- Kari Edison Watkins. Using value sensitive design to understand transportation choices and envision a future transportation system. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(1):79-82, 2021.
- M. John Lamola. An ontic-ontological theory for ethics of designing social robots: a case of Black African women and humanoids. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(2):119-126, 2021.
- David G. Hendry, Batya Friedman, Stephanie Ballard. Value sensitive design as a formative framework. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(1):39-44, 2021.
- Annuska Zolyomi. Where the stakeholders are: tapping into social media during value-sensitive design research. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(1):59-62, 2021.
- Maaike Harbers. Using agent-based simulations to address value tensions in design. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(1):49-52, 2021.
- Anne Weibert, Konstantin Aal, Markus Rohde, Volker Wulf. Scaling local experiences to global challenges: insights from grounded design and value sensitive design. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(1):33-37, 2021.
- Batya Friedman, Maaike Harbers, David G. Hendry, Jeroen van den Hoven, Catholijn M. Jonker, Nick Logler. Introduction to the special issue: value sensitive design: charting the next decade. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(1):1-3, 2021.
- Daisy Yoo. Stakeholder Tokens: a constructive method for value sensitive design stakeholder analysis. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(1):63-67, 2021.
- Qinyu Li, Peter Tolmie, Anne Weibert, Marén Schorch, Claudia Müller 0002, Volker Wulf. E-Portfolio: value tensions encountered in documenting design case studies. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(1):89-93, 2021.
- Bongani Andy Mabaso. Computationally rational agents can be moral agents. Ethics Inf. Technol., 23(2):137-145, 2021.