External Links

    Journal: Learned Publishing

    Volume 29, Issue 4

    227 -- 228Judy Luther. Changing of the guard
    229 -- 238Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza, Ricardo Arencibia Jorge. A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation
    239 -- 248Melba G. Claudio-González, Montserrat Martín-Baranera, Anna Villarroya. A cluster analysis of the business models of Spanish journals
    249 -- 258Maryam Zeinolabedini, Javad Gholami. Colleagues helping each other to publish in medical sciences: Iranian field specialists' convenience editing strategies
    259 -- 269Mikael Laakso, David J. Solomon, Bo-Christer Björk. How subscription-based scholarly journals can convert to open access: A review of approaches
    271 -- 279Caitlin Gebhard, Bruce Rosenblum. Wrangling math from Microsoft Word into JATS XML workflows
    283 -- 290David Thew. Mentoring as a career development tool: A universal resource or only for the 'anointed'?
    293 -- 299Edith Holmes. Economies of small: How a single-journal publisher remains independent and grows
    301 -- 305Alexandre Martin, Tristan Martin. A not-so-harmless experiment in predatory open access publishing
    307 -- 310Julian M. Bass. Improving writing processes using lean and Kanban

    Volume 29, Issue 3

    143 -- 144Pippa Smart. Are publishers failing as a service industry?
    145 -- 153Songqing Lin, Lijuan Zhan. International publishing partnerships for China's English language journals and financial security
    155 -- 163Eleonora Dagiene, Danute Krapavickaite. How researchers manage their academic activities
    165 -- 172Abdullah Abrizah, David Nicholas, Abdullah Noorhidawati, Yanti Idaya Aspura Mohd Khalid, Fathiah Badawi. Not so different after all: Malaysian researchers' cross-discipline view of quality and trustworthiness in citation practices
    173 -- 182David Nicholas, David Clark, Eti Herman. ResearchGate: Reputation uncovered
    183 -- 192Louisa Ha, WeiWei Jiang, Chang Bi, Ruonan Zhang, Tao Zhang, Xiaoli Wen. How online usage of subscription-based journalism and mass communication research journal articles predicts citations
    193 -- 198Geum-Hee Jeong, Sun Huh. Analysis of the suitability of the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies journal evaluation tool
    201 -- 205Alex D. Wade, Kuansan Wang. The rise of the machines: Artificial intelligence meets scholarly content
    207 -- 209Vicky Williams. Broader outreach: Fad or future?
    211 -- 213Sneha Kulkarni. What causes peer review scams and how can they be prevented?
    215 -- 218Rick Anderson. Why are there virtually no mandatory open access policies at American universities?
    219 -- 221Anne-Katharina Weilenmann. Scientific communication - on the brink of the next evolution?

    Volume 29, Issue 2

    75 -- 76Judy Luther. Discovery in an age of artificial intelligence
    77 -- 82Mohammad Reza Ghane. How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals?
    83 -- 88Heather Morrison. Small scholar-led scholarly journals: Can they survive and thrive in an open access future?
    89 -- 94Candela Ollé Castellà, Alexandre López Borrull, Ernest Abadal. The challenges facing library and information science journals: Editors' opinions
    97 -- 101Albert N. Greco, Robert Michael Wharton, Amy Brand. Demographics of scholarly publishing and communication professionals
    103 -- 111Ali Gazni, Zahra Ghaseminik. Internationalization of scientific publishing over time: Analysing publishers and fields differences
    113 -- 117Katie Foxall, Audrey Nailor. ecancer case study
    119 -- 123Jonathan Griffin. Access to Research: An innovative and successful initiative by the UK publishing industry
    125 -- 129Paul Kudlow, Alan Rutledge, Aviv Shachak, Roger S. McIntyre, Gunther Eysenbach. TrendMD: Helping scholarly content providers reach larger and more targeted audiences
    131 -- 134Bo-Christer Björk. The open access movement at a crossroad: Are the big publishers and academic social media taking over?
    135 -- 138Lauren Kane, Alice Meadows. From the podium to the boardroom: Encouraging gender parity in scholarly publishing

    Volume 29, Issue 1

    5 -- 7Michael Willis. Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses
    9 -- 12Bo-Christer Björk, Paul Catani. Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?
    13 -- 21Michael Jubb. Peer review: The current landscape and future trends
    23 -- 25Stephen R. Thompson, Julie Agel, Elena Losina. The JBJS Peer-Review Scoring Scale: A valid, reliable instrument for measuring the quality of peer review reports
    27 -- 29James Hartley, John Cowan, Nick Rushby. Peer choice - does reviewer self-selection work?
    31 -- 38David Nicholas, Jie Xu, Lifang Xu, Jing Su, Anthony Watkinson. Chinese researchers, scholarly communication behaviour and trust
    41 -- 50Verity Warne. Rewarding reviewers - sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained
    51 -- 53Fiona Murphy. An update on peer review and research data
    55 -- 59Ruwaida M. Salem, Natalie M. Culbertson, Alison O'Connell. Process for selecting and implementing a manuscript management system: Experiences of a new peer-reviewed journal
    60 -- 63Brooks Hanson, Rebecca Lawrence, Alice Meadows, Laura Paglione. Early adopters of ORCID functionality enabling recognition of peer review: Two brief case studies
    65 -- 68Alison Baverstock. Is peer review still the content industry's upper house?
    69 -- 71Rebecca Kennison. Back to the future: (re)turning from peer review to peer engagement
    runs on