Table of Contents

• Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tumour Angiogenesis with Contrast-Enhanced Breast TomosynthesisMelissa L. Hill, Kela Liu, James G. Mainprize, Ronald B. Levitin, Rushin Shojaii, Martin J. Yaffe. 1-8 [doi]
• The Effect of Amorphous Selenium Thickness on Imaging Performance of Contrast Enhanced Digital Breast TomosynthesisYue-Houng Hu, David A. Scaduto, Wei Zhao. 9-16 [doi]
• Contrast Optimization in Clinical Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography ImagesJuan-Pablo Cruz-Bastida, Iván Rosado-Méndez, Héctor Pérez-Ponce, Yolanda Villaseñor, Héctor A. Galván, Flavio E. Trujillo-Zamudio, Luis Benítez-Bribiesca, María-Ester Brandan. 17-23 [doi]
• Determination of System Geometrical Parameters and Consistency between Scans for Contrast-Enhanced Digital Breast TomosynthesisDavid A. Scaduto, Wei Zhao. 24-31 [doi]
• Initial Experience with Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Characterization of Breast CancerSara Gavenonis, Kristen Lau, Roshan Karunamuni, Yiheng Zhang, Baorui Ren, Chris Ruth, Andrew D. A. Maidment. 32-39 [doi]
• Mammographic Segmentation and Risk Classification Using a Novel Binary Model Based Bayes ClassifierWenda He, Erika R. E. Denton, Reyer Zwiggelaar. 40-47 [doi]
• Intensity-Based MRI to X-ray Mammography Registration with an Integrated Fast Biomechanical TransformationThomy Mertzanidou, John H. Hipwell, Lianghao Han, Zeike A. Taylor, Henkjan J. Huisman, Ulrich Bick, Nico Karssemeijer, David J. Hawkes. 48-55 [doi]
• Comparison of Experimental, mantis, and hybridmantis X-ray Response for a Breast Imaging CsI DetectorDiksha Sharma, Aldo Badano. 56-63 [doi]
• Breast Mass Classification Using Orthogonal MomentsFabián Narváez, Eduardo Romero. 64-71 [doi]
• A Task-Specific Argument for Variable-Exposure Breast TomosynthesisStefano Young, Andreu Badal, Kyle J. Myers, Subok Park. 72-79 [doi]
• Detective Quantum Efficiency of a CsI-CMOS X-ray Detector for Breast Tomosynthesis Operating in High Dynamic Range and High Sensitivity ModesTushita Patel, Kelly Klanian, Zongyi Gong, Mark B. Williams. 80-87 [doi]
• Multimodal Classification of Breast Masses in Mammography and MRI Using Unimodal Feature Selection and Decision FusionJan M. Lesniak, Guido van Schie, Christine Tanner, Bram Platel, Henkjan J. Huisman, Nico Karssemeijer, Gábor Székely. 88-95 [doi]
• Comparison of Lesion Size Using Area and Volume in Full Field Digital MammogramsJelena Bozek, Michiel Kallenberg, Mislav Grgic, Nico Karssemeijer. 96-103 [doi]
• Very High Contrast and Very High Spatial Resolution 2-D, 2.5-D and 3-D Breast Tissue Visualization under X-ray Dark Field ImagingMasami Ando, Qingkai Huo, Shu Ichihara, Tokiko Endo, Tetsuya Yuasa, Naoki Sunaguchi, Kensaku Mori. 104-110 [doi]
• Detecting Clusters of Microcalcifications with a Cascade-Based ApproachAlessandro Bria, Claudio Marrocco, Mario Molinara, Francesco Tortorella. 111-118 [doi]
• Diagnostic Impact of Adjunction of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) and in Comparison with Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)Nachiko Uchiyama, Takayuki Kinoshita, Takashi Hojo, Sota Asaga, Junko Suzuki, Shiho Gomi, Chieko Nagashima, Yoko Kawawa, Kyoichi Otsuka. 119-126 [doi]
• Ethnic Variation in Volumetric Breast DensitySadaf Hashmi, Jamie C. Sergeant, Julie Morris, Sigrid Whiteside, Paula Stavrinos, D. Gareth Evans, Tony Howell, Mary Wilson, Nicky B. Barr, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Susan M. Astley. 127-133 [doi]
• Personalizing Mammographic Dosimetry Using Multilayered Anatomy-Based Breast ModelsMariela A. Porras-Chaverri, John R. Vetter, Ralph Highnam. 134-140 [doi]
• A Directional Small-Scale Tissue Model for an Anthropomorphic Breast PhantomIngrid S. Reiser, Beverly A. Lau, Robert M. Nishikawa, Predrag R. Bakic. 141-148 [doi]
• Simulation of Three Material Partial Volume Averaging in a Software Breast PhantomFeiyu Chen, David D. Pokrajac, Xiquan Shi, Fengshan Liu, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Predrag R. Bakic. 149-156 [doi]
• Iterative Reconstruction with Monte Carlo Based System Matrix for Dedicated Breast PETKrishnendu Saha, Kenneth J. Straus, Stephen J. Glick. 157-164 [doi]
• Comparison of Contact Spot Imaging on a Scanning Mammography System to Conventional Geometric Magnification ImagingGillian Egan, Elizabeth Keavey, Niall Phelan. 165-172 [doi]
• Region Matching in the Temporal Study of Mammograms Using Integral Invariant Scale-SpaceFaraz Janan, Michael Brady. 173-180 [doi]
• Characterizing Breast Phenotype with a Novel Measure of Fibroglandular StructureJohn H. Hipwell, Lewis D. Griffin, Patsy J. Whelehan, Wenlong Song, Xiying Zhang, Jan M. Lesniak, Sarah Vinnicombe, Andy Evans, Jonathan Berg, David J. Hawkes. 181-188 [doi]
• Performance of Computed Radiography and Direct Digital Radiography in a Screening Setting: Effect on the Screening IndicatorsChantal Van Ongeval, Sandra Postema, André Van Steen, Gretel Vande Putte, Erik van Limbergen, Federica Zanca, Hilde Bosmans. 189-196 [doi]
• A Quality Control Framework Using Task-Based Detectability Measurements for Digital MammographyAili Bloomquist, James G. Mainprize, Gordon E. Mawdsley, Martin J. Yaffe. 197-204 [doi]
• Longitudinal Change in Mammographic Density and Association with Breast Cancer Risk: A Case-Control StudyChew Ting, Susan M. Astley, Julie Morris, Paula Stavrinos, Mary Wilson, Nicky B. Barr, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Jamie C. Sergeant. 205-211 [doi]
• Long-Term Stability of Image Quality Measurements for Two Digital Mammography SystemsJennifer M. Oduko, Kenneth C. Young. 212-219 [doi]
• Characterization of Spatial Luminance Noise in Stereoscopic Displays for Breast ImagingCecilia Marini-Bettolo, Joel Wang, Wei-Chung Cheng, Robert J. Jennings, Aldo Badano. 220-227 [doi]
• Volumetric and Area-Based Breast Density Measurement in the Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening (PROCAS) StudyJamie C. Sergeant, Jane Warwick, D. Gareth Evans, Anthony Howell, Michael Berks, Paula Stavrinos, Sarah Sahin, Mary Wilson, Alan Hufton, Iain E. Buchan, Susan M. Astley. 228-235 [doi]
• Breast Cancer Risk Prediction via Area and Volumetric Estimates of Breast DensityBrad M. Keller, Emily F. Conant, Huen Oh, Despina Kontos. 236-243 [doi]
• Fully-Automated Fibroglandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRIShandong Wu, Susan Weinstein, Brad M. Keller, Emily F. Conant, Despina Kontos. 244-251 [doi]
• Inferring the Breast Periphery from an Image When Measuring Volumetric Breast DensityChristopher E. Tromans, Michael Brady. 252-259 [doi]
• Digital Scatter Removal for Mammography and Tomosynthesis Image AcquisitionChristopher E. Tromans, Mary Cocker, Michael Brady. 260-267 [doi]
• Filtering of Poisson Noise in Digital Mammography Using Local Statistics and Adaptive Wiener FilterMarcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira, Predrag R. Bakic, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Homero Schiabel, Nelson D. A. Mascarenhas. 268-275 [doi]
• A Novel Workflow-Centric Breast MRI Reading Prototype Utilizing Multitouch GesturesMarkus Thorsten Harz, Felix Ritter, Simon Benten, Kathy J. Schilling, Heinz-Otto Peitgen. 276-283 [doi]
• Evaluation of Various Mammography Phantoms for Image Quality Assessment in Digital Breast TomosynthesisClaudia C. Brunner, Raymond J. Acciavatti, Predrag R. Bakic, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Mark B. Williams, Richard Kaczmarek, Kish Chakrabarti. 284-291 [doi]
• Effects of Medical Display Luminance, Contrast and Temporal Compensation on CHO Detection Performance at Various Browsing Speeds and on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ImagesCédric Marchessoux, Ali N. Avanaki, Predrag R. Bakic, Tom Kimpe, Andrew D. A. Maidment. 292-299 [doi]
• The Impact of Reduced Injected Radioactivity on Image Quality of Molecular Breast Imaging TomosynthesisOlivia Sullivan, Zongyi Gong, Kelly Klanian, Tushita Patel, Mark B. Williams. 300-307 [doi]
• Automatic Seed Placement for Breast Lesion Segmentation on US ImagesJoan Massich, Fabrice Meriaudeau, Melcior Sentís, Sergi Ganau, Elsa Pérez, Robert Marti, Arnau Oliver, Joan Martí. 308-315 [doi]
• Comparison of Breast Doses for Digital Tomosynthesis Estimated from Patient Exposures and Using PMMA Breast PhantomsDavid R. Dance, Celia J. Strudley, Kenneth C. Young, Jennifer M. Oduko, Patsy J. Whelehan, E. H. Lindsay Mungutroy. 316-321 [doi]
• Phantoms for Quality Control Procedures of Digital Breast TomosynthesisRamona Bouwman, Oliver Díaz, Kenneth C. Young, Ruben E. van Engen, Wouter J. H. Veldkamp, David R. Dance. 322-329 [doi]
• Development of a Quality Control Protocol for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems in the TOMMY TrialCelia J. Strudley, Kenneth C. Young, Jennifer M. Oduko, Padraig Looney, Annabel Barnard, Fiona J. Gilbert. 330-337 [doi]
• A Modelling Framework for Evaluation of 2D-Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis SystemsPremkumar Elangovan, Alistair Mackenzie, Oliver Díaz, Alaleh Rashidnasab, David R. Dance, Kenneth C. Young, Lucy M. Warren, Eman Shaheen, Hilde Bosmans, Predrag R. Bakic, Kevin Wells. 338-345 [doi]
• Is the Outcome of Optimizing the System Acquisition Parameters Sensitive to the Reconstruction Algorithm in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?Rongping Zeng, Subok Park, Predrag R. Bakic, Kyle J. Myers. 346-353 [doi]
• Usefulness of Adjunction of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) in Evaluation of Pathological Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) for Breast CancerNachiko Uchiyama, Takayuki Kinoshita, Takashi Hojo, Sota Asaga, Junko Suzuki, Yoko Kawawa, Kyoichi Otsuka. 354-361 [doi]
• The Morphology of Microcalcifications in 2D Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis: Is It Different?Eman Shaheen, Chantal Van Ongeval, Federica Zanca, Lesley Cockmartin, Nicholas Marshall, Frederik De Keyzer, Kenneth C. Young, David R. Dance, Hilde Bosmans. 362-368 [doi]
• Comparison of 15° and 30° Angle Acquisition Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Visualization and Characterization of Breast AbnormalitiesLaurie Lee Fajardo, Limin Yang, Jeong Mi Park. 369-376 [doi]
• Differences in Radiologists' Experiences and Performance in Breast TomosynthesisTony Svahn, Kristina Lång, Ingvar Andersson, Sophia Zackrisson. 377-385 [doi]
• Proposing an Acquisition Geometry That Optimizes Super-Resolution in Digital Breast TomosynthesisRaymond J. Acciavatti, Andrew D. A. Maidment. 386-393 [doi]
• Converting One Set of Mammograms to Simulate a Range of Detector Imaging Characteristics for Observer StudiesAlistair Mackenzie, David R. Dance, Oliver Díaz, Annabel Barnard, Kenneth C. Young. 394-401 [doi]
• Quantification of Tc-99m Sestamibi Distribution in Normal Breast Tissue Using Dedicated Breast SPECT-CTSteve D. Mann, Kristy L. Perez, Emily K. E. McCracken, Jainil P. Shah, Kingshuk R. Choudhury, Terence Z. Wong, Martin P. Tornai. 402-409 [doi]
• Impact of Digitalization of Mammographic Units on Average Glandular Doses in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening ProgramAn De Hauwere, Hubert Thierens. 410-417 [doi]
• An Examination of Silver as a Radiographic Contrast Agent in Dual-Energy Breast X-ray ImagingRoshan Karunamuni, Ajlan Al Zaki, Anatoliy V. Popov, E. James Delikatny, Sara Gavenonis, Andrew Tsourkas, Andrew D. A. Maidment. 418-425 [doi]
• Initial Evaluation of a Newly Developed High Resolution CT Imager for Dedicated Breast CTJainil P. Shah, Steve D. Mann, Andrew M. Polemi, Martin P. Tornai, Randolph L. McKinley, George Zentai, Michelle Richmond, Larry Partain. 426-433 [doi]
• Comparison of Lesion Extent and Contrast-Agent Uptake in Breast Tomosynthesis versus Cone-Beam Breast CTPablo M. de Carvalho, Ann-Katherine Carton, Razvan Iordache, Sylvie Saab-Puong, Serge Muller. 434-441 [doi]
• Development and Initial Demonstration of a Low-Dose Dedicated Fully 3D Breast CT SystemRandolph L. McKinley, Martin P. Tornai, Laura A. Tuttle, Doreen Steed, Cherie M. Kuzmiak. 442-449 [doi]
• Correspondence among Subjective and Objective Similarities and Pathologic Types of Breast Masses on Digital MammographyChisako Muramatsu, Kohei Nishimura, Mikinao Oiwa, Misaki Shiraiwa, Tokiko Endo, Kunio Doi, Hiroshi Fujita. 450-457 [doi]
• A Hypothesis-Test Framework for Quantitative Lesion Detection and DiagnosisChristopher E. Tromans, Guido van Schie, Nico Karssemeijer, Michael Brady. 458-465 [doi]
• Breast Density into Clinical PracticeRalph Highnam, Natascha Sauber, Stamatia Destounis, Jennifer Harvey, Dennis McDonald. 466-473 [doi]
• Intensity Independent Texture Analysis in Screening MammogramsXi-Zhao Li, Simon Williams, Murk J. Bottema. 474-481 [doi]
• Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability of Radiologists Evaluating CBIR SystemsLubomir M. Hadjiiski, Hyun-chong Cho, Heang-Ping Chan, Berkman Sahiner, Mark A. Helvie, Chintana Paramagul, Alexis V. Nees. 482-489 [doi]
• Quantification of Detection Probability of Microcalcifications at Increased Display Luminance LevelsTom R. L. Kimpe, Albert Xthona. 490-497 [doi]
• Development of Computer Techniques Designed to Aid Tests of Digital Mammography Systems Quality Evaluation with the Phantom CDMAM 3.4Maria A. Z. Sousa, Homero Schiabel, Regina B. Medeiros. 498-505 [doi]
• Towards Breast Anatomy Simulation Using GPUsJoseph H. Chui, David D. Pokrajac, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Predrag R. Bakic. 506-513 [doi]
• Breast Parenchymal Pattern (BPP) Analysis: Comparison of Digital Mammograms and Breast TomosynthesisJun Wei 0002, Heang-Ping Chan, Yao Lu, Lubomir M. Hadjiiski, Chuan Zhou, Mark A. Helvie. 514-520 [doi]
• Classification of Microcalcification Clusters Based on Morphological Topology AnalysisZhili Chen, Erika R. E. Denton, Reyer Zwiggelaar. 521-528 [doi]
• Spectral Volumetric Glandularity AssessmentAndré Gooßen, Harald S. Heese, Klaus Erhard, Björn Norell. 529-536 [doi]
• Power-Law, Beta, and (Slight) Chaos in Automated Mammography Breast Structure CharacterizationJoep J. M. Kierkels, Wouter J. H. Veldkamp, Ramona Bouwman, Ruben E. van Engen. 537-544 [doi]
• Breast Density Measurement in Full-Field Digital Mammography: System Calibration and StabilityCharlotte Kerrison, Oliver Putt, Jamie C. Sergeant, Tina Dunn, Jennifer Diffey, Susan M. Astley, Alan Hufton. 545-552 [doi]
• A Method for Lesion Visibility Prediction in Mammograms by Local Analysis of Spectral Anatomical NoiseStephanie Simbt, Hanns-Ingo Maack, Harald S. Heese. 553-560 [doi]
• Adapting Breast Density Classification from Digitized to Full-Field Digital MammogramsMeritxell Tortajada, Arnau Oliver, Robert Marti, Mariona Vilagran, Sergi Ganau, Lidia Tortajada, Melcior Sentís, Jordi Freixenet. 561-568 [doi]
• Improvements and Performance of Diagnostic Compositional Imaging Using a Novel Dual-Energy X-ray TechniqueFred Duewer, Chris I. Flowers, Karla Kerlikowske, Serghei Malkov, Bonnie N. Joe, John Shepherd. 569-574 [doi]
• Monte Carlo Simulation of a-Se X-ray Detectors for Breast Imaging: Effect of Nearest-Neighbor Recombination Algorithm on Swank NoiseYuan Fang, Diksha Sharma, Andreu Badal, Karim S. Karim, Aldo Badano. 575-582 [doi]
• Initial Result of a Prospective Study: Comparison between a Low Dose 3D Stereo Mammography and FFDMAndreas Lohre, Dirk Stoesser, Akira Hasegawa, Cord Neitzke. 583-588 [doi]
• Volumetric and Area-Based Measures of Mammographic Density in Women with and without CancerLeila Nutine, Jamie C. Sergeant, Julie Morris, Paula Stavrinos, D. Gareth Evans, Tony Howell, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Mary Wilson, Nicky B. Barr, Susan M. Astley. 589-595 [doi]
• Mammographic Parenchymal Texture Analysis for Estrogen-Receptor Subtype Specific Breast Cancer Risk EstimationGopal Karemore, Brad M. Keller, Huen Oh, Julia Tchou, Mads Nielsen, Emily F. Conant, Despina Kontos. 596-603 [doi]
• A Phantom Study for Assessing the Effect of Different Digital Detectors on Mammographic Texture FeaturesYan Wang, Brad M. Keller, Yuanjie Zheng, Raymond J. Acciavatti, James C. Gee, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Despina Kontos. 604-610 [doi]
• Reduction of Patient Dose in Digital Mammography: Simulation of Low-Dose Image from a Routine DoseYuki Saito, Aya Kawai, Naotoshi Fujita, Maki Yamada, Yoshie Kodera. 611-618 [doi]
• Comparison of Hologic's Quantra Volumetric Assessment to MRI Breast DensityJeff Wang, Ania Aziz, David Newitt, Bonnie N. Joe, Nola Hylton, John A. Shepherd. 619-626 [doi]
• 2D/3D Registration for Localization of Mammographically Depicted Lesions in Breast MRITorsten Hopp, Nicole V. Ruiter. 627-634 [doi]
• Application of a Protocol for Constancy Control of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems: Results and ExperiencesKristin Pedersen, Robin L. Hammond, Bjørn H. Østerås. 635-641 [doi]
• Design and Evaluation of a Phantom with Structured Background for Digital Mammography and Breast TomosynthesisLesley Cockmartin, Nicholas Marshall, Hilde Bosmans. 642-649 [doi]
• An Experimental Comparison of Continuous Motion and Step-and-Shoot Modes in Digital Breast TomosynthesisRui Peng, Rongping Zeng, Eugene O'Bryan, Cecilia Marini-Bettolo, Berkman Sahiner, Kyle J. Myers, Robert J. Jennings. 650-657 [doi]
• Application of a Dynamic 4D Anthropomorphic Breast Phantom in Contrast-Based Imaging System Optimization: Dual-Energy or Temporal Subtraction?Nooshin Kiarashi, Sujata V. Ghate, Joseph Y. Lo, Loren W. Nolte, Ehsan Samei. 658-665 [doi]
• Image Processing and Registration of Opposed View 3D Breast UltrasoundSumedha Sinha, Fong-Ming Hooi, Renee Pinsky, Oliver Kripfgans, Paul L. Carson. 666-672 [doi]
• Detecting Low-Conspicuity Mammographic Findings - The Real Added Value of CADIsaac Leichter, Richard Lederman, Alexandra Manevitch. 673-681 [doi]
• Potential of a Standalone Computer-Aided Detection System for Breast Cancer Detection in Screening MammographyJaime Melendez, Clara I. Sánchez, Rianne Hupse, Bram van Ginneken, Nico Karssemeijer. 682-689 [doi]
• Estimating Sensitivity and Specificity in an ROC ExperimentRobert M. Nishikawa. 690-696 [doi]
• Level Set Breast Mass Segmentation in Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Breast CTHsien-Chi Kuo, Maryellen L. Giger, Ingrid S. Reiser, John M. Boone, Karen K. Lindfors, Kai Yang, Alexandra Edwards. 697-704 [doi]
• Methods for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Are Not Necessarily Valid for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Computer-Aided Detection in Screening MammographyRobert M. Nishikawa. 705-712 [doi]
• Joint Registration and Limited-Angle Reconstruction of Digital Breast TomosynthesisGuang Yang, John H. Hipwell, Christine Tanner, David J. Hawkes, Simon R. Arridge. 713-720 [doi]
• Dose Reduction for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis by Patch-Based Denoising in ReconstructionGang Wu, James G. Mainprize, Martin J. Yaffe. 721-728 [doi]
• Out-of-Plane Artifact Reduction in Tomosynthesis Based on Regression Modeling and Outlier DetectionShiras Abdurahman, Anna K. Jerebko, Thomas Mertelmeier, Tobias Lasser, Nassir Navab. 729-736 [doi]
• Investigating Oblique Reconstructions with Super-Resolution in Digital Breast TomosynthesisRaymond J. Acciavatti, Stewart B. Mein, Andrew D. A. Maidment. 737-744 [doi]
• Improving Image Quality of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis by Artifact ReductionYao Lu, Heang-Ping Chan, Jun Wei 0002, Lubomir M. Hadjiiski, Chuan Zhou. 745-752 [doi]
• Automatic Volumetric Glandularity Assessment from Full Field Digital MammogramsAndré Gooßen, Harald S. Heese, Klaus Erhard. 753-760 [doi]
• A Breast Density-Dependent Power-Law Model for Digital MammographyJames G. Mainprize, Martin J. Yaffe. 761-768 [doi]
• A Calibration Approach for Single-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Method to Provide Absolute Breast Tissue Composition Accuracy for the Long TermSerghei Malkov, Jeff Wang, Fred Duewer, John A. Shepherd. 769-774 [doi]
• Local versus Whole Breast Volumetric Breast Density Assessments and ImplicationsBaorui Ren, Andrew P. Smith, Zhenxue Jing. 775-782 [doi]