Table of Contents

• Identification of Legislative ErrorsMichal Araszkiewicz, Enrico Francesconi, Tomasz Zurek. 2-11 [doi]
• ANGELIC II: An Improved Methodology for Representing Legal Domain KnowledgeKatie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 12-21 [doi]
• Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning?Andrew Blair-Stanek, Nils Holzenberger, Benjamin Van Durme. 22-31 [doi]
• Analogical Reasoning, Generalization, and Rule Learning for Common Law ReasoningJoseph A. Blass, Kenneth D. Forbus. 32-41 [doi]
• MultiLegalSBD: A Multilingual Legal Sentence Boundary Detection DatasetTobias Brugger, Matthias Stürmer, Joel Niklaus. 42-51 [doi]
• Reasoning with hierarchies of open-textured predicatesIlaria Canavotto, John F. Horty. 52-61 [doi]
• Who really wrote Martin v. Hunter's Lessee?: Applying a machine learning ensemble to uncover a Chief Justice's unethical behaviorSeth J. Chandler, Emily A. Muenster, Daniel Lichtblau. 62-70 [doi]
• EQUALS: A Real-world Dataset for Legal Question Answering via Reading Chinese LawsAndong Chen, Feng Yao, Xinyan Zhao, Yating Zhang, Changlong Sun, Yun Liu, Weixing Shen. 71-80 [doi]
• Do agents dream of abiding by the rules?: Learning norms via behavioral exploration and sparse human supervisionPeter Fratric, Mostafa Mohajeri Parizi, Giovanni Sileno, Tom M. van Engers, Sander Klous. 81-90 [doi]
• Deontic Ambiguities in Legal ReasoningGuido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo. 91-100 [doi]
• Automatic Identification and Empirical Analysis of Legally Relevant FactorsMorgan A. Gray, Jaromír Savelka, Wesley M. Oliver, Kevin D. Ashley. 101-110 [doi]
• The Perfect Victim: Computational Analysis of Judicial Attitudes towards Victims of Sexual ViolenceEliya Habba, Renana Keydar, Dan Bareket, Gabriel Stanovsky. 111-120 [doi]
• Computational AccountabilityJoris Hulstijn. 121-130 [doi]
• Confidence Sequences for Evaluating One-Phase Technology-Assisted ReviewDavid D. Lewis, Lenora Gray, Mark Noel. 131-140 [doi]
• Don't Use a Cannon to Kill a Fly: An Efficient Cascading Pipeline for Long DocumentsZehua Li, Neel Guha, Julian Nyarko. 141-147 [doi]
• Legal Holding Extraction from Italian Case Documents using Italian-LEGAL-BERT Text SummarizationDaniele Licari, Praveen Bushipaka, Gabriele Marino, Giovanni Comandé, Tommaso Cucinotta. 148-156 [doi]
• Argumentation Schemes for Legal Presumption of CausalityRuta Liepina, Adam Z. Wyner, Giovanni Sartor, Francesca Lagioia. 157-166 [doi]
• Combining a Legal Knowledge Model with Machine Learning for Reasoning with Legal CasesJack Mumford, Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 167-176 [doi]
• Justification, stability and relevance for case-based reasoning with incomplete focus casesDaphne Odekerken, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken. 177-186 [doi]
• Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian LawShounak Paul, Arpan Mandal, Pawan Goyal 0002, Saptarshi Ghosh 0001. 187-196 [doi]
• Extraction and Classification of Statute Facets using Few-shot LearningSachin Pawar, Basit Ali, Girish K. Palshikar, Ramandeep Singh, Dhirendra Singh. 197-206 [doi]
• Model- and data-agnostic justifications with A Fortiori Case-Based ArgumentationJoeri G. T. Peters, Floris J. Bex, Henry Prakken. 207-216 [doi]
• On predicting and explaining asylum adjudicationSebastiano Antonio Piccolo, Panagiota Katsikouli, Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, Tijs Slaats. 217-226 [doi]
• A Formal Framework for Combining Legal Reasoning MethodsHenry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor. 227-236 [doi]
• Gender Disparities in Child Custody Sentencing in Spain: a Data Driven AnalysisJúlia Riera, David Solans, Marzieh Karimi-Haghighi, Carlos Castillo 0001, Caterina Calsamiglia. 237-246 [doi]
• Argumentation Structure Prediction in CJEU Decisions on Fiscal State AidPiera Santin, Giulia Grundler, Andrea Galassi, Federico Galli, Francesca Lagioia, Elena Palmieri, Federico Ruggeri, Giovanni Sartor, Paolo Torroni. 247-256 [doi]
• Uncovering Trauma in Genocide Tribunals: An NLP Approach Using the Genocide Transcript CorpusMiriam Schirmer, Isaac Misael Olguín Nolasco, Edoardo Mosca, Shanshan Xu, Jürgen Pfeffer. 257-266 [doi]
• Computable Contracts by Extracting Obligation Logic GraphsSergio Servantez, Nedim Lipka, Alexa F. Siu, Milan Aggarwal, Balaji Krishnamurthy, Aparna Garimella, Kristian J. Hammond, Rajiv Jain. 267-276 [doi]
• No Labels?: No Problem! Experiments with active learning strategies for multi-class classification in imbalanced low-resource settingsEmiel Steegh, Giovanni Sileno. 277-286 [doi]
• Beyond Readability with RateMyPDF: A Combined Rule-based and Machine Learning Approach to Improving Court FormsQuinten Steenhuis, Bryce Willey, David Colarusso. 287-296 [doi]
• Automated Anonymization of Court Decisions: Facilitating the Publication of Court Decisions through Algorithmic SystemsKalliopi Terzidou. 297-305 [doi]
• Rebuilding 'ethics' to govern AI: How to re-set the boundaries for the legal sector?Mehmet Bilal Ünver. 306-315 [doi]
• The Dutch Law as a Semantic Role Labeling DatasetRomy A. N. van Drie, Maaike H. T. de Boer, Roos M. Bakker, Ioannis Tolios, Daan Vos. 316-322 [doi]
• Using Agent-Based Simulations to Evaluate Bayesian Networks for Criminal ScenariosLudi van Leeuwen, Bart Verheij, Rineke Verbrugge, Silja Renooij. 323-332 [doi]
• Hierarchical Precedential ConstraintWijnand van Woerkom, Davide Grossi, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij. 333-342 [doi]
• A Quantitative Evaluation of Trademark Search Engines' Performances through Large-Scale Statistical AnalysisThomas Vandamme, Julien Cabay, Olivier Debeir. 343-350 [doi]
• JusticeBot: A Methodology for Building Augmented Intelligence Tools for Laypeople to Increase Access to JusticeHannes Westermann, Karim Benyekhlef. 351-360 [doi]
• Multi-agent logic for reasoning about duties and powers in private lawTianwen Xu, Fengkui Ju. 361-370 [doi]
• Argument Mining with Graph Representation LearningGechuan Zhang, Paul Nulty, David Lillis. 371-380 [doi]
• On the Semantic Difference of Judicial and Standard LanguageGregor Behnke, Niklas Wais. 382-386 [doi]
• Whatever Happened to Hypotheticals?Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 387-391 [doi]
• A Dataset of German Legal Reference AnnotationsHarshil Darji, Jelena Mitrovic, Michael Granitzer. 392-396 [doi]
• "What's wrong with this product?": Detection of product safety issues based on information consumers share onlineMax Fuchs, Amit Jadhav, Advaith Jaishankar, Caroline Cauffman, Gerasimos Spanakis. 397-401 [doi]
• Image Analysis Approach to Trademark Congestion and DepletionAmit Haim, Aniket Kesari. 402-406 [doi]
• Binding Language in Administrative Guidance DocumentsAmit Haim. 407-411 [doi]
• sustain.AI: a Recommender System to analyze Sustainability ReportsLars Hillebrand, Maren Pielka, David Leonhard, Tobias Deußer, Tim Dilmaghani Khameneh, Bernd Kliem, Rüdiger Loitz, Milad Morad, Christian Temath, Thiago Bell, Robin Stenzel, Rafet Sifa. 412-416 [doi]
• Legal Syllogism Prompting: Teaching Large Language Models for Legal Judgment PredictionCong Jiang, Xiaolei Yang. 417-421 [doi]
• LeArNER: Few-shot Legal Argument Named Entity RecognitionShao-Man Lee, Yu-Hsiang Tan, Han-Ting Yu. 422-426 [doi]
• Conceptual Questions in Developing Expert-Annotated DataMegan Ma, Brandon Waldon, Julian Nyarko. 427-431 [doi]
• On Normative Arrows and Comparing Tax Automation SystemsPaulus N. Meessen. 432-436 [doi]
• Keyword-based Augmentation Method to Enhance Abstractive Summarization for Legal DocumentsHuyen Nguyen, Junhua Ding. 437-441 [doi]
• Effects of XAI on Legal ProcessAileen Nielsen, Stavroula Skylaki, Milda Norkute, Alexander Stremitzer. 442-446 [doi]
• Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal TextsJaromír Savelka. 447-451 [doi]
• Analysing the Resourcefulness of the Paragraph for Precedence RetrievalBhoomeendra Singh Sisodiya, Narendra Babu Unnam, P. Krishna Reddy, Apala Das, K. V. K. Santhy, V. Balakista Reddy. 452-456 [doi]
• On evaluating legal summaries with ROUGEBianca Steffes, Piotr Rataj, Luise Burger, Lukas Roth. 457-461 [doi]
• Improving Translation of Case Descriptions into Logical Fact Formulas using LegalCaseNERMay Myo Zin, Ha-Thanh Nguyen, Ken Satoh, Saku Sugawara, Fumihito Nishino. 462-466 [doi]
• Applying NLLP and ML to Predict Damages as a Remedy for Contract BreachFrank Giaoui, Luv Aggarwal, Diego Lobo, Joan Gondolo, Philippe Lachkeur, Satvik Jain. 468-469 [doi]
• Summary of the Competition on Legal Information, Extraction/Entailment (COLIEE) 2023Randy Goebel, Yoshinobu Kano, Mi-Young Kim, Juliano Rabelo 0001, Ken Satoh, Masaharu Yoshioka. 472-480 [doi]