External Links

    Journal: Learned Publishing

    Volume 32, Issue 4

    289 -- 0. Table of Contents
    291 -- 292Megan Ainsworth. How can publishers support early career journal editors?
    295 -- 303Kartik K. Venkatesh, Rebecca S. Benner, Thomas W. Riggs, Nancy C. Chescheir. Final outcome of articles rejected after revision at Obstetrics & Gynecology: An investigation
    304 -- 311Ahmed Maher Khafaga Shehata. Exploring the scholarly communication styles of Arab social science and humanities scholars
    312 -- 313. ALPSP Awards 2019
    314 -- 324Quan-Hoang Vuong. The harsh world of publishing in emerging regions and implications for editors and publishers: The case of Vietnam
    325 -- 334Qiang Zou, Jingqiu Ma, Xiaoyang Sheng. A survey of medical ghostwriting in China
    335 -- 344Vivienne C. Bachelet, Francisco A. Uribe, Rubén A. Díaz, Alonso F. Vergara, Fabiana Bravo-Córdova, Víctor A. Carrasco, Francisca J. Lizana, Nicolás Meza-Ducaud, María S. Navarrete. Misrepresentation of institutional affiliations: The results from an exploratory case study of Chilean authors
    345 -- 354Francis Dodds. The future of academic publishing: Revolution or evolution revisited
    355 -- 366Michael Pemberton, Susanne Hall, Cary Moskovitz, Chris M. Anson. Text recycling: Views of North American journal editors from an interview-based study
    367 -- 374Chris James, Lisa Colledge, Wim J. N. Meester, Norman Azoulay, Andrew M. Plume. CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index
    375 -- 381Stewart Manley. On the limitations of recent lawsuits against Sci-Hub, OMICS, ResearchGate, and Georgia State University
    383 -- 393Anna O'Brien, Chris Graf, Kate McKellar. How publishers and editors can help early career researchers: Recommendations from a roundtable discussion
    395 -- 405Toby Green. Maximizing dissemination and engaging readers: The other 50% of an author's day: A case study
    406 -- 408Thiago F. A. França, José Maria Monserrat. Reproducibility crisis, the scientific method, and the quality of published studies: Untangling the knot
    409 -- 411James Galbraith. Library Acquisitions Patterns: Review
    412 -- 0. Journal Information

    Volume 32, Issue 3

    193 -- 0. Table of Contents
    195 -- 197Pippa Smart. What did early career researchers ever do for us?
    199 -- 206Jungwon Yoon, EunKyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee, Jihyun Kim. How research data is cited in scholarly literature: A case study of HINTS
    207 -- 211Li Sun. Journals removed from DOAJ appearing within SCImago's ranks: A study of excluded journals
    213 -- 219Lingfeng Wang, YaQing Zhan. A conceptual peer review model for arXiv and other preprint databases
    221 -- 226Tove Faber Frandsen. How can a questionable journal be identified: Frameworks and checklists
    227 -- 236Bo-Christer Björk. Open access journal publishing in the Nordic countries
    237 -- 247David Nicholas, Anthony Watkinson, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez Bravo, Jie Xu 0005, Abdullah Abrizah, Marzena Swigon, David J. Clark, Eti Herman. So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?
    249 -- 258Sergio Copiello. On the skewness of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations: Cues for discussion from a case study
    259 -- 269Josep Soler, Ying Wang. Linguistic differences between well-established and predatory journals: a keyword analysis of two journals in political science
    271 -- 281Margaret K. Merga, Shannon Mason, Julia Morris. 'The constant rejections hurt': Skills and personal attributes needed to successfully complete a thesis by publication
    283 -- 286Tom Hill. Turning FAIR into reality: Review
    288 -- 0. Journal Information

    Volume 32, Issue 2

    101 -- 0. Table of Contents
    103 -- 105Pippa Smart. Journal development: Why and how?
    106 -- 112Gert Helgesson, Stefan Eriksson. Authorship order
    113 -- 125Jie Xu, Jia-Yun Wang, Lihong Zhou, Fen Liu. Internationalization of China's English-language academic journals: An overview and three approaches
    126 -- 136Yuehong (Helen) Zhang, Fang Bao, Jian Wu, Hanfeng Lin. Reflections on the international impact of Chinese STM journals
    137 -- 146Päivi Atjonen. Peer review in the development of academic articles: Experiences of Finnish authors in the educational sciences
    147 -- 153David Nicholas, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Jie Xu 0005, Eti Herman, David J. Clark, Abdullah Abrizah, Blanca Rodríguez Bravo, Marzena Swigon. Sci-Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front
    154 -- 162Yang Zhang, Huilian Lun. Is Google Scholar useful for the evaluation of non-English scientific journals? The case of Chinese journals
    163 -- 175Heidi Allen, Alexandra Cury, Thomas Gaston, Chris Graf, Hannah Wakley, Michael Willis. What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice
    177 -- 180Heather Staines. What's happening with open annotation? Discoverability, engagement, community
    181 -- 187Hea Lim Rhee. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information's scholarly journal publishing: A case study
    188 -- 190Stuart Buck. The debate over open access is missing the point
    191 -- 0. Journal Information

    Volume 32, Issue 1

    1 -- 0. Table of Contents
    3 -- 5Andrew M. Plume. Bring the facts, bust the myths
    7 -- 12Dan Pollock, Ann Michael. Open access mythbusting: Testing two prevailing assumptions about the effects of open access adoption
    13 -- 25Toby Green. Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet-era transformation of scholarly communications
    27 -- 35John Hartley, Jason Potts, Lucy Montgomery, Ellie Rennie, Cameron Neylon. Do we need to move from communication technology to user community? A new economic model of the journal as a club
    37 -- 46Noel McGlinchey, Tom Hunter, Jack Bromley, Ruth Fisher, Anna Debiec-Waszak, Thomas Gaston. Do Journal Administrators solve the reviewer assignment problem as well as editors? Consideration of reviewer rigour and timeliness
    47 -- 56Pippa Smart, Thomas Gaston. How prevalent are plagiarized submissions? Global survey of editors
    57 -- 62Tove Faber Frandsen. Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature
    63 -- 69Chris Drummond. Is the drive for reproducible science having a detrimental effect on what is published?
    71 -- 74Liz Allen, Alison O'Connell, Veronique Kiermer. How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship
    75 -- 78Alison McGonagle-O'Connell, Kristen Ratan. Can we transform scholarly communication with open source and community-owned infrastructure?
    79 -- 83Michael Upshall. Mythbusting AI: What is all the fuss about?
    85 -- 89Eleanor I. Cook, Regina Romano Reynolds. Is the term 'serials' relevant any longer? Some thoughts on the matter..
    90 -- 94Gareth Dyke. Does the early career 'publish or perish' myth represent an opportunity for the publishing industry?
    95 -- 96Charlotte Mauti. The pursuit of publishing: Was a masters in publishing worthwhile?
    97 -- 98Rachel Kessler. White paper: Paths to reference - how today's students find and use reference resources: Review
    99 -- 0. Thanking our reviewers
    100 -- 0. Journal Information
    runs on