, David M. Shotton. OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarship