Journal: Science and Engineering Ethics

Volume 16, Issue 4

631 -- 637Joe Giffels, Sara H. Vollmer, Stephanie J. Bird. Editors Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data
669 -- 673Dale J. Benos, Sara H. Vollmer. Generalizing on Best Practices in Image Processing: A Model for Promoting Research Integrity - Commentary on: Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images
675 -- 691Sara H. Vollmer, George Howard. Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials
693 -- 696Stephanie J. Bird. Responsible Research: What is Expected? - Commentary on: Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials
763 -- 767C. K. Gunsalus. Best Practices in Communicating Best Practices - Commentary on: Developing and Communicating Responsible Data Management Policies to Trainees and Colleagues
783 -- 799Beth A. Fischer, Michael J. Zigmond. The Essential Nature of Sharing in Science
801 -- 803Joe Giffels. Sharing Data is a Shared Responsibility - Commentary on: The Essential Nature of Sharing in Science

Volume 16, Issue 3

479 -- 487Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara. Uncertainties
535 -- 571Byron Newberry. Katrina: Macro-Ethical Issues for Engineers
573 -- 589Bradley J. Brummel, C. K. Gunsalus, Kerri L. Anderson, Michael C. Loui. Development of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research
611 -- 628William J. Frey. Teaching Virtue: Pedagogical Implications of Moral Psychology
629 -- 630Ilse Oosterlaken. Ibo van de Poel and David E. Goldberg (eds): Philosophy and Engineering. An Emerging Agenda - Springer, The Netherlands, 2009, ISBN 978-90-481-2803-7/e-ISBN 978-90-481-2804-4

Volume 16, Issue 2

221 -- 249Neelke Doorn. A Rawlsian Approach to Distribute Responsibilities in Networks
251 -- 261Anne Victoria Neale, Rhonda K. Dailey, Judith Abrams. Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct
303 -- 323Eleni Kosta, Olli Pitkänen, Marketta Niemelä, Eija Kaasinen. Mobile-Centric Ambient Intelligence in Health- and Homecare - Anticipating Ethical and Legal Challenges
325 -- 353Cameron Gordon, Alan Zimmerman. Fair Shares: A Preliminary Framework and Case Analyzing the Ethics of Offshoring
371 -- 385Mark Coeckelbergh. Engineering Good: How Engineering Metaphors Help us to Understand the Moral Life and Change Society
387 -- 407Jason Borenstein, Matthew J. Drake, Robert Kirkman, Julie L. Swann. The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment
409 -- 413Luisa María Gil-Martín, Enrique Hernández-Montes, Armando Segura-Naya. A New Experience: The Course of Ethics in Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Granada
423 -- 426Gregory J. Morgan. Heather Douglas: Is Science Value-Free? (Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal)

Volume 16, Issue 1

1 -- 6Raymond E. Spier. "Dual Use" and "Intentionality": Seeking to Prevent the Manifestation of Deliberately Harmful Objectives
85 -- 97David Friedman, Bracha Rager-Zisman, Eitan Bibi, Alex Keynan. The Bioterrorism Threat and Dual-use Biotechnological Research: An Israeli Perspective
99 -- 110Marek Czarkowski. The Dilemma of Dual Use Biological Research: Polish Perspective
111 -- 118John Forge. A Note on the Definition of "Dual Use"
119 -- 133David Koepsell. On Genies and Bottles: Scientists' Moral Responsibility and Dangerous Technology R&D
135 -- 145Thomas A. Cavanaugh. Temporal Indiscriminateness: The Case of Cluster Bombs
169 -- 174Dimitrios Adamis, Adrian Treloar, Finbarr C. Martin, Alastair J. D. Macdonald. Ethical Research in Delirium: Arguments for Including Decisionally Incapacitated Subjects
175 -- 184Lawrence Souder. A Rhetorical Analysis of Apologies for Scientific Misconduct: Do They Really Mean It?
201 -- 215Golnaz Hashemian, Michael C. Loui. Can Instruction in Engineering Ethics Change Students Feelings about Professional Responsibility?
217 -- 219Neelke Doorn. Paul Sollie and Marcus Düwell (eds): Evaluating New Technologies. Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments